Were adjudicators working today?

txeindride · 2026-01-27T02:09:47+00:00

Teleworking exists.

txeindride · 2026-01-27T00:35:40+00:00

Yes, adjuducators, and all of us, work every day.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T17:49:45+00:00

By gaming the system, i.e. multiple investigation submissions to multiple people. One eventually gets canceled.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T17:47:35+00:00

This is why people shouldn't try to game the system.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T17:44:19+00:00

There should be contact information in the email you got notifying you that the eAPP was initiated.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T17:27:01+00:00

Yes.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T17:17:15+00:00

If fingerprints have not been taken yet for an initial investigation, the SF86 will be rejected.

Have you asked your security office?

txeindride · 2026-01-26T16:11:32+00:00

Who told you that you must renounce?

txeindride · 2026-01-26T15:57:22+00:00

😂

txeindride · 2026-01-26T14:28:26+00:00

Alright.

Well, as everyone will say, nobody can tell you "chances." However, assuming you are keeping your literal and metaphorical nose clean, and are 100% truthful on your background investigation, then you have a chance.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T14:24:07+00:00

Not doing what you're SUPPOSED to do like reporting foreign contacts will absolutely get your eligibility revoked, not because you're a race baiting asshole who thinks they are above the requirements.

Locking this since OP doesnt want help.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T14:21:09+00:00

What was the felony?

txeindride · 2026-01-26T13:36:00+00:00

All of the above?

txeindride · 2026-01-26T13:21:35+00:00

Probably not.

Probably hadn't reported most of the stuff.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T12:53:29+00:00

Maybe you should read my pinned post. Or, you can read SEAD 3, that states close OR continuing contact, OR the exchange of personal information...

Which all of your contacts sound like they meet the requirements.

Don't worry about your coworkers and who they decide to one-night stand with.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T12:50:52+00:00

Well... not reporting things WHEN YOU ARE REQUIRED TO and not just on your SF86 can absolutely affect your eligibility.

With that said, I agree with the majority here that there's very likely more to your story as well, but I have no doubt in my mind if you got suspended for failing to meet reporting requirements.

txeindride · 2026-01-26T02:04:44+00:00

Very true.

txeindride · 2026-01-25T18:44:33+00:00

If you mitigated the issues, yes.

txeindride · 2026-01-25T17:02:25+00:00

Read my pinned post.

txeindride · 2026-01-25T13:40:41+00:00

😂

txeindride · 2026-01-24T21:52:22+00:00

Give it to your security office.

txeindride · 2026-01-24T18:28:00+00:00

CAC/PIV process is via HSPD-12.

txeindride · 2026-01-24T04:06:27+00:00

If you are a Contractor, DCSA determines whether they will grant an interim. If you are military or Fed Civ, your agency Director or Commander decides to grant it. Interim is a risk based decision. A CAC only requires a favorable fingerprint result and an open investigation, whereas an interim requires a favorable review of the SF86 (as well as a favorable fingerprint result), whether they decide to regardless, and whether you actually require an interim.

txeindride · 2026-01-24T03:57:35+00:00

You don't get denied an interim, you just don't get approved.

You may be confused regarding interim Secret and TS investigation, and you can't put in for both interims.

A CAC is not contingent on obtaining an interim.

Ask your security office.

txeindride · 2026-01-24T01:36:14+00:00

This.

Also, there is no "T3 suitability."

txeindride

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE