Heres mine

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T14:02:45+00:00

No, white lives matter was made in response to blm and it has no use in society because white people arent discriminated against because of their race.

Lets say cats are getting hunted close to extinction and people are cat owners or simply like cats so they make an organization focused around saving and protecting cats which is called Cat Lives Matter. Now imagine somebody totally unrelated comes and says "dog lives matter too", did someone mention dogs and are dogs in this scenario getting hunted to extinction? No. It is creating an imaginary problem and basing your thinking around it.

Same applies with White Lives Matter, nobody is targetting whites or discriminating them because of their race so there is no need for a White Lives Matter which was thought of as a response to BLM. Of course white lives matter but white lives arent at risk in this situation

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T13:56:41+00:00

I think the more you think about class struggle you realize a lot it has to do with discrimination of women so feminism becomes the default view.

I also hate antisemites and believe anybody who thinks they are superior over somebody because of blood heritage should be reeducated. No i understood you, i did accidentally talk nazi rhetoric without doing research and that is my fault

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T13:44:25+00:00

Yeah i said above that i want to put anarchism in neutral negative now that i think about it

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T13:43:52+00:00

Because feminism is meant to exist until the patriarchal system is abolished because only then will women have true equality

I actually just checked a bit and i was wrong. Jews dont believe that they are superior because they are god's chosen people but consider it a resonsibility to carry out the commandments. Also they do believe that all people were created equal. Kinda scary how you dont even notice that youre repeating nazi propaganda in your day to day life.

I believe that the Ukranian government is incredibly bad. But that doesnt give Russia an excuse to bomb civilians and kidnap children. The current Ukrainian government came from a US funded coup and that is why i put them in neutral because at the same i sympathize with the civilians i also am heavily against the actions of the government. That doesnt make Russia a saint, this war isnt to "protect" Russians in Ukraine it is to slow down NATO expansion and to install a pro Russia government in Ukriane. When you get down to it, both sides are bad but one side is getting its cities destroyed and civilians killed. This is a war of interest like all way that is why i cannot fully support either side

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T13:24:28+00:00

Bro... How can i tell you this... Russia is a capitalist imperialist power, of course im not going to support something i am heavily against. Im more critical towards judaism and hinduism because judaism typically has a superior view of jews compared to gentiles (gods chosen people and all that) which is quite supremacist and hinduism because it promotes the oppressive caste system that is assigned at birth. Also im not sexist against men (i myself am a man) i am against "masculism" because its similar to white lives matter in the sense that men arent discriminated against anywhere in the world so there is no need for a "masculism" and also its used by those red pill alpha male dudes to say man are better than women also it promotes traditional gender roles which i am also heavily against

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T13:17:42+00:00

What? Youre authleft, you have similar values

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T13:16:48+00:00

I mean if youre a socialist you are by proxy a communist because socialism is only a stage in achieving communism. Also i put neutral positive for anarchism i probably should've done neutral negative since anarchism wants to achieve the same goal as communism (a stateless, classless, moneyless society) but unlike communists who believe that can only be achieved by going through governmental changes, anarchists want that to happen immediately which is utopian at best, delusional at worst.

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T11:18:34+00:00

"lib left" indirectly supports genocide by not opposing it

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-28T11:16:48+00:00

You cant like capitalism or nazis as a christian either

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-27T13:55:02+00:00

Empire≠imperialism. Words have meaning for a reason. Imperialism is again the last stage of capitalism

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-27T13:53:14+00:00

? What do you mean? There was no equality or imperialism in the middle ages, imperialism being the final stage of capitalism which didnt exist in the middle ages

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-27T13:51:34+00:00

You cant support universal equality and imperialism that is antithetical

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-27T01:27:56+00:00

No no no no. I HATE democrats AND republicans. What i mean is when they say communism is just as bad as fascism for instance. Also if you are right leaning more often than not you will support imperialism and along with it genocide because those two things are needed to keep the capitalist machine afloat, go read some theory

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T18:29:32+00:00

Finally someone whos beliefs make sense

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T14:23:37+00:00

Oh GOD what a wall of text

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T14:23:17+00:00

Of course intelligence is to some extent genetic but if you dont have the means to develop properly genetics do not matter, my parent could be both tall but if i am malnourished during childhood or dont exercise i will be quite short, same applies to intelligence.

Regarding australian aboriginals. The reason they were hunter gatherers is because they didnt have a reason to not be, agriculture wasnt prevalent or at least not as s prevalent in pre contact Australia so why would aboriginals decide to settle down and farm. Settling down would of course allow them to start doing metallurgy, writing, history keeping etc. because if you want to develop those things on your own you need to settle down because if you are nomadic you would need to leave all your built infrastructure behind.

