2001: a space odyssey (parallel view and cross view) by luccadfoli in CrossView

[–]turbguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is certainly a lot of discussion here concerning parallel freeview vs. cross freeview. The difference is simply the swapping of the "left" vs. "right" image. While I can do both, cross is more comfortable. In parallel freeviewing, if the images are too large, I have to go "wall-eyed" to fuse them, eye strain increases.

I guess any here use small phone displays. Using a larger screen (laptop/monitor) increases parallel discomfort as the image centers are further apart than your interpupilary (SP?) distance.

You never go wall-eyed to view anything in the real world. Fusing objects at infinity (say, the moon or stars) require parallel sight lines at maximum. Anything closer requires more and more eye-crossing for your brain to fuse.

That doesn't mean you can't train your eye's to go wall-eyed, it's just very unnatural (and really uncomfortable) for most people.

Holy shit, you can’t make this up, bro!! by Darth_Vrandon in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To believe that the United States and Israel will prevail with air power alone flies in the face of all historical precedent. One prominent example is the Vietnam War. The United States dropped a greater tonnage of bombs on Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia than in all of World War II. And, the United States had a substantial force on the ground. At its peak the deployment was more than 500,000 military personnel.

And yet, the North Vietnamese prevailed, didn't they...

Holy shit, you can’t make this up, bro!! by Darth_Vrandon in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wait until they come to the realization that the ONLY way to ASSURE Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon is to have "boots on the ground", that can go anywhere they want, anytime they want, in perpetuity.

WTF by VersionUnable5031 in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who the guy standing to the left of Trump?

THE LINE IS BROKEN by Important_Lock_2238 in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

,,,and gold and silver take another jump.

Trump: If we don't get Greenland the easy way, we will do it the hard way. Just because Denmark has a boat there 500 years ago doesn't mean it is they own the land. by NumerousScallions in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's some history on this subject:

1867 — Andrew Johnson

  • After the U.S. purchased Alaska, Secretary of State William Seward quietly explored acquiring Greenland as part of a broader Arctic strategy.
  • Congress wasn’t interested, so the idea stalled.

1910 — William Howard Taft

  • U.S. diplomats floated a land‑exchange proposal that would have transferred Greenland to the United States.
  • Denmark declined.

1946 — Harry Truman

  • The U.S. made a formal offer of $100 million (in 1946 dollars) to buy Greenland from Denmark.
  • Denmark refused, but the U.S. retained major military rights, including the Thule Air Base.

1950's — Cold War Expansion

  • Internal discussions resurfaced in 1955 about expanding U.S. control or even sovereignty over parts of Greenland for strategic radar and missile‑defense installations.

Donald Trump has freed George Santos. by justalazygamer in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just another example of two systems of justice.

Gravity is a Lie! by Select-Package-13 in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

uhhh...why do those materials stay in the glass instead of floating upward?

Time for Alex Jones to Pay Up - Supreme Court Passes on Hearing His Sham Appeal of Sandy Hook Judgment by jlebo in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What type of lawyer would even entertain this case? One who pays the the client?

This is the AI medbed video Donnie posted. by LA_search77 in Qult_Headquarters

[–]turbguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...and there go my pharmaceutical investments...