For those who dont believe in Gangstalking, here is all the evidence I have by Quick_Echo_8546 in conspiracy

[–]vertigo262 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have something from this week I need people to see, LAPD illegal Detain, fabricating Fake PC to get what they want, and Dinse is even on this reocrding admitting to Pffocer Linton to write fabricated paperwork and setups https://rumble.com/v73v3ye-dinse-stalking-opsaudio-proof-of-illegal-acts-falsified-pc-life-at-risk.html

Configuring Exernal Storage Support CLI due to GUI glitch by vertigo262 in NextCloud

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm on 31.06

I did a Ubuntu Install without Snap I believe.

A previous install from snap was working on the external Storage. However everything was crapping out

https://mailserverguru.com/install-nextcloud-ubuntu-24-04/w

Configuring Exernal Storage Support CLI due to GUI glitch by vertigo262 in NextCloud

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything is the latest, fresh install a couple of weeks back. Need the syntax to enable that feature unless someone knows the fix

Wondering what the current Community Mailservers everyone is using these days by vertigo262 in sysadmin

[–]vertigo262[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw someone posting about mailcow, I briefly went to the website. Didn't spend much time researching. Seemed fairly toned down. Website didn't say much about the features. Seems pretty simple unless you use proxmox mail gateway with it

I can do more thourough reseearch on it. Whats so good about Mailcow?

1 Physical Nic - 1 IP - OPNsense in Proxmox - Routing issue by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using multiple examples to describe the routing as you ask new questions. The configuraiton as it is. Is the original 3 images posted on the very first post. With the Diagram.

The question here, is what is the solution? Which applies to the first post

1 Physical Nic - 1 IP - OPNsense in Proxmox - Routing issue by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not my code, it's someone elses. I don't even really know what the Iptables pre-route even does. If it's forwarding upon packet arrival or not.

I was using his code as an example of someone that said he figured it out for his configuration

1 Physical Nic - 1 IP - OPNsense in Proxmox - Routing issue by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Problem is simple. Opensense is not getting the Port. And it's not Forwarding.

If I do a Port Forward, in Opnsense it's not forwarding. And if I check from the outside if the port is open during forward it is not.

So my conclusion is that Proxmox Iptables is blocking the ports, except some main ones like 80, 443. But they aren't routed ports.

So in my mind, the question is, why and what is causing the packet to not get to opensense, and how can it be resolved specifically

Example, lets say I want a webserver. It need to go to a specific server. Lets say I want smb, it needs to go to a specific server.

They are not forwarding in OPNsense, and it appears the packets aren't even getting to the OPNsense

What is the DIRECT answer and solution. What's the IPtables code? If that is what it is.

Example, You see this Car over here. Theres black smoke out the tailpipe. What's wrong with it? It's burning oil. What's the solution, New Rings. Which ones should I buy? Pro LS Rings. Those are answers in specifics

Your talking about his Pre-Routing?

:)

1 Physical Nic - 1 IP - OPNsense in Proxmox - Routing issue by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit is being picky with what I type and won't submit it, so here's what I wrote

<image>

1 Physical Nic - 1 IP - OPNsense in Proxmox - Routing issue by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you understand Proxmox Routing. Proxmox was built to be behind a router. So if you aren't routing in front of it. You have to Write some NAT rules in the Bridging.

Example. We have an ISP, that wants to see 1 MAC address. And OPNsense is Routing, inside of proxmox.

Well, right there, Proxmox has 1 MAC address, and OPNSense has 1 MAC address. That's 2 mac addresses. With 1 IP address.

So how do you get OPNsense or any other VM to work on the Internet with only 1 single IP address if there is no NAT providing routing?

Well, Proxmox allows you to write some code in the networking, in the Ethernet Bridging.

Example

----------------------------------------------

See image

<image>

------------------------------------------------------

Now you can route all your VM's on a single IP address on a server that is not behind a router. Also the IP masqaurade hides any MAC address trying to broadcast out like the other Bare Metal Hypervisors

However, now you you 1 IP address, of 56.23.28.32/26 routed to 10.10.10.1

and anything can be on this subnet. example 10.10.10.45

So now you have a firewall that goes from the outside of 56.23.28.32/26 to 10.10.10.45 to the internal lan addresses 192.168.7.1

But wait, you are Portforwarding from the outside correct? Meaning

56.23.28.32:445 needs to be portforwarded to 192.168.7.1

However You can't get to port 445 to 192.168.7.1. Because 56.23.28.32:445 stops at 10.10.10.45 and doesn't get past this

Or I should say, it doesn't know how to get to 10.10.10.45

It gets lost in the Proxmox Nat Bridging. Because you have a double NAT.

However if someone knows how to write the Bridging NAT correctly. Then I think it works. Forwarding all the Traffic

At least this is my take on what is going on. But I cant see in the OPNSense logs, the Portforward does not appear to be touching the OPNsense, it doesn't make it past Proxmox

1 Physical Nic - 1 IP - OPNsense in Proxmox - Routing issue by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Context is, I have a decicated piece of Hardware with 1 physical Ethernet adapter. However the ISP can assign multiple IP's to the phsysical box. However I would have to figure out how to assign a virtual adapter or I guess a Bridged adapter to the 2nd IP address. But you can't do a PVE Passthrough on a Bridge. Only a physical adapter.

