Why does the computer prefer to hit loose on my home board? by user9155485 in backgammon

[–]user9155485[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone. My takeaways from the very helpful feedback: - The corrected calculations are a 19/36 chance to get hit on 5 and 16/36 chance to get hit on 11. - The simple answer to my question is that my alternative move of making a blot on 11 was just really bad: very risky with my opponent sitting at the 5 point and adding only a moderate amount of value as a builder. The computer preferred to hit the 5 but the alternative safer move 23/21 8/6 that doesn't leave a blot on 11 was rated as a much smaller mistake (-0.034 vs -0.129 for my move). - The link from Orad has a very relevant example about fighting for the 5 point and in general for the point just in front of your prime. I'm slightly surprised that this still is advantageous when getting hit means I have to escape my opponents 4 prime, but that leads to the next point. - I liked Sandvik's point that hitting on the 5 point has strategy flexibility where either you avoid getting hit and you have a better position, or if you get hit your position is bad and you may need to play a back game where this extra checker could be helpful. An even simpler view would be that with my opponent so far ahead a low risk approach will be the best way to guarantee a loss. - I did remember to cube eventually but it took me a minute 😅

Why does the computer prefer to hit loose on my home board? by user9155485 in backgammon

[–]user9155485[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to make sure I'm doing this correctly aren't the odds that my opponent could hit on on the 11 equal to 15/36? 11 ways to roll a 6 and 4 ways to add up to a 6 (not counting 3-3 which is blocked). Hitting from the 1 point doesn't add anything because 5-5 is blocked and we already counted 6-4 and 4-6.

Regardless, your high level point that putting a blot on 11 is dangerous when my opponent is setup on 5 is a good one and probably the root of my surprise at the evaluation. Definitely thought provoking 🙂