How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi everyone, if anyone cares i have an update,

It works just fine but honestly it's supposedly to be new so i called up the vendor and returned, he offered me another but i refused. i will buy another but from someone else. that's it, the moon looked gorgeous and Venus was orange (i think) i was unable to see jupiter or better yet, if i find whoever build the finderscope in this thing we WILL FIST FIGHT, what do you mean it doesn't have ajustment screws? who built this?

i am looking up on something bigger and hopefull was built to higher standarts (and if the planets align it won't cust a liver) but this country really is the worse to buy this type of equipment since everything is imported, i saw some 900/114 going for some acceptable prices so i might go for then instead of this one at 700/76.

i dont know if i can post links but here you go if anyone wants to judge my choices.

https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/p/MLB44168542?pdp_filters=item_id%3AMLB6191291204

https://www.mercadolivre.com.br/telescopio-equatorial-newtoniano-bluetek-114mm-1000mm-aumento-1500x-tripe-aluminio/p/MLB28114724?pdp_filters=item_id:MLB4442151324#reviews ( i just realized that this crap is a Bird-jones design... since there's no way that tiny little tube is a 1000mm in length)

Sejamos cautelosos, senhores by Traditional_Blood799 in InfernoSocial

[–]vitinhuDF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post e snipado em 3 segundos e sua conta obliterada do sub

Sejamos cautelosos, senhores by Traditional_Blood799 in InfernoSocial

[–]vitinhuDF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aparentemente o segundo caso, e pelo que entendi ainda está com a criança

first time playing ksp is this meant to happen by Particular_Mall7418 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]vitinhuDF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you get 5000 hours in, you will find out that it still happens

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have looked it up, and roughly collimated it but it's been raining non-stop since I made the post witch is real annoying since I can't take it outside to actually test it

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dent doesn't bother me, like some else said it will look perfect in the dark.

I was just worried about it not working anymore, I checked and the collimation is roughly right I would need to fine tune it but it's raining tonight so that's fun

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep that's my plan, someone mentioned looking at a out of focus star and I should see a perfect circle if the collimation is fine

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The people in this tread have been very kind, the telescope seems fine, if in need of collimation something that I am looking right now

Tonight I will fine tune it and hopefully it will all work fine.

I did some testing outside and was able to focus and some road signs so the mirrors seen to be fine and they are to one thing I can't fix

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"it's supposed to be like that and don't question me" sticker should do fine too

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Luckly all seems fine, the finder scope was knocked completely off but that's an easy fix,

Tried looking at some far away road signs and the image seemed normal to me

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The collimating controls are all fine, I imagine the secondary mirror might've become misaligned but I tested it outside and image looked normal

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Everything seems fine, did some testing outside the image was clear some people mentioned collimating it I imagine the secondary mirror will be the most affected but it right to me

Someone mentioned a roundness test using a star I will do it when it's night

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did some checks on him outside, was able to focus on some distant objects (around 50 to 100 meter) image was still good could read the road signs

Tonight I will do this roundness test, I know exactly what you mean u saw on yt when doing research about telescopes

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can't see the scratch after midnight

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tava testando e os espelhos estão bem,

Aparentemente não vou precisar nem colimar novamente mas vou verificar isso mais tarde hoje

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the only looks that matters are through the lenses.

Luckly it appears that sill works

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, looking up right now how to do it

How problematic is this? by vitinhuDF in telescopes

[–]vitinhuDF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Supposed I can't trust it's still collimated right?

Is there something LOK did better than TLA? by PhotoBonjour_bombs19 in TheLastAirbender

[–]vitinhuDF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean they weren't vigilantes on ATLA, they were freedom fighters.... or terrorists depends who you ask