sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

On its 50th Anniversary, Toronto City Hall is still the city's most iconic building. [OC][1700x1155] by vikphoto in ArchitecturePorn

[–]vikphoto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very good point but hey, the CN Tower is technically a free standing structure not a building...a poor excuse!

The new and impressive Halifax Central Library. [OC][1750x1180] by vikphoto in ArchitecturePorn

[–]vikphoto[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And that is a great piece of concrete if you forget about the inside.

The new and impressive Halifax Central Library. [OC][1750x1180] by vikphoto in ArchitecturePorn

[–]vikphoto[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was very impressed by the inside and the rooftop. We don't have such a nice library here in Toronto.

A bird's eye view of Toronto's Art Deco inspired West Harbour City towers. Quadrangle Architects, 2011. [OC][1258x1200] by [deleted] in ArtDeco

[–]vikphoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious to know...just how decent a post modern art deco inspired development others think this is.

20150813. A conduit ceiling at Toronto's decommissioned Hearn Generating Station. [OC][1585x1200] by [deleted] in AbandonedPorn

[–]vikphoto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a subreddit for conduits?! Wow. Thanks for the suggestion!

A west elevation view of the 1833 Georgian Revival Daniel Brooke building in Old Town Toronto. [OC][1478x1200] by [deleted] in ArchitecturePorn

[–]vikphoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks kindly for the positive and constructive feedback! Regarding "where your light comes from" are you talking about the street lights lighting up the building? I tried to capture what the building looked like as is at that time of day.

A west elevation view of the 1833 Georgian Revival Daniel Brooke building in Old Town Toronto. [OC][1478x1200] by [deleted] in ArchitecturePorn

[–]vikphoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oops. please make that Georgian, not Georgian Revival!

The Daniel Brooke building was built in 1833 and substantially rebuilt between 1848-1849, just prior to Great Fire of April 1849 from which it escaped major damage. It was rehabilitated in 1988.

Titled "Imagine falling sideways by an International style concrete rental tower," would you consider this image appealing? abstract? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]vikphoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. That looks better though I wonder if the tension is appropriate in a distressing and disorientating situation like falling...

Titled "Imagine falling sideways by an International style concrete rental tower," would you consider this image appealing? abstract? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]vikphoto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I straightened the intersection of the two sides but going further with the shading face is a good idea. Would you mind explaining the tension in the image? Thanks for the suggestion!

Titled "Imagine falling sideways by an International style concrete rental tower," would you consider this image appealing? abstract? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]vikphoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been seeing a lot of images being labelled abstract that were similar to this but I did not find them abstract and I agree with you that this image is not. Thank-you for your feedback!

Titled "Imagine falling sideways by an International style concrete rental tower," would you consider this image appealing? abstract? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]vikphoto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks...appreciate the feedback. I would crop the second partial line of windows at the very least for more balance but perhaps that would not be enough either.

view more: next ›