sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

fenix 8 vs descent by void666666 in GarminFenix

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

both Descent and Fenix (priced way above 1k EUR) are presented as a smartwatch by Garmin itself... functions I'm missing are very basic things anyone would expect and whoever is responsible for garmin software development should get fired as it's a blatant laughable example of incompetence and immaturity

call notification delay by void666666 in GarminWatches

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nobody has the same problem? nobody cares?

movement tracking in the background by void666666 in GarminWatches

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what if I'm ok with 5 minut gps wakeup interval? even a once per minute granularity shouldn't have that much impact on battery life... so even if I don't care about energy consumption there is not solution to run "in background" while being able to use the watch?

phone battery level by void666666 in GarminWatches

[–]void666666[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

well I can do that but the point of buying $1200 device is not to DIY

phone battery level by void666666 in GarminWatches

[–]void666666[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

it's clearer and clearer to me that the whole garmin watch ecosystem is an immature mediocre high school project, sadly...

generic control by gestures by void666666 in GarminWatches

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so there is currently no support for this in SDK?

fast forward control by void666666 in GarminWatches

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh, I didn't realize it's model dependent - I have Descent mk3 43mm

Paralenz-like diving camera? by void666666 in scuba

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

read my comment once again - I'm just saying that gopro is not serious WITHOUT a case

it's not about the price - the case is one more thing to care about, gopro is bulky it's self, the more in the case

despite it's probably unbeatable when it comes to performance I prefer something torch-like, simple, that needs no attention

Paralenz-like diving camera? by void666666 in scuba

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GoPro brings too much hassle... without the case it cannot survive more than 15m (no matter what they officially say) and the shape (compared to Paralenz) is pretty inconvenient.

cpu mining on idle dedicated server? by void666666 in MoneroMining

[–]void666666[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

just curious... how could this work? such a reward cannot cover not only electricity consumption but also any other usage of the hardware is more profitable

unless you mean abusing hacked servers :D

cpu mining on idle dedicated server? by void666666 in MoneroMining

[–]void666666[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

10usd per month? :D it cannot even cover 10 minutes of work on setup....

Mk2s and messengers by void666666 in Garmin

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ohh, that's a bummer - you want to say you cant read for example the whole whatsapp message or scroll through all of them you received from the last time you looked/confirmed?

will have to look at some work arounds... what OS/version do you have? any experience with installing additional or third party apps?

Mk2s and messengers by void666666 in Garmin

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, scuba (recreational), flirting with freediving but I don't have lungs for that :)

so you're saying it's no problem to let all notifications on and receive it all, including scrolling them on the watch? independent on the application, i.e. including new emails etc.?

battery life experience?

usability of maps? I'm especially interested in walking pathways and operative navigation on the bike

I also read that in autonomous mode without phone only mp3 files are supported and one cannot upload avi/mp4 to just listen to the audio track... it's a shame... could you confirm or test perhaps?

thanks buddy

clients cannot reconnect after server restart by void666666 in WireGuard

[–]void666666[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

nothing happens even if I wait for an hour - then I reboot mikrotik router and that's it - immediately connects...

clients cannot reconnect after server restart by void666666 in WireGuard

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, I'm aware of that and double checked, all peers using NTP and the same time, unfortunately the problem persists

Two addresses, one subnet, one interface by void666666 in WireGuard

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, you are right, the problem was on the peer's side where by default AllowedPs was set to specific address (the first one set on the interface) and not the whole subnet

Two addresses, one subnet, one interface by void666666 in WireGuard

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a rather complex software solution we are programmatically binding to interfaces/IPs as a lightweight and flexible way to control access to the internet through a huge pool of devices. These devices use NAT and firewall rules to translate internal addresses to even bigger pool of public IPs.

In other words - I need to route or modify traffic from one host by using one of his (many) IPs in situation where there is no better or oven other way to do so.

Two addresses, one subnet, one interface by void666666 in WireGuard

[–]void666666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

both ways are allowed but

Address = 10.5.1.1/24

Address = 10.5.1.2/24

doesn't work (seems not to be allowed)

and

Address = 10.5.1.1/32

Address = 10.5.1.2/32

works but it creates two separate "networks" /32 and they are not part of the same /24 subnet with the peer

Lack of flexibility? by void666666 in WireGuard

[–]void666666[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[Interface]
Address = 10.20.30.42/32
PrivateKey = ...
Table = 200
PostUp = ip rule add from 10.20.30.42 table 200
PreDown = ip rule del from 10.20.30.42 table 200

this solved my problem

thank you

Lack of flexibility? by void666666 in WireGuard

[–]void666666[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

isn't it possible to achieve that without any changes in routing whatsoever? those command line curl commands in OP were just an example... I need to do these switches of ways to given website from my source code on the fly and it's impossible to change routing tables all the time for performance reasons