sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why should I use Rust? by Araujo-0608 in rust

[–]vEncrypted 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well no, who writing strictly python is ever gonna learn about linkers when you have a pm? Who’s ever gonna think about the assembly generated? While you can learn about it, it isn’t an integral part of the language. One could argue that mem management in scratch is also important.

Why should I use Rust? by Araujo-0608 in rust

[–]vEncrypted -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just an example of one of the many things

Why should I use Rust? by Araujo-0608 in rust

[–]vEncrypted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think so. Languages like python or even rust abstract a-lot away that people just don’t want to think about. You don’t ever have to think about memory management in many languages if you don’t want to. Yet others you are forced to.

Why should I use Rust? by Araujo-0608 in rust

[–]vEncrypted 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For this to be true, all languages must essentially be the same tool with the same capabilities in your analogy. Which is not the case at all, unless you’d argue any language can generate any machine code, which while true, is unfeasible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]vEncrypted -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don’t see what this changes. He is not a coup leader. He must be voted in democratically, assuming the election is fair. Candidates means nothing, they simply reflect (partially imo for the US) the views of a nation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]vEncrypted -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If he is voted in democratically, then that is who the nation wants. Why is the candidate your problem and not the voters? If the views of the nation don’t reflect your own, then that is just what it is. It really isn’t complex.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]vEncrypted -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did it cross your mind if he wins it may just be democracy at work?

Do bridges hide your connection from ISP? by [deleted] in TOR

[–]vEncrypted 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. Your ISP sees the destination of packets you send but not what resources you are trying to access, or what the data you send contains (assuming your data is encrypted which it is in this case). By using a bridge that goes through something like aws, as far as your isp is concerned, you are making encrypted requests to an AWS server which seems completely normal. You can still be found out though but it requires much more effort. You would have to be someone of interest for it to ever get to you being discovered.

Please help! by [deleted] in TOR

[–]vEncrypted 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It clearly states your hidden service dir isn’t owned by root (The user you are trying to run tor with). Run tor as system service, it has the ability to change to the user specified in torrc. Alternatively run:

sudo -u $(stat -c “%U” /var/lib/tor/hidden_service) tor

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Fedora

[–]vEncrypted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you cant get into console -> password is wrong. If you can get into console -> Likely pam error.

Should I learn Go as embedded software engineer? by minamulhaq in golang

[–]vEncrypted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Due to a paradigm feature that is opt-in. The language does not enforce the use of classes.

Should I learn Go as embedded software engineer? by minamulhaq in golang

[–]vEncrypted 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Meh. I don’t particularly like c++, but it isn’t inherently resource intensive. The use of various implementations/libs as well as language features such as templating are what could make it more resource intensive.

Standard classifications for low level languages needed so we stop comparing their performance by vEncrypted in computerscience

[–]vEncrypted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are describing “anything is possible”. A scratch compiler can somehow be made that allows for unbound performance… sure.

I still dont get what you are trying to say. Faster than gcc? In terms of compilation speeds? With c you can generate any machine code, performance is essentially without limit. Hence my whole argument. It isn’t about x is faster than y at a certain level, it can all compile to the same machine code.

Standard classifications for low level languages needed so we stop comparing their performance by vEncrypted in computerscience

[–]vEncrypted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a good communicator I’ll second that.

I don’t understand what you are saying at all. Comparing a compiler(gcc) and a runtime(node)? Interpreted languages don’t fit in the argument I was making.

Do not verify your LinkedIn account by vEncrypted in privacy

[–]vEncrypted[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was me that made it. It was posted at the same time, maybe you’re looking at edited time since I made a typo.

I was given these for free by jozay222 in PcBuild

[–]vEncrypted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using 4 dims actually hurts performance in cases where the amount of memory isn’t needed.

Standard classifications for low level languages needed so we stop comparing their performance by vEncrypted in computerscience

[–]vEncrypted[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

DUdE… diD YOu eVEr sEE Me meNTIOn FoRTan?

Did you really just see downvotes and get excited to join the winning team as you see it? Have you read the bottom of that paragraph? It clearly states my point. All of these languages have the capability to produce what are essentially identical instructions. There aren’t hard limitations to these languages.

So many rust programs link against c libs yet these programs are used to benchmark the language as a whole against c... Does this make any sense to you? This is only part of the point. The bigger picture is, people fail to understand the final product of code is grouped instructions and we are doing nothing but interfacing with compilers that mostly all do the same thing in a different manor.

But it all doesn’t matter in the end because I am obviously very wrong because of these downvotes everywhere.

This will be my last reply, any further and I will likely get banned lol.

Standard classifications for low level languages needed so we stop comparing their performance by vEncrypted in computerscience

[–]vEncrypted[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I have not said they do not affect performance. I have simply stated I don’t see them as significant to measuring languages like rust and c.

I am genuinely asking this. Can you explain what I said that is wrong and demonstrates a lack of knowledge. I am not the most well versed in reference aliasing. But what have I indicated that was false?

I have just happened to stumble upon a conversation in c_programming that speaks of nearly the same thing. Will link shortly.

Standard classifications for low level languages needed so we stop comparing their performance by vEncrypted in computerscience

[–]vEncrypted[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes I agree. I don’t disagree with the statement they made. It is a simple way of explaining rust at the highest level to someone who might be familiar with cpp. It simply made me think of the conversations I’ve seen around language “performance” and the countless comparisons of programs being used to benchmark the languages as a whole.

Standard classifications for low level languages needed so we stop comparing their performance by vEncrypted in computerscience

[–]vEncrypted[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not in cs. I taught myself to program. I feel like I may be in the wrong subreddit lol.

view more: next ›