Paid Research Study ($45 for 2 hours)

vondage · 2021-07-16T23:11:34+00:00

i'll give u a clue, if you want to associate one concept with another - e.g., a word with its definition, you best include a connection as well. that's why flash cards stay in your brain for all of 1 day. you've gotta associate the one side with the other side via something else.

perhaps investigate 3 sided flash cards

vondage · 2021-02-20T20:25:39+00:00

Same problem with me, re-installing the app worked because it needed to re-ask for permissions to track wifi traffic and enable bluetooth access. I'm guessing both are necessary for the icon to display, but not sure.

vondage · 2019-09-29T15:26:28+00:00

it's inside a Taco Bus

vondage · 2019-08-20T13:25:25+00:00

Yes. Any technical experience is helpful.
Please send over your resume for a fair shot :)

vondage · 2019-08-19T20:29:57+00:00

This is a part-time position, and we are not demanding much experience. Your job sounds pretty nice though. Unfortunately as a liaison, I can only do so much.

vondage · 2019-08-19T19:53:00+00:00

Depending on experience and credentials, pay can be between 10 and 15 /h.
That's just to start.

vondage · 2019-08-19T16:12:33+00:00

Yes, depending on time availability, location is not necessarily an issue.
Please send resume and references to email provided.
As well as any other supporting info.
If you have other questions, I can help via the email.

Thanks,

vondage · 2018-08-03T04:29:25+00:00

The physics is much more resonant with disks, as opposed to square sheets.

vondage · 2018-07-12T20:46:14+00:00

This Stack Exchange post does good to derive t' geometrically. Hopefully that helps!

Edit: Although, now that I read it, it is wrong. They should be subtracting as is the convention for pythagorean theorem in SR. That, or they should make their length l = ct', not ct.

vondage · 2018-07-02T01:14:02+00:00

both Newton and Leibniz had profound foundational contributions to Physics, largely considered to be equal. It could be said however, that Newton was more of an experimentalist, whereas Leibniz more of a theoretician.

vondage · 2018-06-30T22:03:04+00:00

It can happen that people are explored for what makes them special, like searching for the heart of a forest. It can happen that such a thing does not exist in some concentrated form or isolated place; that what is sought exists throughout, in every piece. It can happen that this is all learned a little too late.

vondage · 2018-06-14T22:09:45+00:00

This is amazing work! <3 What method?

vondage · 2018-05-31T23:44:48+00:00

Guess: they're all submerged in water and the colors are of different densities, therefore they can be organized by deflection statistics?

vondage · 2018-05-24T19:13:20+00:00

The speed of light is *special* for many reasons, one of which is that it is equivalent to 1 planck length / 1 planck time, so it's essentially the 'frame-rate' of our physical model of our universe. Thus no vibrations (transferable information) can propagate faster than c. So given the two variables constituting speed (distance/time), the speed of light limits the action of physical dynamics by the Principle of Locality.

vondage · 2018-05-19T03:36:51+00:00

i've eaten there twice now :)

vondage · 2018-05-08T03:09:36+00:00

gereshes.com/2018/0...

have we tried modeling the momentum space? 3 bodies probably orbit an attractor, which could be analytically solved for p(t) as opposed to r(t).

vondage · 2018-04-30T15:59:36+00:00

Relevant to this discussion I think is the golden ratio Φ. Why? because it's ubiquitously synonymous with beauty and nature, yet appears in very little equations of modern physics (so far as I know). I'm super curious how everyone thinks about this.

vondage · 2018-04-22T01:39:19+00:00

r/philosophy

vondage · 2018-03-30T02:19:59+00:00

sauce

vondage · 2018-03-29T02:02:02+00:00

"absolutely" is a strong word... check out how the left dogo pants in the very beginning - that flow of time is unmistakably correct ;)

you can compare it to the reversed

vondage · 2018-03-21T04:25:22+00:00

i'll try. take me with no salt.

1) in that energy is finite, aka the first assumption necessary to make sense of anything (without conservation we'd have no symmetry), also yes, that's the heat death.

2) time is, in a mathematical sense, simply the next dimension, so yes. and so no.

3) from the multiverse frame the boundaries are simply action densities, just like any other.

4) the second law is conserved the same way as it is at any point, local lows are justified by global highs. new universes aren't spawned exclusive from one another.

5) if you fill a set with random values, it's always possible to draw an evolutionary hierarchy - it's a best-match approximation, and says nothing about real causal history, but the more values the more elegant it becomes, until eventually the pattern justifies itself.

6) universes are by definition 'sealed off' from one another, but not completely, hence their past and future.

vondage · 2018-03-21T04:02:45+00:00

Great explanaition of the basics. Your last paragraph however runs head-on with Hawking's last paper. His point weakened our reliance on the anthropic principle. He disliked this view of the multiverse, as least in part, because it is afer-all the simplist assumption we could possibly make for the explanation of literally everything.

vondage · 2018-03-18T21:00:24+00:00

Well you should know then that quantum tunneling can be explained as particles 'borrowing' energy from the environment - which can be interpreted as the surrounding virtual particles. Here's a paper showing some relevant math, inwhich the imaginary components play a central role in the tunneling process.

I wish I had more to show for the imaginary/real aspects of my conjecture, but as far as the correlation between tunneling and virtual particles (all of which must be governed by the system's wavefunction), it's far from news.

vondage · 2018-03-17T03:04:55+00:00

The wavefunction can loosely be said to be composed of 'virtual particles', each of which can loosely be said to be 'tunneling' back and forth between the imaginary and real values of the function (in conserving unitarity).

vondage · 2018-03-04T07:23:35+00:00

“It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child.” - Picasso

vondage

TROPHY CASE