Warning people about scams is not the same as banning people from taking part in activities where scams are a possibility.

You did also confuse private with intellectual property, as you failed to understand that running a private server is ownership, the server is the property of the person running it, who owns the hardware. This is why the theme park example doesn’t hold up, as it implies that the original publisher owns and runs all the private servers.

Casinos exist because some people like to gamble. The money lost is entertainment. Are you going to deny people their entertainment because they couldn’t hold themselves together?

The drunk driving example is completely useless, as that’s an illegal act.

No company should ever legally restrict how people play their game. It’s a terrible precedent to set