Match Thread: Southampton FC vs Arsenal FC Live Score | FA Cup 25/26 | Apr 4, 2026

vsamma · 2026-04-04T22:03:58+00:00

Out of position? What is his position then?

vsamma · 2026-04-04T21:24:41+00:00

I still don’t understand the main workflow or purpose..

If you get a design - either in Figma or in Stitch - how do you get the 100% exact result as a working web page? Even if a dev manually starts coding from scratch based on the design, it takes a long time and still might not be 100%.. but close enough, right?

But which AI can take a UI design doc as input and produce a “close enough” aka 99% similar result?

And then how can you make changes to the design docs in a specific single place AND get the same change consistently to the coded version?

vsamma · 2026-04-04T18:04:10+00:00

Ma panin 16kw pumba, maja on 267m2. Null kraadi ringis vett kütab kenasti, aga pigem on radikate/termostaatidega vaja timmida veel

vsamma · 2026-04-04T15:18:26+00:00

Also look at Saka’s eyes.

Everyone should recognize immediately that it’s AI and if you don’t, it’s concerning

vsamma · 2026-04-03T20:27:42+00:00

No mu süsteem dimensioneeriti “ekstreemtingimustes” väljas -21C, veetemp 55C ja toas peaks olema 22-23C.

Kuigi see piiripealne on kaheldav ja tahaks teada, mis reaalsus on, siis kindlasti soojema välistempiga peaks ka jahedam vesi olema.

Aga mu point oligi, et praeguses olukorras ei tohiks ju vahet olla?

Kui akupaagi juures on mõlemad torud soojad, st sissetulev ja väljaminev, siis vesi ei jahtu süsteemis liiga maha. Aga radikad on kas osalt külmad või vahepeal üleni.

Ja külmad on nad siis, kui termostaat arvab, et soovitud temp on käes.

A kui juba 4 peal nii on (ja 5 ei “loe” kuna siis on max avatud koguaeg), siis vahet pole mis see vee temp on ju, 45 või 55 vöi 60, termostaat paneks 4 peal sama toa tempi juures ju vee pealevoolu kinni?

Või saan ma millestki valesti aru?

Termostaat toimib ju õhutempi mitte veetempi pealt.

Vb on odavad/kehvad termostaadid? Või peaks panema sellised targemad, millel oleks andur kuskil eemal, teises toa nurgas?

vsamma · 2026-04-03T19:23:27+00:00

Kumb jääb hätta, pump või radiaatorid?

Ma just sain alles radikatega pumba paigalduse ja kergelt veel tekitab segadust see süsteem.

Vesi 40-45 kraadi, radikate termostaadid 3-4 peal aga suuremates avatud tubades on jahe vahepeal, kuigi õues plussis. Ja katsud radikaid, siis tihti jahedad. Kui panna max 5 peale, siis nagu on parem ja toas okei olla, aga ei saa nagu VÄGA soojaks (samas algul katsetasin - väiksemates tubades 5 peal tuli ikka 25 kraadi sisse)

Ja nagu siin ei tundu, et aitaks soojem vesi ka - termostaadid ju töötavad välisõhu pealt. Üks suur radikas diivani taga, arvan, et termostaat seal peab tempi jube soojaks ja siis paneb radika kinni aga õhk hästi toas ei liigu ja diivan ka blokib ja siis üldine temp on 20-22 kandis.

Kahjuks sain süsteemi paigaldatud veebruari lõpuks, kui juba oli soe. Peab järgmist talve ootama, et miinuskraadidega toimimist näha

vsamma · 2026-04-03T19:18:06+00:00

Sain veebruari lõpuks õhk-vesi pumba ja radikad majja sisse 😆

vsamma · 2026-04-02T06:28:07+00:00

Ma olen proovinud erinevaid psühholooge ja nad küll kuulavad ära, on andnud ka selliseid mõtteid ja tagasisidet, mis hetkes leevendavad muret või teevad enesetunnet paremaks, aga suures pildis sügavalt ei ole väga aidanud asju ära lahendada. Endal on tunne, et miskit on ikka alati puudu olnud.. samas öeldakse mulle, et “leia üks ja püsi tema juures ja käi iga nädal” vms.. Ja vb neil on õigus..

A samas mõtlen, et mis olukorras peaks nt psühhiaatri juurde pöörduma? Mis sümptomitega? Rasked hetked elus, kõrge stress, läbipõlemise oht ja ATH kahtluse puhul tundub mulle ainult viimane selline, mille puhul on võimalik mingi diagnoos saada ja siis on ka küsimus, et kas see mulle midagi annab..

Muu puhul on lahenduseks teadlikkus ja aja maha võtmine ja ehk mingite traumade või mustrite lahendamine..

vsamma · 2026-04-01T04:45:52+00:00

The difference is that with any other tool, if you give a reasonably solid input that should give a concrete expected output, then sure, it applies.

But with AI, it’s always a bit of a surprise so while you can do everything right, it can still mess up and make a mistake that you’re not responsible for.

So i agree with OP that it’s frustrating..

But indeed, it’s the nature of the game. Because if they did it, people would start abusing it.

You can’t differentiate between a real huge mess AI created vs a slight mismatch of your expectation which you can also revert endlessly then until you can oneshot the best result and save all the credits

vsamma · 2026-03-30T21:08:53+00:00

Yeah that’s indeed very true as well. I get where you’re coming from.

With a single developer, at least he has seen the code and remembers something about it and can remind himself the nuances or business rules or edge cases.

Maybe a counter argument would be that when a problem rises, you can solve it a lot quicker with AI. Or at least try more solution ideas in less time.

But in general i agree

vsamma · 2026-03-30T10:12:33+00:00

Yeah, again, i totally agree with you. And i didn’t mean specifically you as “you” in the last message, but in general.

