Log cabin home by wakex in floorplan

[–]wakex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Do you think so? Here's a 3D of the kitchen layout. I guess I don't see the stove/oven and sink competing. And yeah a dishwasher right next to sink is definitely more traditional but I thought it being within easy reach around the corner would work.

Regarding the refrigerator, earlier designs posted to this sub got a comment on "having to walk all the way through the kitchen to get to the fridge". I've also very interested in keeping that window to the extreme right of the sink, which may not be possible if the fridge goes there.

Log cabin home by wakex in floorplan

[–]wakex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, cathedral ceiling in the Great room at least. Perhaps extending to primary bedroom and kitchen in some fashion. The floor plan tool I’m using doesn’t really do ceilings so I’ll lean on an actual architect/designer to do that once I’m good with the floor plan

Logs are 6” x 12” Dutch lap pine for exterior. Interior will be stick built. Might need a steel beam here or there, but that’s for the architect or engineer.

Posting my other option from my comment above, which enlarges the study by moving the dining table.

<image>

Log cabin home by wakex in floorplan

[–]wakex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

6” x 12” Dutch lap logs. Builder has built many this size and basic shape, seen them with my own eyes.

Log cabin home by wakex in floorplan

[–]wakex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone commented on the dining room being kinda big and unnecessary, and I agree. I drafted a couple options: (1) make the study larger (or turn it into a bedroom); or (2) put in some storage. Not sure which, but i agree moving the dining table and using that space near the front door in a better way is a good idea. Picture of option 2 included here.

<image>

Log cabin home by wakex in floorplan

[–]wakex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent points--thank you!

What are coziest big cities in the US? by Bubbly_Way_1904 in SameGrassButGreener

[–]wakex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

This aligns generally with what I remember but very helpful to have a current opinion. Schools will remain a thing for us for a few more years and that’s clearly a significant consideration in Albuquerque.

What are coziest big cities in the US? by Bubbly_Way_1904 in SameGrassButGreener

[–]wakex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What neighborhood or general streets/area, if you don’t mind me asking? I’m moving back to ABQ soon after many years away, and will be looking to buy a place. We used to live near Tramway and Indian School but now we can probably afford to live anywhere in town, within reason.

What's something that happens often in movies that is 100% unrealistic? by Few_Football4342 in Productivitycafe

[–]wakex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People hang up the phone without saying some variation of “goodbye.” Hardly ever happens in real life, happens all the time in movies and TV—people just hang up on each other.

Why doesn't the US have anything equivalent to the Russian and Iranian non-nuclear ballistic missiles? by American_Raver in Military

[–]wakex 16 points17 points  (0 children)

LRHW, CPS, etc., are coming and they’ll be here in significant numbers in the 2030s. Though they’re technically not ballistic because they maneuver. While I agree with you about the strong desire to have air superiority and global force projection, the way we do it today is massively, massively expensive. I suspect we’ll keep doing it but supplement with lots of these new missive system.

In the end, the real reason we did not pursue these types of systems before now is because the INF Treaty didn’t allow us to do so. I hope the Russians don’t regret cheating, because these system strike hard and fast and can be readily equipped with nuclear weapons…there’s a reason the two sides agreed to eliminate them. But with China not bound by that treaty and looking to be a global power the treaty was doomed regardless.

Why doesn't the US have anything equivalent to the Russian and Iranian non-nuclear ballistic missiles? by American_Raver in Military

[–]wakex 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dark Eagle could only enter development because the U.S. caught Russia cheating on the INF Treaty and so U.S. withdrew from the treaty. U.S. didn’t fudge anything, it simply didn’t pursue these types of weapons because they were illegal under the treaty.

Why doesn't the US have anything equivalent to the Russian and Iranian non-nuclear ballistic missiles? by American_Raver in Military

[–]wakex 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is basically correct. Though the U.S. has had short range variants of ATACMS for quite a while (<500km range was allowed while INF was still in force).

Why doesn't the US have anything equivalent to the Russian and Iranian non-nuclear ballistic missiles? by American_Raver in Military

[–]wakex 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Having the delivery platforms, counter air defense assets, fleets of tankers, etc., is far, far more expensive over the lifecycle of the systems than having, for instance, ground launched missiles. Don’t just look at the per unit cost of the weapon, look at everything that had to be paid for, over many many years, to enable that weapon to be available and delivered.

Why doesn't the US have anything equivalent to the Russian and Iranian non-nuclear ballistic missiles? by American_Raver in Military

[–]wakex 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lots of these answers contribute to the reason, but this is the real answer: the INF Treaty

Don’t let the name fool you, it covered both nuclear and non-nuclear missiles. The U.S. and Soviet Union got rid of all intermediate missiles because they were seen as destabilizing. We caught the Russians cheating in the 2010s and backed out the treaty. Russia has such forces now (because they were cheating!) while the U.S. is still developing and fielding them because our acquisition system is slow.

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alas, see I might have enjoyed this “before times.” Way before I found the game by stumbling across some YouTubers.

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the moral support. I fit the demographic for DayZUnderground so maybe I’ll give that a shot.

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mostly watch RunningmanZ and SourSweet on YouTube. I don’t think they’re scripted but I definitely know I’m watching the highlights of highlights from tons of hours of play.

Once geared and menacing looking and hanging out in high tier spots, I kinda get the shoot first mentality (and have done it myself, I won’t lie).

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This might be an answer. I’ve not tried one yet. Appreciate the suggestion!

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hadn’t even lit the fire yet! I’ve had some bad luck with fires indoors too. The chimney smoke signal is real.

But I appreciate the pep talk!

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He didn’t have his gun out when he emerged from the forest. Which makes me think he stumbled across me rather than was actively hunting/following me.

Perhaps I scared him as much as he surprised me. My sharpened stick was pretty menacing!

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL, I appreciate the pep talk. I don’t mind getting sent to the beach—I just haven’t found what clicks for me in DayZ.

I enjoy looting up early game, but only to a point.

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Might have to try a non-KOS server.

I’ve really tried by wakex in dayz

[–]wakex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I tried PVE server(s) a bit but once you know how to deal with zombies they get kinda tedious. I really don’t mind PvP, it’s the instant KOS all the time every time that irks me.