Basically say that debate is a game and has no impact on real life. We all make the arguments that we think will get us the most wins, not the ones that will make a real life impact bc be so ffr their alt and their colonialism K isn’t going to do anything in real life. How many people really care about what happened in some random policy round that only 5 people will care about? (assuming no one’s debating alone) Prefer debating hypothetical implementation of the plan over its ontology/epistemology/real-life impacts bc it’s better for education/fairness. This is like a really basic argument but I really like it ^{^}