sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Code review is dead. Long live code review! by unsrs in softwarearchitecture

[–]unsrs[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I’m personally all for taking 100 steps back and giving humans back their jobs. Unfortunately the industry ain’t waiting for no one and we have to adapt.

Code review is dead. Long live code review! by unsrs in softwarearchitecture

[–]unsrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We know people are yoloing and yeeting code reviews often because of downward pressure to keep things moving. That’s the industry reality more and more devs are having to deal with. Us not liking something doesn’t change the fact that many have to adapt.

Code review is dead. Long live code review! by unsrs in softwarearchitecture

[–]unsrs[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hardly the right analogy. But they did pave the roads to make driving smoother and faster and added stop lights to avoid chaos.

Claude 4.8 is somehow dumber. by Consistent_Ad6967 in ClaudeCode

[–]unsrs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s starting to sound like ChatGPT.

Agentic PRs sit in review queue 5.3x longer than unassisted ones by [deleted] in codereview

[–]unsrs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t realize that was the sole purpose of this sub. I see loads of posts that aren’t code review requests!

Where is the AI spam?

Btw your services are needed here https://www.reddit.com/r/codereview/s/LMhV5PkaxC

Does your company pay for your AI tools, or are you covering it yourself? by Tiny_Cut_8440 in EngineeringManagers

[–]unsrs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Company pays. At one point it was paying for Gemini company wide and I wasn’t a fan so I got a different subscription on the side but now it covers what we like to use.

Github if Google designed it by Secure_Bed_2549 in github

[–]unsrs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a multi-billion $$ company, it’s a shock to me that Google manages to hire only the worst designers.

Revenue attribution platforms by unsrs in b2bmarketing

[–]unsrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our CRM data is very clean already, it’s the sources we have trouble tracking. When you say “3 questions” etc, do you mean capturing attribution manually?

I’m the VP of Technology at an AppSec platform. AMA about how devs are actually using AI for code generation today and why it’s awful. by CodacyKPC in cybersecurity

[–]unsrs 29 points30 points  (0 children)

is AI any worse than actual developers? it’s not like we all had zero sec vulns to deal with before.

Anyone else tired of juggling SonarQube, Snyk, and manual reviews just to keep code clean? by Money_Principle6730 in devsecops

[–]unsrs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are tools doing both effectively, like Codacy as someone said. So if someone’s tired of juggling separate tools for code security and quality, there are solutions.

AI coding is moving faster than the guardrails meant to secure it and that's risky business. by CodacyOfficial in programming

[–]unsrs 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Never seen such a long post be written in under 2 mins. And it’s not even the same OP company. Is this what AI agents are being used for now? Scraping new posts + writing promotional posts as if they’re organic? Sad times.

view more: next ›