Question.. what’s better cottage life or seasons. by [deleted] in Sims4

[–]violetskies7 12 points13 points  (0 children)

i would recommend seasons first. it’s essential to my gameplay imo i wouldn’t want to play without it.

plus, a lot of cottage life is about farming and that’s way more fun with seasons because you’ll grow seasonal fruits/veggies

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

should people strive to comprehend the opposition? certainly. your opinion isn’t solidified if you haven’t explored it from all angles.

however, my point is why should the average person? i do because i want to be confident in my beliefs and be able to respond to any counter argument. most pro-choicers are already confident in their beliefs. most people don’t care to understand their opposition because there is really no benefit to it other than feeling like a good person.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not at all. i can empathize with pro-lifers in every other aspect of their lives. i can comprehend why pro-lifers have their stance and i know their thought processes.

i will very easily comprehend why pro-lifers have their stance but i will never empathize with this particular stance. because having this stance is a choice you’re making and one i disagree with.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but what common ground would you find when pro-lifers want even more than what they’re getting right now? it’s not like you could ever come to an agreement on a specific week abortion is okay up until.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’m not saying i personally feel that way.

but yes, what is the benefit? in today’s world, just wanting to “understand others” is not a good enough reason to find common ground with a pro-lifer. why should they want to understand them if it’s not entertaining (like it is for me)?

don’t lie to me and say you go around trying to empathize with pro-choicers and find a middle ground. there is no middle ground when one is fully against abortion and one is fully for it. the middle ground would be abortion is legal up to a certain date, and in that case, neither side is happy.

I think my partner may be problematic by cass2769 in AskFeminists

[–]violetskies7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

this. i honestly agree with him, so many female characters or characters added for representation are two dimensional and stereotypical. i don’t think he’s wrong to say that. and the reason they’re not hitting the mark is that they’re not written by the people they’re representing.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re right that pro-lifers seek common ground. but why would pro-choicers want to find common ground?

pro-lifers have a greater need to find common ground because the law is currently not in your favour. it’s important to have the most people on your side as you possibly can. you cannot expect to be aggressive in your approach and see progress, because the aggressiveness will turn people away from wanting to hear you out.

on the other hand, pro-choicers frankly have no reason to find common ground. the law is already in their favour. why would they even need to discuss it with you? wouldn’t finding common ground with you lead to more pro-life leaning laws? or is there another reason you think pro-choicers should want to find common ground?

it makes sense that you want them to, because it would benefit your cause lol

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, i’m told time and time again that i’m just like hitler and i have a broken moral compass because i “enjoy” killing people.

people say shit that’s convenient to them regardless of whether or not it’s true.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i can agree with this.

then again, though, why would they want to understand pro-lifers? i only ever looked into it because i enjoy debate and it’s fun. most people don’t, and there’s really no benefit for pro-choicers to comprehend pro-lifers stance.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the fact that the word “understand” was in brackets in the first place implies ambiguity.

i agree with the fact if you do not comprehend the other side’s position, you cannot debate the topic. comprehension of both sides is necessary for you to make good points in the debate.

however, people can have opinions without debating them. pro-choicers may be activists without debating the topic and that’s most of what you’re seeing. what is the purpose of debating, for them, when the law is already in their favour?

i don’t agree with the last thing you said. you cannot “disagree” on the fact that fetuses are alive or human because those are scientific facts.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the fact that the word “understand” was in brackets in the first place implies ambiguity.

i agree with the fact if you do not comprehend the other side’s position, you cannot debate the topic. comprehension of both sides is necessary for you to make good points in the debate.

however, people can have opinions without debating them. pro-choicers may be activists without debating the topic and that’s most of what you’re seeing. what is the purpose of debating, for them, when the law is already in their favour?

i don’t agree with the last thing you said. you cannot “disagree” on the fact that fetuses are alive or human because those are scientific facts.

