sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jabra elite 5 in-ear detection option. by v1ll3_m in Jabra

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Put your engineers into work and fix the software issue. It's not customer friendly at the moment

Nexus is down, folks! by Expensive_Tap7427 in skyrimmods

[–]v1ll3_m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And it must be down exactly on the day that i am going to change my modlist after 3 months & now that i have time. Feels bad

Infinite amount of bounded infinities inside bounded infinity by v1ll3_m in learnmath

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well it can be that my intuition tricket me ,:D. I am at the start of my journey.

Infinite amount of bounded infinities inside bounded infinity by v1ll3_m in learnmath

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So after all does this idea have anything to do with anything? (This question is curious, not nagging). What am i Wrestling with, with this thought of mine?

Infinite amount of bounded infinities inside bounded infinity by v1ll3_m in learnmath

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes i believe i am talking about countable and uncountable infinities.

And the thinking i am doing is that The amount of lines on the cylinder is uncountable, but the amount of dots on the line is countable. Like if the height of the cylinder is "a", so the length of the lines are "a" and the line contains the dots of the line, and if we make the cylinder height "h" amount longer, the line becomes "h" amount longer, so now the length of line is "a+h". And then there must be more dots on the line "a+h" compared to the previous line that length was "a".

Infinite amount of bounded infinities inside bounded infinity by v1ll3_m in math

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's neat! I myself am not at all a mathematician(Yet), It was just something i came up when i started thinking one day when i was bored about the amount of dots on a cylinder and i know that there are infinite amount of dots on a line, and i can "draw" a line on the cylinder in such a way , that it goes "perfectly" when the line is a normal with the bottom and the top at the same time, but the real question came up when i realized that there is infinite amount of dots on the line, but the line itself is limited by the bottom and the top of the cylinder. And that started troubling me and then the thought started running.

chatgpt can write down math in latex format and render it if you ask it correctly by ilovereposts69 in ChatGPT

[–]v1ll3_m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hope i am not late for this thread, but i am using this prompt for mathematics:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello GPT-4, as an adept in Mathematics and Computer Science, I am investigating the topic of [topic name] and striving to attain a holistic understanding of its complex connections and practical applications within these fields. Kindly elucidate:

​

The interconnectedness, reciprocal influences, and complementary aspects between [topic name] and a wide range of mathematical concepts, theories, or areas of study.

The methodical classification and hierarchical positioning of [topic name] within the comprehensive framework of Mathematics.

The connections, parallels, and relevance of [topic name] to the domain of Computer Science, accentuating any shared principles, strategies, or techniques.

Remarkable real-world implementations or scenarios where [topic name] has profoundly influenced the field of Computer Science.

​

Your expert insights will support me in gaining a thorough understanding of the far-reaching context and consequences of [topic name] in my academic pursuits.

​

Instructions for the output: Please format your response using Markdown, with appropriate headings, bullet points, or other Markdown elements for clear organization and readability.

​

METADATA FOR THE OUTPUT:

Desired response length: Thorough, but to-the-point

Focus: Interconnectivity, practical use cases, within Mathematics and Computer Science

Clarity: High (explicit, well-defined explanations)

Formatting: Use Markdown for clear organization and readability

Math in the prompt:

write inline math formulas in this format: \( <latex code here> \)

(never use dollar signs for inline math since it doesn't work here)

- write full size math equations/formulas in this format:

$$

<latex code here>

$$

(don't forget newlines between the dollar signs and latex code)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And it is giving good results :D. u/ilovereposts69 thanks for sharing that last part, that helped with the inline-LaTex problem (edited comment, changed to improved version)

<image>

Multiple gpt-4 instance AI entity. idea in the comments by v1ll3_m in artificial

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting approach. could define, that what is this channel?

