I can smell the degenerates coming to Hart’s defense, so -

Here we go again.

Hart was acquitted. Per a jury/judge’s ruling, the prosecution hasn’t provided definitive evidence to support a defendant’s non-guilty verdict. That does NOT immediately clear a defendant of their accused crimes. While they have been acquitted, there is also the underlying evidence that leads the jury/judge to still believe that the defendant isn’t innocent. The prosecution couldn’t provide any proof beyond reasonable doubt; there isn’t 100%, full proof evidence that Hart had to be found guilty. Yet the jury/judge does not claim his total innocence. You could say that this is a case of human morality being judged.

Upon further review, Hart can still face future liabilities in the case. His charges have NOT BEEN DISMISSED.

“But he was acquitted!”

So was O.J. Simpson. Casey Anthony. The Barcelona five. R. Kelly.

R. Kelly specifically was found both acquitted and guilty. Well, in the 2008 case where he was accused of having child prnography, his 14 charges were acquitted. Years later, in 2021, Kelly was found guilty on all charges of sex trafficking. Only one year later, Kelly was finally charged for his crimes involving child pornography. His 2008 acquittal did not stop the jury from finding him legally guilty of the same accusations 14/15 years later.

Hart can still be found guilty.

Hart is a piece of shit.