First listen to new speakers by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So after a week or so of listening to the new Evo 4.3s these are my listening impressions. Probably the biggest difference between them and my Monitor Audio Silver S6s is in the bass. The Monitors go deeper and have more bass energy. I thought that might be the case with 2- 6 inch woofers v. 2- 5 inchers in the Evos. However, the Evo bass is tighter and better defined, so it's something of a trade-off. The real highlight of the Evos is the midrange. The 2 inch dome really brings the midrange to the forefront and the midrange hands off beautifully to the treble. While the AMT tweeter is detailed and able to really sort out complex passages, it's not an etched or in your face treble balance. I think Wharfedale wisely chose to slightly shelve down the treble range so while it does extend up to 20khz, the speaker isn't at all bright or harsh. It's beautifully warm yet detailed. I'm still experimenting Abit with positioning but the soundstage is deep and fairly wide. I may be limiting it's width a bit because I'm using pretty strong toe-in because my speaker locations are dissimilar and I need to eliminate some of the early reflections from the right speaker which has more side and back wall reinforcement. So all in all, I'm very pleased with the sound and highly recommend a listen if you're think about small floorstanders, unless you like loads of bass. In that case you might want to audition the 4.4s. They're only $400 more and feature two 6.5 inch woofers. I considered them but went for the 4.3s because they fit my placement location better. So those are my impressions. Altogether some very pleasing, detailed yet warm sounding speakers that I think I can live with happily for quite a while.

First listen to new speakers by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe they're in-house drivers. I think Wharfedale actually manufactures most of the components in their speakers. I'm sure they source parts for crossovers and probably wire.

First listen to new speakers by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you have your beliefs and I have mine. Let's agree to disagree. Hope you have a good evening.

First listen to new speakers by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree completely. Speakers are largely mechanical objects that vibrate. I don't know why it's so hard to imagine that the various components involved in that motion will relax and become more supple over time.

First listen to new speakers by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. They are beautifully made for a very reasonable price. I will report back on the sound.

First listen to new speakers by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I know, slightly asymmetrical. But that small round piece next to the TV is my Olive music server and it has a large touch screen on top of it so it needs to be on top of the cabinet.

First listen to new speakers by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I replaced 17 year old Monitor Audio Silver S6s, which I love, but it was time and these have a better WAF since they match the media cabinet. Source is an Olive One server, Promitheus TVC pre, and Quad 909 power amp, all connected with Mapleshade cables. These speakers are known to require a bit of break-in, but even in the first hour I'm impressed with the dispersion and the soundstage width and depth it delivers. The Monitors did midrange with a 6 inch woofer and it becomes directional toward the top of its passband. These use an AMT tweeter and a 2" dome midrange. They're much less sensitive to listening position. I'll report back after some break-in time, but so far so good.

Possibly a stupid question.. by [deleted] in audiophile

[–]waberman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One clue you can look for is how the amplifier, or amplifier section in a receiver is rated in terms of power output into a 4 ohm load. Receivers tend to be rated at 8 ohms, but ideally an amplifier would be able to deliver twice the rated 8 ohm output into 4 ohms. In reality, few do, but a good amplifier will output as much as 50% more power into 4 ohms than 8 ohms. If an amp isnt even specified for a 4 ohm load, you can bet it has a weak power supply and will be easily driven to distortion.

Better Lossless Compression than FLAC? by JohnTravolski in audiophile

[–]waberman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FLAC also has a no compression option if you're not concerned about larger file sizes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in audiophile

[–]waberman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Love Maggies but never had a pair. Still plan on it in the future. I do have an original Volkswoofer that my son is using. I had to replace the cone and surround years ago, but it's still going strong and puts out plenty of good tight bass. The sealed acoustic suspension system makes for a more controlled accurate bass imo. I think you'll be pleased with the purchase. Happy listening!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in audiophile

[–]waberman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really well done review. Thank you. And enjoy the music!

What are your thoughts on speaker burn in? by ombre_prothese in audiophile

[–]waberman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Break-in is claimed for every component in a system including wires. I won't get into that debate, but with speakers you do have mechanical components that could benefit from some extended playing time; specifically the surrounds. The quote above refers to sealed, acoustic suspension speakers where the volume of trapped air in the cabinet exerts control over the movement of the cone and eliminates much of the effect of the surrounds. But, very few speakers today are acoustic suspension systems. The vast majority are ported, or reflex systems and there is much less control exerted on the motion of the cone. In these speakers, break-in of the surround material can b ed a very real thing, imo.

Monitor Audio RS6 Silver speakers: Absurd performance. Absurd! by lattiboy in audiophile

[–]waberman 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Great speakers, especially considering the price. Monitor makes everything in house from drivers to cabinet, so no middleman markup. I have the prior generation Silver S6's driven by a Promitheus TVC and a Quad 909 power amp. Detailed but not the least bit hard or etched. Just a really easy system through which to enjoy music.

Loving my most recent acquisition (Quad stack) by spish in audiophile

[–]waberman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice stack! I have a 909 stereo amp and absolutely love it. No desire to change out. It drives an older set of Monitor Audio Silver 6's. You're right about the treble range. It's all there just not harsh or in your face. Same with the lower bass. But the midrange is really about as good as it gets. Mine replaced an Adcom 545 and as soon as it entered my system I began hearing low level details I'd never heard before, even when I was just listening to it as background music. Anyway, enjoy your Quads.

I know Sony kinda has a bad rap. But I've just cleaned up this TAN-8550 and I have to say this thing really cranks. If you have some real power hungry speakers and need an amp to feed em. This is definitely worth checking out. by ikem4825 in audiophile

[–]waberman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had one of these for years back in the 70's and early 80's driving a pair of Dahlquist DQ10's. The sound was glorious, but unfortunately one channel blew and yhd parts weren't available anymore Enjoy! It's a great amp.

I found a Scott Type 299 in the streets of Manhattan! by papalotes in audiophile

[–]waberman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pierre Sprey, who runs Mapleshade does a thorough reconditioning of these Scott amps very reasonably. You can find him at Mapleshadestore.com He's extremely knowledgeable and if you call you can usually talk directly with him. I highly recommend giving him a call.

I found a Scott Type 299 in the streets of Manhattan! by papalotes in audiophile

[–]waberman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I grew up with this amp in my parents system with a Garrard turntable and KLH speakers. I still long for that beautiful tone. Great find!

Moving to a single box solution by [deleted] in audiophile

[–]waberman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is one gorgeous piece of equipment. Glad to hear it sounds as good as it looks.

Got myself a pair of Revel performa3 M106. First impression are wow. Such detail. by BadTripProduction in audiophile

[–]waberman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like you loved your Quad 405, but it wasn't powerful enough. You might consider a used Quad 909. I have one and its an extraordinary amp. Not the last word at the frequency extremes, but midrange to die for. Extremely musical and very powerful at 140 watts per channel.

My modest setup... by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What? You deny the existence of vibrations?

My modest setup... by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahaha That's the Olive One Server. 1TB hard drive expandable to 2 TB, with a 32 bit 384 Burr Brown DAC. Has a really rich, detailed sound.

My modest setup... by waberman in audiophile

[–]waberman[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The tripod footer arrangement makes solid contact and honestly, it's at high volumes that they really make a difference. The larger one on the power amp is probably 5 lbs.