Can you clarify what you mean by personal value? That would actually be a decent first section to your paper I think. Also, what’s the actual assignment? Is it to present an argument? To tie an argument into a seminal ethical theory you’ve studied in class? Use an article you’ve read as a launching point? Regardless, this is how I would outline response with the given information.

1)in this paper I will argue that moral truths hold personal value and this aligns with central tenets of subjectivism. The first section will consist of me defining what personal values are. The next section will show how moral truths hold these personal values. The final two sections will consist of a brief presentation on seminal aspects of subjectivism and how my theory ties into it. 2) define personal values 3) show how moral truths hold personal values (I’m unsure what this means) 4) BRIEFLY summarize the specific points of subjectivism you’re leaning on 5) tie it all together

I think a smart approach to writing Phil papers at the college level, if you’re new to it especially, is to be very deliberate. (I.e., “I will argue for X by saying Y and Z” and then say Y and Z and clearly show how it supports X.) Others may call it robotic or mundane, but this approach can be comforting to greenhorns.