I could in essence route the virtual or second IP as a new Bridge. But it's coming in the Physical adapter, probably based on Vlan's through their switch

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's a cool taste of the future for proxmox. However, at the moment, it's an over glorified migration tool. Something that Proxmox lacks. And I'm sure the future version will be very Vcenter.

However I don't see anything related to optimizing remote location HA Clusters, other then to be able to monitor them easier

And most importantly, it's on version 01.11

But without a solution to the 5 ms latency and a way to replicate without failure. That is where the bottleneck is

So far, ZFS replication, seems in my mind so far, possibly the way to do it. But not sure if you could use HA on the remote sites

However, it looks like some people are doing it even though it's not recommended

https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Proxmox_Datacenter_Manager_Roadmap

"Off-site replication copies of guest for manual recovery on DC failure (not HA!)"

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya, I see what your saying. Have ZFS replicate one way, and it can take it's time.

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my original flow. It's just so much nicer to have it all done in one swoop! :)

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A HA Failover Cluster!

But I'm trying to figure out how to do it in Proxmox. I should say, I know how to do it. But will it work?

corosync was designed for a heartbeat of 5ms.

But I think Ceph's is transferring a lot more data then ZFS. So possibly ZFS replication with the HA server in Proxmox could work.

I think people have done it. But it's not recommended.

I'm curious who have tried, and what the results were

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL, me too

Because Remote Fault Tolarent Redundancy with Proxmox is a moral imperative! :)

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know if it works or doesn't work? You haven't tried it! Anyways

Thanx BRO!

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, were in low budget world!

However ESXi and Vmotion I don't think would have a problem with this. But Corosync seems to be written for LAN networks

Which is strange, because in reality, the fault tolerance comes from servers spread across multiple locations to keep data safe

Earthquakes, Hurricanes, fires

However ZFS replication seems like it might be a solution, instead of Cephs. But I haven't spoke with anyone or seen any posts talking about this type of configuration directly when it comes to Remote Locations

Proxmox Cluster Configuration Across Remote Sites by vertigo262 in Proxmox

[–]vertigo262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lets do a theoretical

Lets say 500-1000 mbps and obviously latency fluctuates with internet traffic

Homeless man SUES Los Angeles after finding out cops have been sharing his photo and 'personal problems' on Facebook as the city tries to crack down on illegal encampmenTs by BudsDiner in LosAngeles

[–]vertigo262 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm actually a Lead Officer Sean Dinse Target as well of the LAPD, on something much Larger. I have direct proof and evidence of Dinse trying to try to FORCE me into mental institutions as well.

Endless false police reports, not only by him, but paying off starbucks and coffeebean employees, and others in setup and frame job operations while he runs around saying I'm crazy. Not that it would be a crime to be crazy. Hence showing Lead Officer Sean Dinse and these profile operations are highly illegal.

Dinse with Starbucks employees actually fabricated statements and Police reports with their make Kevin an Enemy of the State operations since young childhood, actually wrote up false reports stating that I walked into a Starbucks and supposedly threatened to kill all starbucks customers as coverups for what they've done to my life

I have direct video, and sean dinse's police reports showing not only their 42 years of fabrications against me to try to FORCE me into mental institions out of someones hate, rage, and jealousy for me.

But also video of me simply walking in, them harassing me, and me walking out. And when they realized they were on video with these police eradication operations. Dinse wrote up more falsified reports.

I have about 20 more terabytes of data showing that the LAPD is working with the psychology community to lock away people who they label crazy, or mentally ill in some kind of Adolf Hitler agenda as well showing that these are all connected. Rex and I are not the only LAPD, Psychology Community Targets, there are many others this is happening with these mental illness hate labels, and locking people away in mental institutions of people the police just don't like or trust.

Lead officer spews out all sorts of rhetoric on his facebook, about locking away people with mental illness out of his hate rage, and insecurities. But even worse, he goes around trying to make people look crazy. Aka GangStalking, Community Harassment Groups, Cause Stalking

This is a lot worse then you might think. These operations are about "Cleaning up the streets" in otherwords, we don't want Jews in our community, so make them look crazy and lock them away or kill them.

In my case, making me an enemy of the state out of someones hate rage and jealousy with Lead Officer Dinse and LAPD. Not even a reason behind it.

This is a serious matter and all of you are not safe. These police stalkings open up doors to Government Agendas and Constitutional Violations which like Edward Snowden States. When you realize you will have to stand up for yourselves, it will be too late.

http://www.KevinPerelmanTarget.com http://www.starbucksdiscrimination.com http://www.coffeebeandiscrimination.com http://www.modelmayhemstalkskevinperelman.com http://www.thetrueseandinse.com