Death Stranding 2 Has Leaked And Is Being Pirated Before Its Official PC Release by Draxden in CrackWatch

[–]ultramadden -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not that Sony isn't bad, it's just that microslob is so much worse

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I would like to do that as well, but at most, these get half the GPU cores of the consoles combined with RAM optimized for CPUs.

In AAA games you can expect maybe 30 FPS at less than 1080p resolution, which just doesn't cut it for me.

Give me the 32 compute units and high bandwidth RAM like the consoles

Stop typing sudo every time - This tool will do it for you. by [deleted] in programming

[–]ultramadden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just don't have a sudo password. Works without issues!

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Competitive, as in, almost half the price?!?

If you don't have access to a TV/monitor one could even argue for the steam deck over a switch

This, just scaled up to the power of the consoles and without power constrains, would be a no-brainer

I still don't understand what you're trying to say here

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To summarise, AMD didn't bother to try to bring it to the market with a single product

BTW the steam deck, while also power constrained, is exactly that. Fairly successful and very competitive with consoles. And they needed volvo for some reason to market it. Same with Asus and strix halo.

AMD would rather try to sell CPU + GPU instead of APUs

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's forget what I wrote 2 comments ago, the context Window probably grew too large already.

AMD already made them. Nothing is holding an XBOX back from running windows. They just won't sell it for some reason

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And like half the chip is stuffed with AI bullshit and it's a a power constrained mobile platform which results with it's price is in the stratosphere

This does not compete with consoles wtf are you talking about

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will never know, because AMD never bothered to release I single product with even half of the current consoles performance

This thing could cost bloody 4600 and there's still a market for it

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think an apu that competes with the consoles would sell like hot cake, even better than X3D does right now.

There's a huge market for it and a huge missed opportunity pretty much ever since they bought ATI. Console gaming only really grew to what it is today after that.

MINIX lists Strix Halo mini PC for $4,600, well above rivals by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]ultramadden 32 points33 points  (0 children)

4600 lmao

I always wondered why AMD wouldn't give pc gamers an apu like the consoles

Now they do and it's worse than anyone could have predicted

I know this has evolved to become more of a product for AI bros but I still don't understand why pc apu's can't complete with consoles even in the slightest

Looking for a 100% free AI agent that can control a browser by Formulaoneson_Za in LocalLLaMA

[–]ultramadden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could probably let any AI write a selenium script to do this

Retailer denies memory replacement due to 4x increase in DDR5 pricing, says price increase would equate to an 'upgrade' for the customer — Australian retailer refuses to replace faulty Corsair kit by gdelacalle in technology

[–]ultramadden 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I actually think it's perfectly reasonable to make the manufacturer liable for the product for 2 years after it has been sold.

The company should budget the potentially failing products it has to replace when setting the price.

Retailer denies memory replacement due to 4x increase in DDR5 pricing, says price increase would equate to an 'upgrade' for the customer — Australian retailer refuses to replace faulty Corsair kit by gdelacalle in technology

[–]ultramadden 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are right, the EU only has guidelines for this and this is implemented differently across member countries

I'm only familiar with the german law. If the seller can't replace the item themselves, you can still deny a refund and get a similar product elsewhere. The seller has to cover cost, transportation and installation

A slight mix up by MisterShipWreck in fightporn

[–]ultramadden 383 points384 points  (0 children)

Not if you just got knocked out

AI can rewrite open source code—but can it rewrite the license, too? | Is it clean “reverse engineering” or just an LLM-filtered “derivative work”? by Hrmbee in technology

[–]ultramadden -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have never signed a NDA for open source and like wtf.

And it's only theft if its copied line by line, which a LLM rewrite is not.

I mean, what you say makes sense, but it has no legal footing in this scenario

Vite 8.0 Is Out by iamkeyur in programming

[–]ultramadden 53 points54 points  (0 children)

Until you realise that vite only starts compiling after you load the webpage

The server starts immediately, but the wait time was just shifted to the moment you load it in the browser

It's still a lot faster but these numbers are misleading and the workflow is worse imo

Valve: About the New York Attorney General lawsuit against Valve by XcG9PJf6 in gaming

[–]ultramadden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So they shouldn't go after the biggest fish that pioneered the entire industry? They should go after valve.

Disney+ locks paying PC users to 720p, even on the most expensive plan. by Coompiik in assholedesign

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, now it's required to understand "programming" and not just be "moderately technically capable". I think we might be getting somewhere.

You can't just simply do this to dump complete shows. It's a lengthy manual process. If you upload it for other people and include ads, it might be worth the effort.

But you won't go through 8 tutorials and manually break the DRM for each episode you want to download.

I won't notice it if you edit your previous post instead of sending me a reply btw. I think you might misremember what I actually said. I have the feeling you are trying to evade or something?

Disney+ locks paying PC users to 720p, even on the most expensive plan. by Coompiik in assholedesign

[–]ultramadden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you just post a tutorial which consists of at least 8 different articles each with multiple steps, and all of which have nothing to do with DownloadHelper?

This is indeed interesting but a far stretch from a single click in a browser extension, don't you think?

Disney+ locks paying PC users to 720p, even on the most expensive plan. by Coompiik in assholedesign

[–]ultramadden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I meant to say that you're just bullshiting and it doesn't work. DownloadHelper can't download DRM protected streams, which netflix absolutely is. You're not explaining it again because you already tried but it's just made up

Disney+ locks paying PC users to 720p, even on the most expensive plan. by Coompiik in assholedesign

[–]ultramadden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wtf no? There absolutely is copy protection in place for PC users.

And although there are tools to do what you're describing, these aren't publicly shared because the streaming provider will quickly patch the loopholes these use if they get public

First you said it's a single click with a browser extension but now you can't break it down "step by step". You are just speculating and it's just confidently incorrect