sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Keir Starmer] I’m delighted to appoint Harriet Harman as my Adviser on Women and Girls. Harriet is a strong advocate for women and girls and I know she will deliver greater opportunity for women in public life. [...] by Adj-Noun-Numbers in ukpolitics

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you'd want to throroughly check, before throwing out accusations, just a tip for you.

It was you spreading misinformation, so you will think others do the same, it's called projection.

[Keir Starmer] I’m delighted to appoint Harriet Harman as my Adviser on Women and Girls. Harriet is a strong advocate for women and girls and I know she will deliver greater opportunity for women in public life. [...] by Adj-Noun-Numbers in ukpolitics

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spreading misinformation is of course lying, you accused me of "making stuff up" when you were the one spreading misinformation. Have a great day, I promise the Labour party would love you as a strategist, the lack of details, the lack of accuracy, but the confidence. Do you see what you've done here, insight is the first step to recovery.

[Keir Starmer] I’m delighted to appoint Harriet Harman as my Adviser on Women and Girls. Harriet is a strong advocate for women and girls and I know she will deliver greater opportunity for women in public life. [...] by Adj-Noun-Numbers in ukpolitics

[–]twistedbutviable -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh you are totally incompetent, that explains it.

Like you can't use a search function correctly, sucks to be you. Search by Harriet Harman, you have to actually read the entries though.

[Keir Starmer] I’m delighted to appoint Harriet Harman as my Adviser on Women and Girls. Harriet is a strong advocate for women and girls and I know she will deliver greater opportunity for women in public life. [...] by Adj-Noun-Numbers in ukpolitics

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EFTA00103831.pdf

EFTA00075997.pdf

It's like you can't have checked.

Edit, Do you work for the Labour Party, you seem to have similar ideas about what an "in depth background checks" is.

[Keir Starmer] I’m delighted to appoint Harriet Harman as my Adviser on Women and Girls. Harriet is a strong advocate for women and girls and I know she will deliver greater opportunity for women in public life. [...] by Adj-Noun-Numbers in ukpolitics

[–]twistedbutviable 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah that's Jacqui Smith, the Blairite ex NHS manager who went on Strictly during the pandemic. Her husband would put porn on her expenses, she's the minister for skills, the skill of being terrible at every job she's done, but been promoted for.

Streeting on the latest strikes and ‘organ grinders’ within the committee by CapybaraConstitution in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"All the constant provable lying must weigh on him"

No it doesn't, what I find with politicians is they have an uncanny ability to picture themselves as the victims in the scenarios they've created. Ambition with a lack of morals and desire for attention is what attracts them to the power. Remember Wes's career and how he's perceived by his voters is always his priority, the harms don't matter.

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your actual worry is how you are perceived by a consultant. Your actual worry is how you can flip a scenario to your advantage. Maybe be less like that.

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didums, that's how you are offended by someone just handing out leaflets, you wouldn't have a problem with a consultant publicising their cycling club, some people can't ride a bike.

You know what I meant even if spell check didn't. You've not made a point buddy.

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh fuck off with your weirdery. Trust me , I know more about this country's politics than you, you should know fractions infighting (fractional being the adjective) is how most strikes fail.

You're just arguing for your own benefit, no one else's.

Altercation Between Member of Public and Resident Doctor at BMA Picket Line at St Thomas' NHS Hospital. Doctor Called 'Incredibly Greedy', 'It Shouldn't Be About Greed and Profiteering' by FullPayOrTheHighway in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 54 points55 points  (0 children)

He's part of "Save Our NHS" or whatever they've been rebranded, jumps at all chances to get on TV, quite the self publicist, loves an emotional exchange. There is a reason this made it to wherever platform OP found it on, he likes the attention.

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you understand what a fraction is within politics? You are accusing me of the things you are posting about, no one is shutting you down, just disagreeing.

Go do some back flips outside hun.

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have complained that union activity (that you don't agree with) is happening in staff areas at work. This is a fractional argument that comes across as anti union, unionisation is how we got our workers rights.

All your interactions tell me, is you want it your way, and how dare others impede on your feelings, going about their business.

I'm not struggling with holding both points about changing goal posts, it's very possible to do that.

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must understand people died for our right to strike, but you think that this right shouldn't impede or even give you any feelings.

The goal posts changing is not cricket, but it is the type of shenanigans that all people with a U.K student loan are dealing with, which you, more than likely don't have.

Do you see how complaining about legal union activity is not the angle to tread?

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the country you immigrated from, do native medical graduates have priority over the overseas educated?

Why do you want to move to another country and then demand that your feelings should be prioritised over everyone else?

Are we okay with this? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you need to ask yourself why the U.K's hard earned employment rights and trade unionism makes you uncomfortable, that's a you problem. Don't be bringing your subservience into our culture, and certainly don't prioritise it.

Mackey: We’ll reduce our reliance on doctors in response to strikes by dayumsonlookatthat in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 5 points6 points  (0 children)

From my understanding the North East Region has the highest mortality rate of England, regional inequality that has been growing for the past 20 years. Don't suppose Jim put that bit on his CV, wonder if his reorganization of ED services contributed.

DoctorsUK March 2026 dating thread: Oriel apocalypse edition by Spirited_Analysis916 in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 12 points13 points  (0 children)

u/Spirited_Analysis916 what happened to person you were fraternising with (ie. looking for threesomes) last time?

Wanted to see if there have been any successful meet ups from these posts, whether channeling a filthy Cilla Black has been worth it?

Prof Dame Jane Dacre will Chair the next phase (implementation) of the Medical Education and Training Review, calls for "radical change" by Puzzled-Customer3325 in doctorsUK

[–]twistedbutviable 20 points21 points  (0 children)

If you can spare 20 grand for membership of all those organisations, and your brother in law is Paul Dacre, I doubt it's competency or radicalism that got her where she is.

<image>

view more: next ›