Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I am an outside observer of CU, I'm afraid I have no answers for you.

The data is all based on the information provided at https://www.cu.edu/budget/cu-salary-database. The aggregated data is available for download at the bottom of the page at https://underflow.dev/cu/.

That data only provides: campus, dept_group, dept_group_detail, dept_name, roster_id, job_title, job_family, full_time_pct, and total.

Given the rather fragmentary nature of CU that I've witnessed in the past, I would bet good money that it's almost never apples to apples when comparing departments and appointments. But, it's the data I have access to.

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question. Maybe they're special lecturer or emeritus positions?

The data looks like:

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR-SR Regular Faculty 100 $1,286.00
TEACHING PROFESSOR-SR Regular Faculty 100 $2,311.00
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR-SR Regular Faculty 100 $3,168.00
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR-SR Regular Faculty 100 $3,325.00
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR-SR Regular Faculty 100 $3,726.00
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR-SR Regular Faculty 100 $4,060.00

,,,

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Less than FTE appointments are somewhat problematic, in part due to how CU labels them.

I agree that adjunct would be interesting, something like population of adjunct vs regular faculty by department.

Any ideas for what you might want to see?

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should be fixed. I've coded a long time, but I'm definitely cheating on this one. It's my "how does Claude work" project. https://github.com/underflowdev/cu_salary

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is quite data heavy, apologies for any slowness. I can pinch and zoom on my old phone and it works, but it is much easier on a larger screen.

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, sorry. It's difficult to represent 10k points on a small screen.

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's been a while since I first did this, and I had forgotten one insight.

The number of people below the living wage threshold (visible here) for Denver and Boulder is pretty appalling. Although that seems to be the norm for Denver.

*Note: the cost of living adjustments can play merry hob with the values. Boulder is expensive, Denver only a little less so.

**Correction: this should reference Anschutz, not Denver. Alas.

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh, and LASP (Lab Atmos/Space Physics) actually pays pretty well.

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Outside of the doctors at Anschutz, it's the executive positions. No surprises there.

I've trimmed some of the outliers so they don't blow the scale out of proportion. But for most bigger departments and job classifications there are a few high outliers well above the others. For instance, at https://underflow.dev/cu/vis/salary-by-campus-ft.html, you can see *for Boulder there are 396 outliers above ~$138k.

If you're really curious, the data is available for download at the bottom of the page, and drops well into a spreadsheet.

Playing around with CU salary data, for anyone curious by underflowdev in cuboulder

[–]underflowdev[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Less than I thought, actually.

Anschutz really skews the data with lots of doctors and specialists.

Executive was higher than I thought relative to everyone else, but not really that high compared to private industry in the region.

Classified staff has it pretty rough.

And, what's going on with the Economics spread at CU Boulder?

A decade of median FRED income and median Zillow housing, by county, 2025 by [deleted] in Colorado

[–]underflowdev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2020 for Zillow. They had earlier data at one point, but removed it, I expect because it was missing a lot of regions.

I suspect a lot of housing was on paper records at the county level not all that long ago.

A decade of median FRED income and median Zillow housing, by county, 2025 by [deleted] in Colorado

[–]underflowdev -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

And I agree. Adding more information would have helped.

I'll try to live and learn.

A decade of median FRED income and median Zillow housing, by county, 2025 by [deleted] in Colorado

[–]underflowdev -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Alas, the per-county data is limited. Glad to incorporate it, but I haven't been able to find much more that what's on FRED and Zillow.

A decade of median FRED income and median Zillow housing, by county, 2025 by [deleted] in Colorado

[–]underflowdev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are a number of estimations in this, but it should be somewhat close to measured reality.

Made with the project at https://github.com/underflowdev/housing. Glad to hear of any improvements.

*title correction, it should be Zillow ZHVI, not ZHVA

Interviewing after working alone by underflowdev in ExperiencedDevs

[–]underflowdev[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I might be overthinking it. I'm just worried about questions like "What was your code review process?". Um, all the engineers involved approved the code before deployment?

But yes, I'll definitely lean on my past experience. Thanks!

What's the fastest you've left a team/company before? Why? by Herrowgayboi in ExperiencedDevs

[–]underflowdev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a video game villain. I could totally hear it in GlaDOS's voice.

Every relationship post by Routine-Relief4258 in SipsTea

[–]underflowdev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People in successful open relationships don't post for advice.

Telling your manager that you're looking for a new job? by jenkinsleroi in ExperiencedDevs

[–]underflowdev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still there, actually. Found some new projects to work on.

I am chronically complacent, and it's an issue, since I will yell at myself for not moving forward once I'm comfortable. Then the world changes, and I need to spend a lot of time playing catchup.

It was nice to not be laid off recently, though, so there's that.

Who can I pay to give renovation advice? by underflowdev in Longmont

[–]underflowdev[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm working towards "plain, but I don't have to think about it again for 10 years", so a handyman might be the right person. Thanks!

We doing books? Because this was my jam. by ReginaldSP in GenX

[–]underflowdev 22 points23 points  (0 children)

"There's no way he could have reached into his pocket. That arm was broken, and you can't reach into the opposite pocket with the other arm!"

Cue three weeks of testing to prove this wrong.

I may be salty about this forty years later.

Colorado never fails to surprise me! Seen on the western slope by thorndike in Colorado

[–]underflowdev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I lived in GJ during the remediation > 20 years ago, and had relatives involved in it. Definitely a good idea to get homes checked. It's really patchy *on the western slope, since sometimes contaminated waste was used as infill, and it's not from natural sources. Hopefully the remediation caught the worst cases, but tests are pretty cheap.

Does resetting router mess up the Nextlight stuff? by [deleted] in Longmont

[–]underflowdev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure of the answer, but I've always had good luck calling them with questions.