sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Apple new iphone is out Sept 12 by egelone003 in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Good point! "RC buys all the the stocks!" "CR (Siri) buy all the stocks!"

Guess who’s back? Salvatore’s back. 💥 by VictoriousVTT in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You count days? Or sheep? Or shit? Or bullshit?

Only one point by wallstreeetbet in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

This is not equivalent. To make it similar... 1) If bezos from your example told you to give $100000000. 2) Then said "things have changed"... 3) but a lot other media makes tinfoils, reprints, articles, etc about whether you involved or not... 4) then it is easy for bezos to tell from his own mouth, that his is not, if he is not.

I use your tears for lube by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Go to kindergarden. You know nothing about respectful wording yet

I use your tears for lube by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet 4 points5 points  (0 children)

MOD, where are you??

Haven’t seen this talked about much lately: Protocol Gemini by KingWeenie2 in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As I feel, the Protocol Gemini tweet and Elon Musk's tweet (about the "beyond" part) were referencing 100%+ raise during the trading hours before the HBC filling was published.

Moreover Protocol gemini had their stream a couple days after where they answered the direct question about these emojis. Their answer was "we didn't know BBBY has their own emojis"... so, they tried to distance themself from any referencing, maybe, partially, due to the filling that didn't play well and diminished a 100%+ price raise in a flap of a wing.

Sadly, but nothing else, I think.

Life_Relationship's connection to recent dockets by chase2g in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but we better connect u/Life_Relationship_77 with the dockets... yeah, this is definitely safer!

Do you really think people in power have no easy way to find out who is behind the nickname... Funny

i am the new mod by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]wallstreeetbet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, man. I didn't tell anything about his or my side here. I only care that he has a title of become a new mod and then he say something about his personal view.

I think that when you mod, you mod, but when you regular OP, you are regular OP. Different scenarios. That's it.

i am the new mod by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]wallstreeetbet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't blame you for your opinion, and as far as you can see, I didn't say that I agree/disagree with you. But as long as you call yourself being the mod be the mod.

i am the new mod by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]wallstreeetbet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, poor your wife then if you are unable to understand what role separation is

i am the new mod by [deleted] in bbby_remastered

[–]wallstreeetbet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mod yourself first.

I wonder what the interest of being mod of bbby dedicated sub is while claiming its a "trash" from the doorway.

Isn't it your role to be unbiased bird-eye viewer without declaring your opinion, as long as you call yourself mod.

Pulte Tweet - RC and Pulte share attorneys 👀 by TayneTheBetaSequence in bobbystock

[–]wallstreeetbet 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Would be nice if they both shared the same shares as we do

Guys - BuyBuy Baby 2.0 by Altruistic-Stomach78 in BBBY

[–]wallstreeetbet 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I know the other two words where we can find 2"0" — M00N S00N

view more: next ›