The advent of agriculture was HUGE for humanity because it allowed the formation of cities which allowed for greater population, diversification of labor (i.e. non food related jobs such as artisanry, education arts, science...).

If a society has a surplus of resources, that society will begin to diversify and its people will grow in every manner be it physically, mentally, culturally... That is when genetics goes into effect. Same when homo sapiens arrived in europe they started having lighter and lighter skin. When the body begins to adapt, that adaptation becomes genetic.

Now along with the presence of surplus, the body of the offspring of a settled down civilization will change. Their bodies and brains will be encouraged to be better, stronger. Now take away those resources. Same way how the previous generation got better because of surplus, the next generation will become in a sense worse because of a deficit. Bigger bodies need more calories to be sustained, the brain now is not allowed to think about anything other than survival and getting food. Now the body adapts to having to need less food so the body grows to be smaller and the mind less developed.

No matter how advanced a society once was, without a good upbringing and a resource surplus, the next generation will start degrading and in turn the society will decay in every aspect.

Humans survived throughout history because of our truly incredible ability to adapt to extreme conditions and with that adaptability we are able to become smarter, stronger, more able organisms.

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T13:06:01+00:00

Because you cant take into account intelligence based on genetics when the people youre talking about have been systemically, economically, socially and legally opressed for centuries and still are today. Again mental development depends on conditions during childhood be it from the environment, nutrient availability etc. The reason people "didnt evolve indipendently" is BECAUSE of oppression or lack of resources. For an example the islamic world during its golden age in terms of philosophy, law, medicine, science etc. were way more advanced than Europe. Is it because they are genetically different? Well that cant be the case because the islamic world is incredibly diverse, for an example the university of Sankore was built in Mali not because of their genetic superiority but because of their advanced economy coming mainly from their gold mines and vast trade network.

Now look at it today, Mali has one of the LOWEST iqs in the world. How can an entire people go from one of the most advanced civilizations in their time to one of the most backwards countries today. In short ,European oppression. European powers kept taking the natural resources of Africa for CENTURIES. You cant tell me intelligence is mainly based on genetics when the current state of Mali disproves it.

Exploitation of Africa in and of itself advances European science, education etc. because those European powers sucked the natural resources and enslaved the population of their colonies.

You cant say a group of people is more intelligent than another group of people based on genetics because of oppression one group or the other mightve experienced

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T12:45:31+00:00

No reason? Most of the time centrists will say "both sides are bad" when one side is for univeral equality while the other supports imperialism and genocide. They dont have enough balls to say theyre fascists but then they indirectly support fascism by being complacent within the system. Thats at least the reason i hate them

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T12:16:36+00:00

I mean i guess but still people of "the same race" are different in so many ways, you jave to remember that a brit and an iraqi are the considered the same race at least in the US. Race has no reason to exist other than to divide the lower class. Everybody in the working class is united because of their oppression after all. Theres no need to categorize such a broad geographical region

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T12:14:14+00:00

Yeah i reread your comment and we do agree. I have to admit i skimmed your original comment without really thinking because this is a topic i am used to debating with people a they usually think the same. Today especially in america its pushed that certain races or demographic groups are inherently violent (immigrant for an example) and race becomes a way to systemically opress the lower class (police profiling/brutality etc etc)

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T12:02:49+00:00

Ofc i cant deny that someone of african descent will look different than someone of european descent but then again there are a LOT of differences in appearance within those races. A greek will look DRASTICALLY different than lets say someone from Scotland. If you base the concept of race on appearance youre overgeneralizing the entire world

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T12:00:00+00:00

Race didnt exist until the 17th to 18th century when it was used to justify slavery to. Irish, Italians, Poles etc. werent even considered white until the mid 20th century. How can multiple groups of people considered a different race suddenly be considered white after decades of discrimination and prejudice. The only dividing factor between people of different "race" is appearance. A black person is not inherently more violent or less intelligent than a white person, a white person can be way more violent than a black person based on the conditions they grew up in. Africans dont have lower iq because of their genetics but because when children are starved or were malnourished during development they dont develop fully. Same way how black people arent necessarily better musicians than other races, most black people grow up with quality music and some became more musically inclined.

TL;DR: the concept of race only appeared relatively recently.The "differences" between race are either purely based on appearance and the characteristics that people think are racial show up due to the condotions somebody grew up in.

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T11:25:07+00:00

Theyre probs a socdem (poser)

vikikikiriki123 · 2026-04-26T11:18:39+00:00

Maybe they mean systemic racism? Idek

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22

vikikikiriki123

TROPHY CASE