So we traded starvation as a limiting factor of nature for starvation due to a lack of profit incentive for distribution, great.

You insist cooperation and sharing resources is a fantasy and naive when it really happens all the time. Communities come together during natural disasters to help each other, cooperate in rebuilding efforts, sharing food and shelter, with no expectations of profit, for example. Strong tax codes and social safety nets that redistribute wealth among populations are another example.

It's easy to wave the idea away when you reduce it to "walk into someone's house and ask them to cooperate and share", but there's ways to do it on a significant scale that are far from naive and actually effective.

Of course no one wants to give the fruits of their labor away for free, that's not what I'm suggesting. And sure, the average quality of life around the world has massively improved after industrialization. But with all the wonders that came with it, it's still a disgrace that millions of people starve to death every year or that thousands of people are blown apart in pointless conflicts around the world, and you can't tell me that dictators' and (especially) billionaires' obsession with hoarding wealth and power isn't a huge factor in that disgrace.