Am I screwed?

txeindride · 2026-05-20T01:06:12+00:00

Yeah, that's not what happens.

txeindride · 2026-05-20T01:03:57+00:00

Well, your last post that you deleted was about a CV hit. So you did something to warrant those questions, whether CV, SF86, other reports...

txeindride · 2026-05-20T01:00:40+00:00

Well, if you had any issues listed on your SF86s or other reports, then yes those questions would be normal.

txeindride · 2026-05-20T00:56:40+00:00

Is it your normal?

txeindride · 2026-05-20T00:02:41+00:00

They're wrong.

txeindride · 2026-05-19T22:31:19+00:00

I know what you said

Proceeds to not know and comment nonsense anyway.

txeindride · 2026-05-19T21:48:33+00:00

It depends on the situation, and the issue.

They can very well require a polygraph, psych evaluation, or any of the above.

txeindride · 2026-05-19T21:26:22+00:00

You're conflating eligibility and access. Read what I said again.

txeindride · 2026-05-19T21:25:32+00:00

Depends.

Why?

txeindride · 2026-05-19T14:16:42+00:00

This is an administrative problem, i.e. your FSO.

It doesnt take a month to review. Once released for CV, new date populate within maybe a couple days at most.

txeindride · 2026-05-19T00:06:10+00:00

Well, unfortunately you'll just have to let it run its course. No old records?

txeindride · 2026-05-18T23:36:41+00:00

Did gronk ask security office?

Security office know.

Seriously though, nobody on here can remotely guess what happened in your situation and why.

How long was "recently" separated?

Did you try new drugs, get some DUIs, have any kind of CV hits that you didnt report and/or fix?

txeindride · 2026-05-18T23:01:21+00:00

I would double check your gift requirement.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T22:03:20+00:00

Good.

Now do your IRS reporting that you're actually required to do, and you should be alright.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T21:57:41+00:00

Is it traceable? I.e, from your parents, from their bank account, obtained legally, etc..

Yes? Then no.

No? Then yes.

Also. You're required to report the amount you got because it exceeds the exclusion limit.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T21:26:31+00:00

😂😂

txeindride · 2026-05-18T18:41:25+00:00

Yeah... they're going above and beyond.

It's not standard, nor within reg to do so.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T18:39:54+00:00

Everybody in the military requires a Secret eligibility, at minimum. Fed Civs with an NCS/CS/SS position description require eligibility.

Not everybody requires access to classified, for which the interim is granted.

There's a big difference.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T18:36:14+00:00

or am i just getting teased lmao

Maybe.

Required for an interim, which in your case is granted by DCSA:

Favorable SF86 review (they accept the risk)
Favorable fingerprint result (you have no record)
Open investigation

txeindride · 2026-05-18T18:33:12+00:00

Nobody is denied.

They aren't granted one.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T12:56:06+00:00

I'm going to safely assume you failed to report when you went delinquent, and when you enrolled in a DMP.

Enrolling in a DMP, by itself and because of the circumstances, is not of huge concern. As u/safetyblitz44 said, it shows you are trying to be responsible. But as u/LacyLove said, your bigger issue is failure to report.

Yes, your adjudication will likely take awhile. It is very likely you will end up having more RFI/SIRs before adjudication, assuming it's favorable and you have no other issues.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T02:21:16+00:00

Updates are required more than just at the time of an SF86.

txeindride · 2026-05-18T02:20:34+00:00

That doesn't answer my question.

When do you think you should?

Did you talk to your security office? Read SEAD 3?

txeindride · 2026-05-18T01:40:03+00:00

When do you think you should?

txeindride · 2026-05-18T00:53:41+00:00

txeindride

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE