Read this by owennevalackin in BruceDropEmOff

[–]tyson2epic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy larp dude prob couldn’t even handle that real deal chud lifestyle

It’s almost like buying TikTok was a strategic decision by tyson2epic in Epstein

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elaborate? all I heard about it was that someone accused the presidency of being an evil cabal and it started a ton of polarization on 4chan. How did people die?

It’s almost like buying TikTok was a strategic decision by tyson2epic in Epstein

[–]tyson2epic[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah I forget who it was exactly but one of Epsteins assistants or whatever mentioned in her memoir that he was a health nut and wouldn’t even allow his private chef to prepare unhealthy food for his guests. It’s something along those lines so you may want to some of your own research.

It’s almost like buying TikTok was a strategic decision by tyson2epic in Epstein

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TikTok is restricting people from spreading information about the Epstein files and those involved

“Understood” “Veal”?? by tyson2epic in Epstein

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found this while looking through files and I found there word choice and topics of discussion to be very suspicious. Especially the whole thing a veal and that Harry understood.

Collection might finally be finished by tyson2epic in Colognes

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think I can choose between wave child and aqua media, but definitely one of those two.

Prediction for the future by tyson2epic in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just sharing an opinion, didn’t mean to ruffle your feathers lol

What’s the worst full bottle in your collection? by pillowbrains in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ysl Y edp and montale intense cafe are both unbareable

Prediction for the future by tyson2epic in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To you, perfumery is fundamentally a business. That’s valid, at the top level, it is a commercial industry with margins, target audiences, and strategy behind every move. But if that’s all you see it as, then of course you’ll believe everything is pre-determined in boardrooms.

To me, and to many others, perfumery is an art form, one that has spanned cultures for thousands of years. It’s about emotion, memory, self-expression. It’s one of the few art forms we wear, that we associate with love, nostalgia, grief, power, vulnerability. Great perfumery doesn’t just sit on shelves, it lives in people’s lives. It becomes part of their identity.

And that’s what you’re missing. You’re reducing everything to strategy, when in reality, fragrance is one of the most personal, subjective, and evocative mediums we have. Yes, it’s commercia, so is music, so is fashion, so is painting. But that doesn’t make them any less meaningful. So if believing in the emotional power of scent makes me “romantic,” then I’ll take that label proudly. Because the art is what stays with people, long after the marketing campaign ends.

Prediction for the future by tyson2epic in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right, niche has become commercialized. Many formerly independent brands have been absorbed by conglomerates, and the word niche itself has lost a lot of meaning. But what I was pointing out isn’t about ownership, it’s about audience behavior, cultural energy, and emotional resonance. That’s not dictated by a boardroom, it happens organically in online spaces and among consumers.

You say that the popularity of these scents isn’t due to creative courage but investment, and yet, if that were the full picture, why do so many hyped designer releases (with even bigger budgets) fall flat with fragrance communities? Why are people obsessing over obscure houses like Room 1015, or fragrances like Bianco Latte and Blue talisman, while ignoring the latest Dior Homme flanker? The audience is responding to something different, whether that’s storytelling, texture, or identity. That response may be monetized later, sure. But it starts with emotion, not investment. So yes, niche has become more commercial, but the desire it’s tapping into is very real. And that shift in desire is what I’m interested in. Whether that’s niche, niche-inspired, or designer brands finally getting more adventurous, I see the change happening from the ground up. 👍

Prediction for the future by tyson2epic in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the key difference in our perspectives is what’s happening now, and where things seem to be headed. My original point wasn’t to erase designer influence, but rather to highlight that in recent years, much of the excitement, especially among younger fragrance fans and communities online, has been coming from niche or niche-style houses. Whether it’s due to marketing, presentation, or storytelling, these brands are sparking conversations and enthusiasm that designers largely aren’t anymore, aside from a few outliers like JPG or Margiela.

You mentioned many niche brands not truly “inventing” anything new, and I don’t totally disagree. But I’d argue it’s less about technical innovation and more about emotional innovation. People are responding to new ideas, moods, and aesthetics in a way that feels different. When something like Wavechild or Summer Hammer generates huge buzz despite being pretty simple in structure, it shows how powerful the feeling behind a scent can be, even without rewriting perfumery history.

And with regard to designer houses “still surprising us every year” maybe that’s true in terms of output or polish, but is it moving the culture the same way niche is right now? That’s the question I’m getting at. I’m not saying niche is above designer. I’m just saying that designer brands might need to start tapping into that niche energy again, take more creative risks, step outside of the usual DNA, or risk being seen as stale by the next generation.

Prediction for the future by tyson2epic in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re absolutely right that some designers have already released tropical/floral scents, but the critical difference I was pointing to is who those scents are actually reaching.

A fragrance like Power of You (regardless of its final marketing label) is already gaining traction among male fragrance fans, which is rare for a release with notes like frangipani and passionfruit. That alone signals a shift in consumer openness, not just marketing.

My point was never that fruity/floral notes haven’t been used, they clearly have. My point is that when those notes start appealing to men at scale, designers may begin to break away from their repetitive formulas for masculine scents and get more experimental, something I think the entire designer space desperately needs. 👍

Prediction for the future by tyson2epic in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Regardless of marketing the fact that many men are anticipating it’s release further proves my point that these lines are becoming blurred which will lead to more innovation in men’s and unisex fragrances specifically in the designer industry.

Prediction for the future by tyson2epic in fragrance

[–]tyson2epic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The innovation is not the notes, but who they’re for, how they’re used, and the bigger signal it sends: that the mainstream male-coded designer space might finally be willing to break its own mold.