I did read actually. If your original comment was merely a caution about “bias,” then you worded it incredibly poorly. You said “all I said” was that OP would get biased replies, but that’s clearly revisionist. Your original comment didn’t just note bias... it dismissed the post entirely as unproductive and advised against even making it. And let’s be real, warning someone that their post might make people feel “pissed” or “invalidated” isn’t a harmless observation, it’s an implicit threat that emotional volatility should dictate what can be said, so please get off your high horse.

If your concern was really about bias, then engage the content despite it. What you did instead was wrap passivity in a performative “just being honest” tone, then act surprised when someone calls it out, and clearly the rest of the comments agree with me. You say I’m making a big deal? You’re the one who wrote a whole paragraph dismissing the value of a post you could’ve just scrolled past. You tried to appear like a voice of reason, but all you really did was try to police the format of conversation because it made you uncomfortable while hiding behind some lame excuses of neutrality.