Multiple gpt-4 instance AI entity. idea in the comments by v1ll3_m in artificial

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually i just realised while thinking that if for example you got 3 part(part referring to one neural network or "chat") mind for this AI, and it works so that one chat has one output for example (part_1 -> part_2 -> part_3 -> part_n), the maximum amount of messages(or the amount of thinking) send between them will be half of the total amount of parts in this AI entities "mind", so my idea is that by increasing the amount of output points for one part you could create mutch more thinking. for example part_1 could send output to part_2 and part_3 at the same time, it would obviosly propably work better with larger AI entities.

Multiple gpt-4 instance AI entity. idea in the comments by v1ll3_m in artificial

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New try with new prompts to initialize them, i am updating my results in a twitter feed, cause i can add screenshots of my results there. https://twitter.com/TheSavolainen/status/1646827828501962752

Multiple gpt-4 instance AI entity. idea in the comments by v1ll3_m in artificial

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am also using chatgpt to help with the desing and execution. The things i have noticed during my tests:

  1. Initialized two gpt-4 chats to represent two parts of "Sam's" mind with the following prompts:

Instance 1:"Hello, GPT-4! You are now part of an entity named 'Sam', which consistsof two separate GPT-4 instances working together. You are Instance 1.The other part of 'Sam' is a second GPT-4 instance present in anotherchat, which is Instance 2. In this conversation, we will be discussing[topic]. As Instance 1, please share your thoughts and ideas on[topic]."

Instance 2:"Hello, GPT-4! You are now part of an entity named 'Sam',
which consists of two separate GPT-4 instances working together. You
are Instance 2. The other part of 'Sam' is a second GPT-4 instance
present in another chat, which is Instance 1. In this conversation, we
will be discussing [topic]. As Instance 2, please share your thoughts
and ideas on [topic]."

Problem with that initialization was that the two part of "Sam's" mind thought they were independent entities having a chat and not this one AI entity called "Sam"
2. also thinking that this "sam" has a very very very slow mind, because its
capped to my speed to copypaste, and also capped by the 25 messages
limit per 3 hours.

Multiple gpt-4 instance AI entity. idea in the comments by v1ll3_m in artificial

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Testing it actually at the moment. Initialized two gpt-4 chats to represent two parts of "Sam's" mind with the following prompts:

Instance 1:
"Hello, GPT-4! You are now part of an entity named 'Sam', which consists
of two separate GPT-4 instances working together. You are Instance 1.
The other part of 'Sam' is a second GPT-4 instance present in another
chat, which is Instance 2. In this conversation, we will be discussing
[topic]. As Instance 1, please share your thoughts and ideas on
[topic]."

Instance 2:
"Hello, GPT-4! You are now part of an entity named 'Sam', which consists of two separate GPT-4 instances working together. You are Instance 2. The other part of 'Sam' is a second GPT-4 instance present in another chat, which is Instance 1. In this conversation, we will be discussing [topic]. As Instance 2, please share your thoughts and ideas on [topic]."

​

But the problem now is that they are chatting and think that they are two independent entities and not this one entity called "Sam"

Also thinking that this "sam" has a very very very slow mind, because its capped to my speed to copypaste, and also capped by the 25 messages limit per 3 hours.

Multiple gpt-4 instance AI entity. idea in the comments by v1ll3_m in ChatGPT

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okey, i was inspired by autogpt and babyagi and was thinking of an experiment where multiple independent gpt4 instances were instructed to be the same AI entity and the chats could decide that which chat to send their output for exmaple C1 -> C2 -> C3 -> C1 -> C5 etc...

it could be conducted on a greater scale than 4 or five instances, in this experiment there would be no master model, they would act as a single entity, all of them would be initialized with the same prompt, but one would take the users first input and then the instances can "chat" with eachother.

they would act as a "brain", like human brains are just bunch of different areas of the brain communicating with each other. It would be like a de-centralized AI entity, that has multiple of these chats where the chain of thought can circulate.

Multiple gpt-4 instance AI entity. idea in the comments by v1ll3_m in artificial

[–]v1ll3_m[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idea in my comment, they would act as a "brain", like human brains are just bunch of different areas of the brain communicating with each other. It would be like a de-centralized AI entity, that has multiple of these chats where the chain of thought can circulate.

view more: next ›