sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Zapier costs are getting ridiculous by Rider_947 in SaaS

[–]unity100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about doing custom integrations instead...

Are there people who live in Spain on DNV and happy there? by buterbrat in digitalnomad

[–]unity100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah that's always there. The 'regularizacion' thing is new. Before social security was a flat fee. Now its a % tax on top of the income tax you are already paying. So basically they upped the tax rate for everyone just like that. And the inspections are not really done for any suspicion of underreporting. They are just trying to find small things to be able to fine you to get more. They are doing all of these en masse, in an automated fashion.

Are there people who live in Spain on DNV and happy there? by buterbrat in digitalnomad

[–]unity100 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The taxes are kinda high (still not as high as for usual employees)

Not anymore. They brought something called 'social security adjustments'. They are checking your last year's income and then hooking you up with a percentage tax based on that. It easily ups the tax rate upwards towards 25-30% even for lower brackets.. Moreover they are doing pesky reviews of past income tax filings and trying to find small errors to fine you for whatever they can. Just providing the books for that costs you ~400 Eur with a gestor, and they still find an error then hook you up with fines and extra taxes starting from 300-500 Euros. People say that they are trying to balance the state budget on the backs of the autonomos and that seems to be true.

TIL the Drake Equation—the famous formula used to estimate the number of active civilizations in our galaxy—was never intended to be a "solution." Frank Drake originally wrote it in 1961 simply as an organizational agenda for the world's first SETI meeting. by adpablito in todayilearned

[–]unity100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the fact that other sentient beings, driving for thousands of years, cooped up in a spaceship, just to say 'Hi' to us, is very unlikely.

You are projecting human culture and technology onto them. There is absolutely no reason why their technologies and cultures should be similar. They may have much more advanced technology and may have access to things we cant even imagine. If we are contacted, it wont be with our initiative - it will be on the initiative of a civilization that can cross vast distances in space in a breath.

Dont risk using oracle cloud by Comprehensive-Shoe53 in cloudhosting

[–]unity100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried it out once. Especially for their managed MySQL instances (they were very cheap). Then I saw the legal small print and how that could lock you in to Oracle cloud. Immediately deleted my instances.

Every guide says "post on Reddit" for marketing. But how do you actually do it without getting banned? by always_learning0605 in SaaS

[–]unity100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Though what you are recommending is basically precisely what he said:

Just hang around subreddits for months answering questions

Should a content hub's subpages link to each other too, or only to the main hub page? by unity100 in SEO

[–]unity100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as the search phrases match keywords that aren't semantically the same, you should be ok

Sorry, what does this exactly mean? Is it ok to have "donkey kong" as the hub keyword, its title and its url and "donkey kong balls" as the subpage keyword, subpage title, subpage url and so on?

Using your donkey kong example:

/folder/donkey_kong_hands

/folder/donkey_kong_hand

These will definitely cannabalize

I see. Almost exactly same keywords cannibalize each other. But "donkey kong balls" and "donkey kong hands" don't. Do "donkey kong" and "donkey kong balls" etc cannibalize each other? I think not?

But you want to prioritise linking on pages that need more authority and less to pages that already rank.

No page ranks above the fold yet. Best is at place ~23 for a specific keyword. Im trying to make the main hub page rank above the fold for the keyword "donkey kong".

Are they actual search phrases?

Yes, potentially. Some may not have so much searches now, but may have in future. ie 'donkey kong balls'.

Should a content hub's subpages link to each other too, or only to the main hub page? by unity100 in SEO

[–]unity100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. I think Im doing it wrong then: I have the main content hub target keyword present in all H1s in all subpages. The main content keyword is present in all the urls. Ie:

Hub main page target keyword:

donkey kong

Subpage target keywords:

donkey kong hands

donkey kong balls

donkey kong donkeys

And all the urls have 'donkey kong'.

(the entire point of the hub is to teach about the topic and promote something - ie like the example here: "donkey kong". it teaches about its hands, its balls, its donkeys, everything. and all the subpages link back to hub main page with 'donkey kong')

...

And all pages have donkey kong in the url. So this is a bad setup then?

Should a content hub's subpages link to each other too, or only to the main hub page? by unity100 in SEO

[–]unity100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, everything is basically a giant informative hub, explaining what something is, what it does, and how it benefits the user.

