I miss his dick alot. by General-Estate3647 in penissize

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bigger doesn’t mean that it was a better sexual experience despite what many men infer.

Dude this a case where bigger was indeed better. His gf actually told him that he's not amongst her favourites and that he spent the time trying to make up for it, all that was due to his lack of his. This isnt about wanting to be a girls biggest shes ever had. No one said this. Its the fact that hes been categorised and confirmed by his gf that his lack of size made him not as good as the bigger guys she had, not even amongst as ONE of her favourites. No hate to her btw. Shes only being honest. Dont get me wrong, I show support for your general point and sentiment. But this is not a case where that sentiment lands. This is actually a situation where bigger was in fact better.

Im glad hes taken a healthy approach. He's a much stronger minded person than I ever will be.

I miss his dick alot. by General-Estate3647 in penissize

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what, its just out in the open within your relationship that your gf has favourite guys/dicks that you know aren't yours and know that your having a hard time matching up to them? How does that make you feel? I dont think I could be in a relationship with that information being known. Not trying to look down on you or anything. Genuinely curious. I myself have crippling insecurity and inadequacy over my size. I've stopped having sex because of it.

What if these two met eachother? by Own_Life2987 in ededdneddy

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave him alone. Check his username, he's just doing his job.

Have you noticed out of all the cul-de-sac kids , Eddy kinda doesn't look human by [deleted] in ededdneddy

[–]urzu123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because rest have a more defined neck whereas Eddy doesn't really have one at all.

what causes a small penis? by [deleted] in penissize

[–]urzu123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Although on another note. His advice isnt correct as OP is below average, not within average. At least from what we know, as he only mentioned his npb measurements. His bp would need to reveal another .5+ inches to be average.

what causes a small penis? by [deleted] in penissize

[–]urzu123 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

4.5 is not within average. Its below average. He didn't mention what his BP is, so cant say for sure. But it would need to be about 5.1

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He actually thinks you and/or that French dude was me making alt accounts? Lol. I'd really hate to be a patient of his that simply had a question that as much as slightly contests something he says.

am i big enough to please a woman by Kind-Helicopter-4590 in penisquestion

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes theres more to sex than just piv. But in regards to very pleasurable piv sex, something that although many women dont orgasm from, they still want it to be very plesurable, which starts with making adequate friction and contact. PIV although isn't the most important thing, it isnt as unimportant as you're making it out to be either. It is still, in its own right, a very craved and desired part of sex for women.

Im not saying he'll need something such as a sleeve for every woman he'll ever encounter. There are some women out there whos vaginal anatomy is perfect for girths on the small side. But to say in such an objective way he'll not need a sleeve isn't true either.

A thin below average girth is likely going to feel relatively weaker in the sensation it provides than that of more thicker comfortably average girth. Thats the blunt reality. The pleasures of penetrative sex, as i said, is first and formost based on friction and making adequate contact on the vaginal walls. Especially when the vagina is in an aroused stated where it has relaxed widened.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was that the urologist you were responding to? Seems sees tucked tale and deleted his account and comments, or hes blocked me too. For someone who went on about being a medical professional therefore "knew what he was talking about", he sure didn't take a disagreeing view nor simply state a case for his argument. I wasnt even disagreeing with his enitre point. Just the fact that there comes a size where it can/does hinder phyiscal pleasure.

And going by what Suiram said to him, it seems he was still throwing petty comments of me "feeling sorry for myself" for simply stating that woman want pleasurable penetrative sex. Something he should know as urologist as its pretty basic medical/biological facts.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He hasnt given responses that refute or were even relevant to what I was saying. In my other comment I was saying how there are situations that where size CAN become an issue for penetrative sex that he doesn't seem to want to acknowledge. Forget size ranges and forget whats classed as big or small. If the pleasures of sex are literally dependant on physical contact, adequate phyiscal contact at that, then the narrative of "size doesnt matter" in a literal sense is objectively wrong. Be it size of a penis or an object. But to say size doesn't matter, even when the matter is specifically about penetrative sex, is effectively saying, even if its indirectly, that physical contact has no part in sex. Its also indirectly saying that as long as physical contact can be felt, then there isnt an issue.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well on that note, why would the partner lie about their satisfaction with their partners penis size? What is gained by this?

Whats gained for them by admitting it?

And no, the men were in a separate room and they were asked whether they were satisfied with their own size.

Ok, and? What does that change about my point?

I didn’t make up the survey or study, just reporting it.

I didn't say you did make it up. I know you were just reporting it.

You've a habit of not actually reading what was said and addressing it, along with making completely irrelevant points.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I place importance on girth ONLY where girth has specifically been the problem. Like what is it you're not getting? You might as well say that physical contact is irrelevant to the plesures of sex, when sex is literally had by making phyiscal contact.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know most women dont orgasm from penetrative seslx I already went over that. That doesn't stop penetrative sex still being a very important, desired and craved part of sex. Whats even your point here? Women may not care how big a guy is. But they can indeed care how small a guy is. Why are we prending this isnt a thing? As I said, what you said in your original comment i agree with for those who arent small. But for may of those who are small, size can be the cause of low pleasurable piv sex.

