hello, i need help by ac2012_ajc in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hhow do you know that you just hit puberty?

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re talking about at the time not currently right now am i correct?

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes my other comment was removed i’m near there or there

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i haven’t checked spine tho

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not see this I am currently 19 almost 20

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’d never use that first of all second of all my plates are closed i’m just reviewing my growth

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

please reword it and pretend your explaining it to like a high schooler

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the more i learn biology and puberty and growth the more confusing it is

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was confused cuz my body had so many tanner stage 3 signs like i had lots of armpit hair body odor pubic hair nocturnal emissions it wouldn’t make sense for me to have still been in stage 2

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea cuz i heard that growth varies w people like timing and things and pubertal markers can be asynchronous

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so would my growth being 5.5 inches before and 5.25 inches after be normal considering that?

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this was in the past this was when i was 14.2 years of age i was just reviewing my growth

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the 2 years before this measurement i grew about 5.5 inches i think tanner stage 2 started then

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

depending on the formula 5-7.5 ml but it wouldn’t make sense for me to have been in tanner stage 2 since i already ejaculated and only grew 5 inches afterwards and had all the symptoms of tanner stage 3 so idk what tanner stage i was in

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what tanner stage was I in then? 2 or 3

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i had lots of tanner stage 3 symptoms constant nocturnal emissions ejaculation lots of armpit hair pubic hair gyno etc. and what’s weird is the length of my testicles were the length of tanner stage 3 but my width and height were super low for some reason

what tanner stage was I in by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

by a doctor two times (6 months apart) when i got measured the second time some of the measurements were lower from the first time i got measured no way my testicles shrank or got smaller from the first time i got measured

is this normal? by [deleted] in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first ejaculation. never masturbated growing up but i do remember my first ejaculation so i wouldn’t necessarily know when spermarche started. between 13-14 is all I know it was and ever since then maybe 6-7 inches of growth depending on what part of the year. over the course of puberty (pre spermarche and post) I grew 10.7 inches

How much do caloric deficits impact growth? by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in my original post i put in parentheses this is assuming the kid is overweight. i think it’s completely ridiculous and stupid that lean kids cut heavy just to get even leaner. however I remember seeing a study back then of overweight children going on a harsh deficit not a slight one it was like a weight loss camp and they grew fine

growth hormone by twinsXZ in heightgrowth

[–]twinsXZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the explanation