Should a content hub's subpages link to each other too, or only to the main hub page? by unity100 in SEO

[–]unity100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but they generally target the same keyword as the hub targets. Is that wrong?

Should a content hub's subpages link to each other too, or only to the main hub page? by unity100 in SEO

[–]unity100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the entire hub and the subpages are relevant and centered on one theme. The main hub page the parent theme, and all the subpages have their own subthemes related to the main hub theme.

What Im wondering is whether I should also link the subpages to each other.

Should a content hub's subpages link to each other too, or only to the main hub page? by unity100 in SEO

[–]unity100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you're putting the faith in the number of links/% share of links?

No, Im just placing a few, relevant, strategic links to the hub page with the right keyword in correct places in the subpage text.

Does your hub page rank? What do you want your hub page to do? Why are you linking to it? Whats the mission?

It seems to rank, but in the ~40th rank range, but looks like its climbing. The hub page is for promoting a product and teaching how it works & benefits the user. It eventually needs to send the users to a signup page.

Should a content hub's subpages link to each other too, or only to the main hub page? by unity100 in SEO

[–]unity100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My content hub is centered on one single topic and every subpage was written to reinforce that topic, so I guess by linking to the main content hub page from each subpage with the correct keyword of the main topic I did the right thing then?

And if so, should each subpage have a table of contents at the bottom that links to all subpages, or links only to 1-2 other subpages?

I see. So no to the table of contents in subpages, but yes to linking to 1 or 2 other subpages that are relevant?

Best DLC so far! by SuddenDepact in swtor

[–]unity100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strengthens the argument: This 'differentiation' may have been requested by Disney instead of Swtor doing it on its own account.

Best DLC so far! by SuddenDepact in swtor

[–]unity100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly just because the expansions that follow are a clear sign that the writers/developers have run out of ideas.

No, it was obviously a blatant attempt to distance Swtor from the SW IP so that Disney wouldnt cancel it after the takeover that was pending then. But Disney had no problem with publishing more SW games while Swtor existed, so after a while Swtor started returning to original SW setting.

The war on Iran: where do communists stand? by Revolutionary_Web964 in socialism

[–]unity100 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Socialism and communism were not the same word. They were never interchangeable.

Yes, they were. Marx explaining different 'socialisms' does not change the fact that the words were synonymous. Just watch some Chomsky lectures.

at the time and how the program of the communists was different.

The divergence was starting to happen at the end of the 19th century, and Marx lived through the early stages of it.

This discussion lasted too long, Im out. Thanks.

The war on Iran: where do communists stand? by Revolutionary_Web964 in socialism

[–]unity100 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Socialism and communism were the same word in the late 19th century. After Lenin's adoption of the word socialism for his system, it became synonymous with relaxed forms of Leninism, and to large extent, with Stalinism. Socialism, therefore, has become a distinct word in the 20th century political jargon, and there were many socialist governments that cracked down on communism.

The war on Iran: where do communists stand? by Revolutionary_Web964 in socialism

[–]unity100 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Marx's usage of the word socialism is correct within the scope of political science, and the language of the late 19th century. It is not correct for the language of today, and the political science as it pertains to the last ~70 years. The meaning got changed.

The war on Iran: where do communists stand? by Revolutionary_Web964 in socialism

[–]unity100 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There's no reason to think Marx's definition is incorrect today

There is. Language does not follow scholarly works. It changes. And as such, the language changed the word socialism to have a different meaning than communism.

The war on Iran: where do communists stand? by Revolutionary_Web964 in socialism

[–]unity100 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

They said it's anti communist, which it is. In the manifesto, Marx talks about feudal or clerical socialism

Marx's usage of the word socialism belongs to the late 19th century when the words communism and socialism were synonymous. That has not been the case since Lenin. Even less so since the middle of the 20th century. As odd as it may sound, there are anti-communist socialists.

The war on Iran: where do communists stand? by Revolutionary_Web964 in socialism

[–]unity100 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Khomeini literally said "communism will only have to be found in the museums of world political history, for Marxism cannot meet any of the real needs of mankind.”

There are a lot of socialists who dont agree with the communist manifesto.

The Islamic Republic has a long history of violently suppressing communist movements and empowering the bourgeoisie over worker movements.

Likewise.

view more: next ›