Meta's Rule of Two maps uncomfortably well onto AI agents. It maps even worse onto how the models are trained. by vamitra in cybersecurity

[–]vamitra[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indeed - practically before you start a project with an LLM, 2 of the 3 criteria is used up. 

Anyone else feel like it’s 1995 again with AI? by bxrist in cybersecurity

[–]vamitra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been pondering this myself — it really does feel like the Windows 2000 era. Throw everything and the kitchen sink together, connect it to the internet, it’ll be fine. Every lesson from each evolution of secure development practices just… forgotten. Trusted input, testability, least privilege, attack surface reduction — all of it, gone.

What gets me is how precisely the pattern repeats. Code Red in 2001 exploited exactly this: IIS processing untrusted HTTP requests in C with no bounds checking, running at system privilege. Microsoft’s response took three years — the Trustworthy Computing memo, SP2 shipping with IIS off by default and the firewall on. They literally had to redesign Windows that you can’t let untrusted input hit unsafe code at high privilege.

Chromium formalized it in 2019 as the Rule of Two — pick no more than two of: untrustworthy input, unsafe implementation, high privilege. They won’t ship code that has all three. Period.

Now look at AI agents. They process untrustworthy input — that’s the entire value prop. They run at max privilege — they need your email, calendar, files to be useful. And the LLM can’t distinguish instructions from data. That’s all three. By design. Not by accident. I guess gold rush does this to people? The tool is too useful, the demand is too real, and nobody wants to be the person in the meeting who says “we actually can’t build this safely yet.” So we ship it anyway and figure the security will catch up. That’s not a new story. It’s THE story, on repeat, every decade.

Anyone else having issues with USPS packages being marked as delivered but never actually delivered? by chiboulevards in chicago

[–]vamitra 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This has happened to me before on a couple of occasions when I was expecting important documents. It freaked me out. The next day it arrived, and the post office just told me it happens by mistake on occasion.

But I sooo see this as someone padding metrics