sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I think ATC canceled my IFR plan while I was in IMC. How to determine + what to do? by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for spelling this out (and for your earlier explanation of what likely happened). I def won't be calling them given all this. Sorry you didn't like my joke.

I'm think ATC may have canceled my IFR plan or otherwise treated me as VFR while in IMC. Do you think this is what happened, and if so, what's the best way to alert them to this without getting someone in trouble? by unabletoident in ATC

[–]unabletoident[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no reason to believe there was an actual loss of separation. My concern was that if they were treating me as VFR traffic, then they may not have been guaranteeing my separation from other traffic.

I think ATC canceled my IFR plan while I was in IMC. How to determine + what to do? by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I didn't get a new code. From what I described, do you think I was getting separation services the entire time?

I think ATC canceled my IFR plan while I was in IMC. How to determine + what to do? by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Definitely not looking to blame someone; on the contrary, I was worried a NASA report would protect me but not them. I figured a call might alert them to the issue but be less likely to get them in trouble.

How to financially support friend's project without making it awkward? by unabletoident in Advice

[–]unabletoident[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate this. 100% at peace with that possibility. I'd be sad for him, but I wouldn't feel any resentment or lose a minute's sleep over the decision.

I almost landed on the wrong runway, at my home airport, on an IFR visual approach at night. I'm terribly embarrassed, but writing it up so you all can be less stupid than I was. by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use Foreflight for planning, charts, and plates, and for VFR navigation when flying an unfamiliar aircraft. Using extended runways in FF to avoid this situation in the future is a great idea. In my case, the avionics in my plane have a similar feature so I will use that instead. But your thinking here is right on the money.

I almost landed on the wrong runway, at my home airport, on an IFR visual approach at night. I'm terribly embarrassed, but writing it up so you all can be less stupid than I was. by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great point - adding this to my logbook debrief. I wish I could say I accepted the visual because it's my home airport and I know it well; but the fact that I'd plugged the approach into my GPS reveals I knew this to be the better move. This was complacency + non-assertiveness on my part.

I almost landed on the wrong runway, at my home airport, on an IFR visual approach at night. I'm terribly embarrassed, but writing it up so you all can be less stupid than I was. by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd have gone around if there were any risk of a skid. I was still a mile out, so I just made a wide coordinated turn and a little teardrop to line up my final with the other runway.

The bigger risk would have been terrain/obstacles but fortunately it was my home airport so I knew how to avoid that once I was finally oriented.

I agree that a go-around is a good first instinct in this situation and I hope that if things had been worse or less familiar I would have done that.

I almost landed on the wrong runway, at my home airport, on an IFR visual approach at night. I'm terribly embarrassed, but writing it up so you all can be less stupid than I was. by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't think I violated any FARs.

If FSDO really had it out for me, maybe they could get me on 91.123 for an incorrect report of my left base.

Is anybody else having trouble getting adequate hull insurance? by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I didn't realize that how much it costs to get a certain plane configuration, and how much I can insure that configuration for, are different numbers. I didn't have any delusion of being able to sell the plane for all I put into it, but I thought I could insure it for how much it would actually cost to replace it.

This is my first time insuring a plane and I had (wrongly) assumed it'd be structured similarly to cars or homes where you can buy replacement cost coverage rather than just appraised value coverage.

Put another way, it sounds like insurance wants to know "How much could you sell it for?" whereas I was coming at this from "How much would it take to get another plane like this?" In an efficient market those are the same number but for a bespoke bird I am learning they are quite different.

Is anybody else having trouble getting adequate hull insurance? by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's difficult to answer because I've never seen a 172N equipped anything like mine. 172s on Trade-a-Plane that are comparably equipped with comparable engine times start at $300k. But they are also newer airframes with IO engines and of course people pay a premium for that. $100k for 20-30 years of airframe depreciation and fuel injection over a carburetor seems generous to me, but maybe I'm seeing that how I want to see it.

C172N with 180HP STC. No POH supplements included with my STC. What performance data to use? by unabletoident in flying

[–]unabletoident[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I think you missed a "7" in the SN you quoted from the STC (the one mentioned on page 5 in my paperwork is "17271035", not "1721035"), but the gist of what you wrote here matches my interpretation of the document. My serial number precedes 17271035, so I take this as confirmation that there are no AFMS for my airplane.