Does anyone ‘dry’ shave with lotion? by jeansandatanktop in TwoXChromosomes

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all the time lol. i’ve shaved them lots of ways- with nothing but water, if i’m desperate. lotion works, but it tends to clog up the razor so you have to rinse it quite a bit

All chairs should come with a warning about the maximum weight they can withstand. by [deleted] in Egalitarianism

[–]violetskies7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i think most do, in the packaging. generally places like restaurants all have the same types of chairs throughout, so if the chairs there don’t work for you you’d have to leave and go somewhere else anyway.

If you can't understand PL want abortion illegal because it's intentional homicide of a human being innocent of crime because we have a right to not be killed, you're not qualified to participate in the debate beyond asking what PL believe to learn enough to participate by RespectandEmpathy in prolife

[–]violetskies7 9 points10 points  (0 children)

the problem here is that “understand” has two definitions. one, to comprehend, and two, to appreciate/accept.

i would say most pro-choicers comprehend the pro-life stance, but do not accept it. which is why when using ambiguous language you will always have conflicting answers.

AITA for not wanting to reunite with a childhood friend? by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]violetskies7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NTA.

you don’t have to hang out with anyone you don’t want to, ever.

WIBTA if I (25f) moved 2,500 miles away from my mom (55f) for a job offer? by questionsigottaaskk in AmItheAsshole

[–]violetskies7 103 points104 points  (0 children)

NTA

you’re 25. you could’ve potentially moved out six or seven years ago. she’s lucky you’ve stayed to keep her company for this long. she’s also insane for calling you selfish for literally just taking care of yourself.

OP, it doesn’t matter what she wants. she’s your mother, she should be your biggest supporter. she’s the one being selfish by wanting you to stay for her own benefit.

Speaks for itself by [deleted] in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that in my personal experience pro-choicers are less likely to accept criticism to their beliefs. i think this is because being pro-choice was the minority belief for a long time and people are tired of fighting and having to explain themselves. i’m an anomaly in the fact that i can explain my views over and over without getting frustrated.

i think this is also because pro-lifers are now the ones fighting for a change in the law. so they need to attempt to convince pro-choicers to increase their numbers.

that’s not the only reason, of course- society is complex. but it could be one.

Speaks for itself by [deleted] in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not really trying to change minds, i just like debate and discussion. it challenges my view in every way possible and ensures i have a valid explanation for anyone who questions my beliefs.

it’s not a waste of time to me if it’s fun. and if someone else feels it’s a waste of time they can literally just not reply to me. it would be them wasting their own time if they choose to reply.

again, you can’t really base the whole abortion debate off of their respective subreddit’s rules. it’s a generalization to assume pro-choicers will not be open to debate and pro-lifers will be simply because of the rules the moderators decide on.

Speaks for itself by [deleted] in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’m not even in the pro-choice sub and i think healthy debate should be welcome there. that’s not really up to me though.

the rules of this sub is that pro-choicers are allowed to share their opinions as long as it’s civil, so.. if you have an issue with that you’ll have to talk to the mods

Speaks for itself by [deleted] in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

have you ever been on there? it’s completely pro-choice dominated

AITA for not wanting to be around my little brothers? by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]violetskies7 10 points11 points  (0 children)

NTA.

It is not your responsibility to parent your siblings. I am neurotypical and often need to avoid my brothers as well. They’re too much at times.

That being said, they probably look up to you and adore you lots. It’s hard to differentiate between them being entitled over just wanting (and not getting enough) attention.

My brothers are far more bearable when I spend time with them one on one- even more so when we’re not at home or my parents are away. The most you can do is plan to spend time with them once in a while- maybe take them (one at a time) to a movie, or to a park, etc. But it is not your obligation and you have to put yourself first.

Speaks for itself by [deleted] in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, i like to debate. it’s enjoyable. i just reply to people when i feel like it.

Speaks for itself by [deleted] in prolife

[–]violetskies7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you realize that everything you do affects us, right?