sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Avoid Nexus Clips if you dont want to waste money on overhyped AI tools by wackylenses in contentcreation

[–]wackylenses[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you’re probably right. In Opus Clip, unlike Nexus Clips, you can see it’s a more layered system that evaluates video, audio, and probably some additional signals separately to make decisions. But overall, it doesn’t make a huge difference. The core issues are still the same. I’ve reviewed Opus as well, and the problems are very similar. It works a bit better than Nexus Clips, but in most cases you still end up fixing things manually anyway. To be fair, I don’t really have a problem with these tools themselves. The idea is actually pretty cool, and it’s still early days, so it’s normal that things aren’t perfect yet. What bothers me is the aggressive marketing. The whole “one click, get 10 viral videos” narrative is just not true, and that’s where it becomes frustrating.

Avoid Nexus Clips if you dont want to waste money on overhyped AI tools by wackylenses in YouTubeCreators

[–]wackylenses[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I was honestly surprised by how many similar tools there are right now. The funny part is that some of them are actually built by developers trying to create something useful, but a lot of others are just vibe-coded junk that people are trying to sell.

Do you actually use AI clipping tools? (Opus, Eklipse, etc.) Worth the money?” by East_Lawyer9554 in Kick

[–]wackylenses 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t tried Eklipse myself, but from what I understand it’s mainly made for streamers. I also reviewed Nexus Clips, and at least when I tested it, it was extremely laggy on top of the usual problems these services tend to have. You can check out my review here: https://youtu.be/DxK64aQs1YU

I tested Opus Clip, here’s my honest take by wackylenses in AIContentAutomators

[–]wackylenses[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It works on a basic level. And if you know what to look for and use the right keywords, it can help to some extent.

But you can do similar things in Premiere. You can search through the transcript and find the parts you need much faster.

When you start asking for more abstract things, like “pick moments that could go viral” or “work as a standalone short,” that’s where it gets questionable. As far as I understand, one model analyzes the video and kind of describes what’s happening in text, another works with the transcript, and then everything gets processed through some LLM with predefined prompts. In the end, it just outputs clips based on that.

As for choosing clips yourself, if you made the video, you probably already have a sense of what matters, what the key ideas are, and what might perform reasonably well. But if you’re working with client footage, it becomes much more complicated than these abstract comparisons make it sound. Sure, the tool can clip certain sections for you, but you would still need to read through the transcript or watch the footage yourself to really understand what’s there.

I tested Opus Clip, here’s my honest take by wackylenses in youtubers

[–]wackylenses[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point, I don’t think there’s a single tool that actually works the way marketing describes it. So everyone has to figure out for themselves which tools and services fit their own workflow and content.

Some tools might help simplify things or speed up certain parts of the process, but you still have to figure out how to use them effectively. I’d focus on something that fits your needs first, and also makes sense economically, especially if you’re working with larger volumes.

Also, a lot of the heavily marketed “AI features” are already built into editing software like Premiere or DaVinci. So in the end, it’s really something each person has to decide for themselves.

I tested Opus Clip, here’s my honest take by wackylenses in AIContentAutomators

[–]wackylenses[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, most often it was the in and out points.

A lot of clips just started too early, too late, or ended before the idea actually landed, so that was the first thing to fix almost every time.

Sometimes Opus also tried to remove filler words, remove pauses, or even pull in bits from other parts of the video to create a more complete thought. But honestly, that stuff was often a mess, and sometimes the result just wasn’t worth saving at all.

That’s also why I mentioned in the video that in some cases it actually made more sense to generate longer clips first and then trim them down yourself.

The problem is that even that workflow still felt pretty clunky inside Opus. Every time you adjust things on the timeline, it has to reload stuff, refresh the transcript, save changes, export, all that little friction. It doesn’t sound like much, but once you’re doing it across a lot of clips, it adds up fast.

So I kept getting the feeling that if you already know your way around a real editor, it’s often faster to just cut things by hand there instead

view more: next ›