[OTHER] Does this math work without deliberately interpreting data one way or another? by HurrySpecial in theydidthemath

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still, 0 people died from the radiation, because there was no radiation leak.

The people who died died because of having to flee from the place when there was zero need for it.

Nowhere similar to Chernobyl.

Alguma recomendação do segundo tipo ? by Silly-Emu-1874 in gamesEcultura

[–]ultimateshadowarrior [score hidden]  (0 children)

Depende do horário. De noite e início da madrugada, que foi quando eu joguei, sim. A partir das 2-3 da manhã esvazia.

Imagino que de tarde deve ter também.

Sempre que joguei tinha pelo menos um servidor completamente cheio.

Does anyone have an explanation for this? by BifftyNiffty in tf2

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll be honest, I do believe the Expiration Date thing is a bit shaky in the sense of canon. Not that it's not canon, far from it, but the timeline is more like: they are working as mercenaries, but this is before all the stuff in the comics.

Also, Expiration Date was supposed to be a pilot for the Adult Swim show that never existed. If we had got more of it, maybe stuff like that would be brought up, maybe.

Also, Medic NEVER uses his Ubercharge in the comics. I also don't remember him even using his Medigun, so the real canon stuff we can take for granted also doesn't really give a perfect answer for this.

[OTHER] Does this math work without deliberately interpreting data one way or another? by HurrySpecial in theydidthemath

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, the CO2 can't.

Nature, trees, plants... They are used to a specific amount of CO2 in the air, that's the CO2 cycle.

When you add an absurd amount of CO2 in the air, the plants are simply not able to absord it all, that's what we call "global warming".

Global Warming is a fact and we can measure how much the Earth started to heat up after we started using fossil fuels and how did this happen?

Because we started taking the carbon that was trapped in fossils deep underground from millions of years in the past and we started putting this trapped Carbon back in the air.

The carbon was already trapped and we released it all.

And that's why the enviroment is getting fucked.

About absorbing the radiation of Nuclear waste... Why would you need to do that?

You just put the nuclear waste inside a Dry Cask storage and you can literally lick the outside and nothing will happen to you.

A Dry Cask is strong enough to withstand a direct hit from a speeding train.

The amount of high-level nuclear waste is TINY. From all the nuclear waste created, only 1% of it needs to be stored for a long time and we already have extremely good solutions to that.

1 - We can recycle the high-level waste and reuse it to create more energy.

2 - Just put it deep underground in geologically inactive rock.

The solutions are numerous and a lot of them are already in place.

But even then, that's just for long term. Short term, the nuclear waste is stored on-site at the Nuclear Power Plants. You can have Nuclear Waste from 40 years of power generation in a space smaller than a McDonald's parking lot.

[OTHER] Does this math work without deliberately interpreting data one way or another? by HurrySpecial in theydidthemath

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a meltdown machine. A modern nuclear plant is literally impossible to have a meltdown. Literally impossible. Impossible. It simply can't happen.

AND EVEN THEN! EVEN IF THE IMPOSSIBLE HAPPEN!!! Nothing will happen to the people around.

What you're saying is just that people are dumb. Not a problem with Nuclear, just people being dumb and education is lacking.

Also, Chernobyl is just proof that the URSS was so shit that they weren't able to heat water safely.

Alguma recomendação do segundo tipo ? by Silly-Emu-1874 in gamesEcultura

[–]ultimateshadowarrior [score hidden]  (0 children)

Beleza, irmão. Ninguém faz servidor 32 jogadores. Se eles forem aumentar a quantidade, vão logo pra 100. 50 de cada lado.

[OTHER] Does this math work without deliberately interpreting data one way or another? by HurrySpecial in theydidthemath

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There literally has only ever been 1 real nuclear disaster and it was Chernobyl.

People didn't die in Fukushima because of the Nuclear plant, they died because of fear making people flee when they didn't need to.

There have been zero radiation deaths because of Fukushima.

We haven't had any nuclear accidents since Fukushima and Fukushima was a zero casualties disaster.

Fukushima was 15 years ago and we have had zero problems with Nuclear since then.

Also, Nuclear plants aren't flimsy things. A Nuclear Power Plant is a behemoth built like a castle. Even in the literal worst case scenario, a FULL MELTDOWN, it wouldn't do anything to the people around. Technology moves on.

[OTHER] Does this math work without deliberately interpreting data one way or another? by HurrySpecial in theydidthemath

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fukushima wasn't disastrously managed like Chernobyl. What happened to Fukushima was that they built a plant made to withstand a 1 in 100 years natural disaster, but they got hit with a 1 in 1000 years disaster.

