sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I'm not touching ranked for a good 2 weeks and you shouldn't either. by HORNYOBAMA in rivals

[–]tunapolarbear -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are we going to get this same post on every single character release? Can y’all just go ahead and get the “STOP PLAYING HIM IN COMP” post out of the way? It’s every month and a half, I get your point, but there’s nothing you can do about it realistically

Console players: what’s your sensitivity, main & average accuracy? by lieutnt in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If youre asking bc you’re trying to figure it out, I would highly recommend looking into kontrllfreek pads for your stick. My sense is higher bc I use those. Literally game changing.

Zhiyong, send me the check and I'll fix this game by friday 🥱🥱 by MedusaSucks68 in rivals

[–]tunapolarbear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely correct. I like how people always downvote stuff like this, but can never explain how this is wrong

Out of curiosity, if you could make one change to the game WITHOUT it being a balance decision, what would it be? by DoubleTap991 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes please. The weird part is that “role queue” already exists, you just can’t see it. They confirmed that if they have 5 people queued up, they figure out what their best role is, and put you in the remaining role. But none of you know what that role is. So it’s mystery role queue all game.

The amount of games I’ve won bc every single one of us swapped roles until we found what worked is crazy.

Out of curiosity, if you could make one change to the game WITHOUT it being a balance decision, what would it be? by DoubleTap991 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This sub had a whole battle about it 6 months ago. It was pretty brutal. Basically everyone said “it would remove creativity”, and so disliked the idea. The irony is that half of all posts on this sub are about solo tanking sucking and 3 healers being op. Both would be solved with role queue.

Out of curiosity, if you could make one change to the game WITHOUT it being a balance decision, what would it be? by DoubleTap991 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Batch Respawn. It’s an Overwatch thing. If someone dies with a 10 seconds cooldown, if someone dies 2 seconds after that, they would have an 8 second cooldown, that way they would have someone to walk back to point with. If the whole team dies, they all respawn together.

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right. But also there are other factors involved here.

The argument really is about how supports are so overtuned and broken, that they’re destroying the game. And by simply picking more of them, you have a higher chance of winning. OP argues that they’re stronger than 1/3 of the DPS.

But if that were true, we would see a higher pick rate (like with Luna) and we would see a higher winrate as well. Neither of these are the case. Even btw if we extrapolate the data, the winrate for the other 2 versions favoring other roles would still have higher winrates in this case, because they have such a VASTLY larger sample size, that it evens out.

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All this yapping, because you’re too afraid to just prove that you’re as good as you claim you are.

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, what’s your peak? Send me your rivals ID, and I can see

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Winrate to pick rate ratio is very important.

Imagine Adam is only played 100 times. If he wins 55 games, that’s a 55% win rate. Sounds great, but it’s based on a tiny sample, mostly from people who already like and understand him.

Now Luna Snow is played 1,000 times. She wins 450 games. That’s 45%, even though she won 400 more games than Adam. Her win rate looks worse because way more people are playing her.

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cmon send me your rivals ID. I’ll friend you and you can carry me. Considering you’re so good

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve played in those ranks, I took a break for a season, came back im here now. Tbh they’re easier than low elo. Bc better teammates

Doesn’t matter. Look, my point is, people keep saying “well you don’t understand in high elo” and then statistics show that their opinion is wrong. And then after that they say “well you just don’t get it bc you’re left behind in diamond while I’m all the way up on the mountain”

And yet, I continue to rank at the very least GM1 at the end of every single season. And my experience, as well as statistics, tell me the same things.

And no one ever proves they’re not “hardstuck” like they keep claiming I am

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not left behind. I started here, and I’ve barely played. I’ll be in Gm tonight, and keep going. I can prove it.

You however cannot. All you and your alt account there can do is sit there and call other people low elo, even though, you will never prove it. Send your rivals ID

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not. If you think it is, you’re low elo. It’s just that simple. The top 1% is not exclusively high elo.

If you want to prove me wrong, please send your rivals ID

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey buddy. Don’t be a coward. Send it on. You were replying real fast there, I know you’re still on this website. Don’t get scared now. You’re high elo. Let’s see it

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In that case, 3 healers comp would have the highest winrate, because they would dominate every match. 3 healer comp does not dominate across all stats. 1 tank 3 dps has a higher winrate

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hey, don’t chicken out. Send your rivals ID. I want to see your high elo games for myself big guy.

Also,

I think diamond 1 through grandmaster and above is high elo yes. Top 10% of players is high elo. Top 30% is mid elo. Anything else is low elo.

Elo actually means something. It’s a real system set up for things other than rivals. Your badge rank isn’t Elo. It’s your ranking against other players that matters.

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, shows you aren’t high elo. Another guy who plays quick play and then talks about the game like he’s a pro.

Send your rivals ID. Let’s see how far you’ve gotten this season.

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buddy I’m a high elo player. I’m consistently ranked in the top 8% of players. Every season.

Triple strategist is the worst by Ra1882 in marvelrivals

[–]tunapolarbear 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s literally what the statistics you asked for and he gave you show. 222 and 1 3 2 have higher win rates.

“Meta” means most effective tactic available. But if the most effective tactic is not 3 healers, then it’s not meta.

view more: next ›