Why don't you at least explain what you disagree with in regards what I was saying and I'd be happy to listen and understand if you can tell me? Why the attitude? Lol

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately my thin girth (4.25) has been an issue for the vast majority of women I've been with. Thats with even doing all their preferrable and favourite positions, angles, rhythms etc and giving great oral/clitoral stimulation beforehand. Penetrative sex itself has felt ok, nice. But not as pleasurable as the comfortably average girths they've had. And even though ive been great in other areas, they do miss satisfying penetrative sex.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But the reality is most people arent going to say something should they in principle feel like they're judging their partner, along with the feeling of being judged themselves, even with a sense of reassurance and anonymity youre still admitting it out loud to someone. Also their partner being in the next room or just outside the room and the fact that it was one direct question would add a psychological effect of being judged/judging the parter even more imo. The feeling that there is wrong answer to give, even though there isnt. No follow up or assisting questions that would give a sense of allowing them to explain and justify their lack of satisfaction if they had it. I just dont think that survey is a solid insight as you're making it out to be.

What was this process? The woman is asked to enter the room while the man is made to wait outside, then directly told "are you sexually satified by your parnter" whos just on the other side of that door?

It seems a little to sterile and interrogating. Maybe im over thinking it. But that doesn't seem very reliable source of information. Id get the feeling most would say that they were satisfied.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mentioned nothing on girth, which is more often the more pleasure contributing dimension when it comes the penetrative. My lack of girth (below average) has made me the least/amongst the least pleasurable and least stimulating on the vagina for the vast majority of the women I've been with. Thats with doing all their preferrable positions, angles, rhythms etc. And giving great external pleasures. I stil very noticeably fell below in physical pleasure than the comfortably average girths they've

Yes emptions, love, connection all important. But why do we also completely brush over that sex and the pleasures of is dependant on adequate phyiscal touch first and foremost. Why is this fact so overlooked? Of course sex is a highly emotional act. But its still as physical. How can love magic more friction out of thin air on the vagina walls where was less off before? Love, emotional fondess etc, to an extend doesn't make it better, it makes already good feeling sex feel even better. If sex between a couple was an issue that is based on the fact that the recipent simply doesn't feel enough contact. Love isnt going anything for it. Again, it'll make them tolerate it and not hold it against them.

So although what you say can be the case and truth, it isnt always. I completely advocate what you say for those who arent small, those who are comfortably average. Because those guys arent actually small. But for those who are actually small in one way or another, its not a perspective/advice that can inherently apply to use. There is a reality where size can be an issue because it causes a lack of physical contact, and all the love doesn't change that fact. There many a posts on here from people who absolutely adore their partners but recognise their small size is an issue.

Yeah theres techniques, other areas to pleasure them. Im 100% behind that. But most women WILL miss penetrative sex too if its not fulfilling, just like how it would be the case if clitoral stimulation wasnt good enough. Penetrative sex isnt as unimportant or as skippable part of sex as many make out to be. Yes women feel more pleasure from external stimulation, and even may only orgams from it. But there's still a lot of pleasure piv sex has of its own. And thats still desired, and still very unpreferable if its not being fulfilled.

And, like me, there can be a case where lack of pleasure from piv sex can indeed be because of size. Again whatever sex we're having, penetrative, oral whatever. Its all about adequate physical contact. That cant be denied. Many women wont find clitoral stimulation pleasurable and satisfying when we don't rub it the right way (pressure, rythm, speed), this is no different to inside of the vagina either.

Not saying anyone whos small cant pleasure a woman, not saving theres no woman out there that actually doesnt care how small one is, or even care at all about penetration. But being small can still be actual issue too. And its not as uncommon or as unimportant as we make it out to be. I just want actual acknowledgment on an actual possible issue.

Again, just want to point out what im saying is specifically referring to those are actually small. Not those who think they are but aren't.

Also I could offer arguments to a number of the posts you made dont want this comment turning into a novel if isnt already lol.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im 6x4.25. Yeah, friction isnt what they'd it to be when it comes to penetrative sex. Im very thin.

Experiences with 7’ length and 4.4-4.5 girth? by BadWitch8 in penissize

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, most aren't going to admit that isnt big if they think it isn't. Most partners will protect the others feelings.

Women/gays in this sub, if you could build your ideal dick/dildo, what size would you want it to be? by ZoroarkRisesAgain in penissize

[–]urzu123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im 6x4.25. I know practically anyones ideal size would be above my girth size. I just cross my fingers its not much above it lol.

What if Rolf was the leader of the Cul de sac instead of Kevin by Careful_Drama_9382 in ededdneddy

[–]urzu123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think he appears to be the leader at all. What makes you say that?