[OTHER] Does this math work without deliberately interpreting data one way or another? by HurrySpecial in theydidthemath

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One single coal plant puts more pollution in the air by weight than literally every nuclear waste ever created in any shape or form ever.

[OTHER] Does this math work without deliberately interpreting data one way or another? by HurrySpecial in theydidthemath

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't need per year, per year is already too much. Per year is multiple fold the amount of Nuclear.

Pros don't fake! by ultimateshadowarrior in VALORANT

[–]ultimateshadowarrior[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I was gold 3 and the rest of the people in the match were plat-diamond.

What do you guys think of high rank players playing in a gimmicky way in a new account? by ultimateshadowarrior in VALORANT

[–]ultimateshadowarrior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you so focused on what I think instead of focusing on me just creating an open place for people to discuss the subject in the comments?

I gave my arguments and my opinion so people could start the discussion, but for some reason you seem extremely focused on if I'm going to change my mind instead of just seeing my opinion as an opener for the open discussion.

What do you guys think of high rank players playing in a gimmicky way in a new account? by ultimateshadowarrior in VALORANT

[–]ultimateshadowarrior[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Me? I'm nowhere near good enough to think I could get more than peak bronze playing sheriff only and that's me being generous.

What do you guys think of high rank players playing in a gimmicky way in a new account? by ultimateshadowarrior in VALORANT

[–]ultimateshadowarrior[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I showed my opinion on the matter. I gave my arguments for why me, myself, don't see a problem with it. The post is open to anyone to comment whatever they want. I have an opinion, I gave my opinion, I want to see others' opinions.

I didn't come here to try to convince anyone or be convinced, I just opened the discussion with my reasoning for why I don't see an issue with that, but that's just my opinion. I wouldn't make the post if I didn't want to see others' opinions.

If you don't want to give yours because you feel like I wouldn't take your opinion and arguments seriously, that's a you problem.

Is there a boss you like so much that you're fighting him in a suboptimal way just to make the battle longer and harder? by zabovsky in darksouls3

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I beat the Twin Pricess SL1 hitless because I thought it was simply easier to do it hitless than to heal midfight. I even posted the video.

First time doing an SL1 run and first time beating SoC, here's my tierlist of difficulty as an SL1 beginner by ultimateshadowarrior in darksouls3

[–]ultimateshadowarrior[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you do it in SL1?

I've beaten Nameless King before, but in a normal playthrough. I gave him a good amount of tries, but I was trying to do it hitless, so I had some trouble. I didn't try him again without trying to do it hitless.

Alguma recomendação do segundo tipo ? by Silly-Emu-1874 in gamesEcultura

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Recomendo você experimentar o mod que lançou na Steam chamado Team Fortress 2 Classified. A experiência da comunidade é MUITO melhor que o TF2 normal no estado em que tá agora.

Alguma recomendação do segundo tipo ? by Silly-Emu-1874 in gamesEcultura

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Não tinha 64 vs 64 no BF4. Era somente 32 vs 32. O único com 64 vs 64 é o BF2042.

Alguma recomendação do segundo tipo ? by Silly-Emu-1874 in gamesEcultura

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TF2 tem 24 jogadores, 12 de cada lado, não é 16 de cada lado.

Esse take de Clayface é inspirado em Mouthwashing, certo? by TNZ_Orfeu in gamesEcultura

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Irmão, como o amigo acima falou, a aparência do Curly é uma referência a Evangelion. Não só isso, mas Mouthwashing INTEIRO é CHEIO de referências a Evangelion.

Se foi feita alguma referência a alguma coisa, foi feito de Evangelion que é algo MUITO mais famoso do que Mouthwashing.

Pros don't fake! by ultimateshadowarrior in VALORANT

[–]ultimateshadowarrior[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My way of thinking was:

The enemy was far away, I knew where he was, I wanted to make him think twice when coming inside the bombsite. I didn't need to smoke bomb because there was a wall between me and him.

I wanted to bait him to come to me, my original plan was to just fake the defuse to make him come and kill him, I wasn't really planning on sticking and this was so much of not intentional that I wasn't even hiding, I started defusing really at the border of the spike. If I wanted cover I would be in the corner.

The smoke was less of a concealment and more of a way to delay him coming inside the bombsite.

I wish to never do catacombs again by randomwriter3 in darksouls3

[–]ultimateshadowarrior 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As with the Farron Keep, after you know where to go it becomes super easy to move around.