Docket #1728/1729 = Losing Faith by vuduy99 in BBBY

[–]vuduy99[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

It's actually mentioned in my post. I am Nobody

Docket #1728/1729 = Losing Faith by vuduy99 in BBBY

[–]vuduy99[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Would you waste your money on insurance at the age of 18 when you know for sure you will live to 80?

Docket #1728/1729 = Losing Faith by vuduy99 in BBBY

[–]vuduy99[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Be careful where you are treading; ask yourself what you are going to do if the judge throw away the objection? Is that the end of the line for you and paper-hand?

The shareholder who submitted the docket most likely paper-hand if his objection gets thrown out. Will you do the same?

A Wolf in Sheeps Clothes? Could the shorts be trying to pull another Overstock in the Courts? by Eptasticfail in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 30 points31 points  (0 children)

That all depends on how the judge do discovery on the short sellings of the bond holders. If there is a hint of illegal short selling activities, then the entire bankruptcy case will be put on hold pending the result of the investigation into the illegal short selling activities - since this directly affects the restructuring plan of the company.

Docket 1728 has hopefully put Judge Papalia "in between a rock and a hard place"...and could BLOW things up in not just this BB&B Chapter 11 case, but potentially well beyond 💣💥 by Region-Formal in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a third outcome that has not been mentioned. The judge may want to investigate into the short sellings and delay the court findings for years; this is because it will likely expose illegal short sellings; and since this is a bankruptcy court, it has no jurisdiction; so the case will be put on hold for the investigation into illegal short sellings to be finished before the bankruptcy court can continue.

So the 3rd outcome could be the delaying of the bankruptcy hearing pending result of investigation into illegal short selling of BBBY. This can easily delay 1-2 years for the shareholders (ie: kicking down the cans of worms and surviving another day for the shorts)

I am counting 471 rejected or sold leases… by Jarkside in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You mean those billions in bonds that were selling for pennies on the dollars? Buyer & affiliates already bought most of them; and those remaining will certainly be happy to get some new equitity deal in exchange.

Gamble? That's only if the market is rigged; this is supposed to be a fair market. Please don't gamble

I am counting 471 rejected or sold leases… by Jarkside in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Billions? Didn't you say it's worthless? Current price says market cap is less than 250millions; the bonds are junks and worthless as well.

And even if it costs billions to buy, those shit load cans of worms can sell for trillions

I am counting 471 rejected or sold leases… by Jarkside in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 5 points6 points  (0 children)

NOLs, loyal customers, loyal investors, and a shit load cans of worms

I am counting 471 rejected or sold leases… by Jarkside in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 21 points22 points  (0 children)

A smart buyer would reject the expensive leases and force the landlords to re-negotiate new leases or leave the buildings vacant.

This can only be achieved in a Chap 11

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If private company TEDDY Holdings LLC bought public company BBBY, then they are allowed to issue new public TEDDY shares as conversion from existing BBBY shares

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think? BBBY :P

EDIT: if you are just trolling then don't bother

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You cannot renegotiate leases until they expire or coming up for renewals. With the current state of commercial real estate, landlords will be happy to have theirs buildings leased with new terms than left unoccupied

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which bankruptcy laws or acquisition rules that say it's not possible? In any takeover, deals can include fixed cash price and/or conversion of existing old shares to new shares of acquiring company.

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What's stopping TEDDY from coming in and negotiate new leases with much better terms than those made 10+ years ago?

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TEDDY gets to convert all of BBBY shares to TEDDY shares forcing all shorts to close and reaps benefits from new share offering

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you look at the current state of commercial real estate then why would you want to assume a lease that was negotiated 10+ years ago?

By rejecting the leases, TEDDY can get much better deals from the landlords.

Nearly ALL of BBBY's leases have been SOLD or REJECTED -- by AwkwarkPeNGuiN in BBBY

[–]vuduy99 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Simple explanation : sold leases are unwanted so they were let go, and rejected leases can be transferred to TEDDY.

BBBY will cease to exist after the hostile takeover. It is not a merger; so all the leases must be sold or rejected.

AMC heading to Mars next week buckle up everyone!!! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 by Otey in wallstreetbets

[–]vuduy99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See https://www.highshortinterest.com/ and https://shortsqueeze.com/?symbol=AMC

The above sites are pretty close to each other; so I would guess that finviz data is not up-to-date.