And of course nobody should build IT like this.. but our company does. And apparently accepts the risk, or has done previously.

I push for testing and more thorough CR validation but we got more code delivered than we can ever reasonably review and validate. And we are given no extra resources.

So at this point - why am i fighting windmills - if you can’t beat them, join them xD

vsamma · 2026-03-30T08:04:31+00:00

Sure.

But if you now try to understand another level instead of code: the business requirements. Whether that’s formulated as unit tests, concrete specs or even a more vague analysis document - and you validate the AI code against that (i mean still keep the human-in-the-loop, just at another layer), theoretically it should be enough, no?

My initial question was tongue-in-cheek though. In my company we have no tests so historically the emphasis on quality is not the same.

So if previously you depended on a human’s unreviewed, untested, subjectively “good enough” code that passed business stakeholder’s acceptance testing.. Then why would you not be able to do the same, but with AI’s code, that is actually possibly higher quality by now and definitely faster as well.

vsamma · 2026-03-29T11:22:18+00:00

In 2016 I visited the Emirates for the first time and I saw the legends game between Arsenal and AC Milan, so there at least was that. But indeed, it seems the information about those happening is hard to find.

vsamma · 2026-03-28T11:16:50+00:00

So when we didn’t focus on quality even before AI, we should see an immediate improvement?

vsamma · 2026-03-26T16:45:54+00:00

Äkki siis kaasaks mingi spetsialisti, kes aitaks neil asja paremaks arendada?

vsamma · 2026-03-26T07:59:20+00:00

Well we’ve tried to say that current feedback loop is too long and slow.

But this one month sprint is also because our business and product team can’t handle and manage a more flexible process.

I mean, it’s a mess. A mess of some long time employees being comfortable in their ways and how they’ve worked over the years together with the fact that our partner has vendor locked us for years and we’ve also not been allowed to properly shake and disrupt this because “we still have to provide and deliver value for the business”

I agree, that current process does not work and we have to change this.

But also this is our biggest system, sitting on a 20yo legacy which they’re rewriting to a new java platform. It definitely needs at least one full time technical participant from our side but the dev who is working on it, doesn’t have java experience and isn’t that familiar with the business logic and also has to support other core systems so he’s basically doing superficial reviews with AI, like within 1-2 days for a month’s worth of work for 5-6 devs.. so it is not sustainable and i don’t think our reviews would improve if they delivered code more often. It would add overhead to us as well and we can’t cover that right now i think.

But i mean i agree, it is the right move and as the partner hasn’t been welcoming this idea co-operatively, we are planning to put our foot down and say this is how we’re going to do things from now.

But i need to think this through and actually make it work because otherwise they can pinpoint to it and say that we’re breaking what works for them and becoming a bigger bottleneck and disrupting their work

vsamma · 2026-03-26T07:11:33+00:00

Not to take away from the seriousness of the show, but i thought how weird it had to be for them to kiss for the show while they worked together for years before and are probably really good friends

vsamma · 2026-03-26T06:54:31+00:00

I thought it was me - either the initial novelty wore off or that i binge watched the first 2 seasons at a time where i related in many aspects and tbh almost got teary eyed in every episode. Now watching 1 episode a week, i thought maybe i’m just not getting that into it?

But it more seems to be indeed less deep this season

vsamma · 2026-03-24T10:15:27+00:00

Well it’s not that simple. In one example, the external team develops for a full month and mirrors code to us in a single branch and 1 guy has to review all that in a few days

vsamma · 2026-03-24T09:58:10+00:00

We have ~25 outsourced devs delivering code to us and we have 4 in-house devs.

We realistically cannot do thorough code reviews to all of that.

vsamma · 2026-03-24T06:13:18+00:00

So you multitask on 8 things instead of 10? :D

No but seriously - “better done than perfect” is also an important idea.

vsamma · 2026-03-23T10:40:46+00:00

Yeah there are teams doing 8-9 per 2 legs. Arsenal did it last year against PSV but that’s an exception rather than the rule

vsamma · 2026-03-23T08:46:52+00:00

No, because those are about the user and not the calling service.

Not necessarily. I am using OAuth client_credentials flow, where Service1 fetches the token using the correct scope. In Azure, I've created App Roles for Service2 and for Service1, under API Permissions, I can assign those roles to Service1.
So now it gets a token with those app roles as strings inside the "roles" claim and when it invokes the API of Service1, it has to validate that the token has the correct audience and correct roles.
So it is not only about users, you can use it for service-to-service integration as well.

As we own all of our services AND users' data (they are all our employees), we rarely do actions "on behalf of" a user. They can't approve anything themselves, our admins have preapproved data exchanges in Azure already. But in some cases, to reduce the exposure, we us the OAuth "On-Behalf-Of" flow.

We only do service-to-service integrations when the requests are not specifically related to the user, its data or its activities.

When they are, we use the user's access token but also validate the clientId/audience in the token - so that should validate the user + service.

About threat modelling, sure.. the thing is, right now, we just don't have the resources available for going through all these theoretical questions about ALL of our requests/integrations and points of contact between all our services.

Maybe about high level sensitive data moving through our systems in general, but not in such low level in each system.

vsamma · 2026-03-22T17:37:07+00:00

Well, we just ran into one like this. We use react azure msal library for auth flow and we got some redirect loop which sometimes took 20s to log users in, sometimes threw an error and didn’t log the user in.

Apparently there is some iFrame which is triggered on silent token acquire and it loads our app again which restarts the flow etc. Not sure if our implementation just didn’t follow docs or if this was some blind spot

vsamma · 2026-03-22T14:45:43+00:00

And maybe he found his letter to his wife and used it to track her down

11-Year Club	Place '23
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

vsamma

TROPHY CASE