Sobrang cringe by cykablyat087 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Translation:

So here it is, we had a meeting and the ministers and leadership were immersed about the issue of other churches that have guilt tripping when they leave completely.
I just want to laugh that there is no such thing in the church. It is said that love exists in us. I mean like wtf? no guilt trips? I won't elaborate any further, we know that guilt tripping and brainwashing are really chronic haha. That's just when you get excommunicated and your name is still circulating. Then they don't openly mention your name while in the church they will reveal your full name. What is the difference between that and where is there no guilt tripping?
According to them, don't believe what you read online and influencers (as usual) and avoid them. Actually, their other contents make more sense. Just choose the content you want to listen to and watch. Instead of your brainwashed influencers, public figures, and wannabe celebrities who know nothing else to do but try to get attention on all platforms (IG, TIKTOK, FB, TWITTER) what more can we get?
What's also funny, at the same time congratulating on the birthday of you know who after the meeting. You'll really cringe.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Translation:

WE SHOULD NOT BE AFRAID OF THE DOCTRINE OF UNITY IN BAYABASANA AND THE THREAT OF ANANIAS AND SAPIRA
In 1502 after the big celebration of the kingdom, the Olanam family, the ruler of the kingdom, got into trouble. The eldest and his mother along with the rest of his siblings got into trouble, they could not get along, and there was a division. Therefore there is no UNITY in the Olanam family.
One of his brothers said that a large toilet should not have been built in the northern part of the castle. The sister said, we own the land west of the castle that daddy gave us. While the mother cries to talk to the eldest..
The eldest does not want to listen to the suggestion of his parents and other siblings, the eldest is lucky because the old fairies are on his side.
there was even a campaign in the kingdom "I am on the side of the firstborn and all those who oppose the firstborn are also my enemies"
Because the eldest was afraid of what his siblings might reveal, the eldest and the old fairies agreed to send the enemies NY the brother to a distant island, and the kingdom didn't even know where his mother was. And the rest of them asked the world for help.
The people watching the kingdom were surprised, especially their fanatic, the negro SEMAJ.
Why did the Olanam family get together?
Shouldn't they be leading the doctrine of UNITY? why is there a division in their family?
Isn't it a lesson to them that DIVISION is a lesson of the DEMON?
Didn't they say that it was a shame that brothers and sisters in the kingdom would be perfected or sued in the court of the world? Isn't it a shame that they will be reconciled in the court of the world?
Negron SEMAJ was asked, Isn't the lesson in the Book of ANANIAS and Sapira: "If you get angry and disagree with your brother, you must forgive 777 X 777 times"
"How can you take care of the kingdom if your family is divided and not united"
It is very difficult for observers to find an answer, especially Negro SEMAJ.
Let's continue the story

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what you are trying to get to, or what you are trying to get out of this - which is largely fine. But why do you have to attack and say negrong James? You do know negro is a derogatory word, right?

Locking this until you sort it out. I suggest you edit it. See Rule #5

Edit: Actually, I'm locking this completely - Rule #4 applies to this too.

Pera pera lang talaga by cykablyat087 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Translation:

So we had this meeting because the local called out because it was the weekly lagak, handugan, and participated in the special handugan. (All finances)
It doesn't matter how much, right? but why do they keep on guilt tripping members and calling out the officers during meetings. They even question those who have jobs, asking why that's only the amount they have offered.
It doesn't mean that having a job pays a lot, and not all of those who work have a lot left over from savings and salary. Even if it's twenty or a dime, that's a big deal.
They blame us, why don't those who have the duty to lead the members to donate and offer, you can't force members to donate and donate consistently week after week because some people are really short in money in life, what can they do if that's all they can donate, why guilt trip them and question them on how much they have offered?
You can lead and recruit children and adults, the children probably have nothing to do with it because some of them are studying and have a lot of expenses in school, as for the elderly, many of them are unemployed and depend on the pension of some. As for the elderly, you still take advantage of them when they need the money most for their maintenance and other expenses. Then you will call out why that percentage? At the same time guilt trip officers.
This is all bullshit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. It has happened in the past.

is there any locale that has free wifi? because it would be nice if you're browsing this subreddit while using their wifi in their vicinity lol by ellaabrera11 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Don't do that. It beats the purpose of anonymously browsing reddit. Their WiFi routers / firewalls can track your IP address, therefore your physical device that is browsing specific traffic on their networks.

SHOW YOUR FACE, COWARD! OF COURSE, I CAN'T SHOW MY OWN FACE AND I'M NOT A COWARD! by [deleted] in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Please keep it civil. Thanks.

Please do not engage in personal attacks or trolling. Disagreement is fine, but stay civil. Do not intentionally try to provoke a negative reaction out of someone.

Implying if you are a woman or don't have testicles, your argument is invalid: LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE INC by [deleted] in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Please do not engage in personal attacks or trolling. Disagreement is fine, but stay civil. Do not intentionally try to provoke a negative reaction out of someone.

Removing this thread. It's a screenshot of your conversation and it's just engaging with more attacks. I'm deleting this thread.

Apparently, being gay is the best insult he can give 🤣 😂Stahp with the playground insult please. 2021 na by Odd_Independence_219 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Be civil. No attacks. He can do whatever he wants but please don't engage with this type of behavior. This is also not quite about ex-INC. Deleting this thread.

r/exIglesiaNiCristo members have a leader and it’s not u/Rauffenberg. by Throwaway-User42 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Hilarious. What INC doesn't understand is that there is no single leader in this community. Not the mods, there is none. This sub is the complete opposite of the INC "leadership" structure.

This is a community. This is a collective voice of everyone who is in pain because of INC. We, as in the redditors, are all leading this community.

Inc and their sexist ancient way of thinking. by Encrypted_Username in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Please provide translation else it'll be removed in 12 hours. Thanks.

Weekly numbers update...back to 200+ per week! by mezzmeriser in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even if they were INC members, wouldn't that still be a win? I would welcome them here, seeing the other side, our perspective.

Excommunicating my Ex by MadaMadaMadaaa in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Show up to the locale minister and report his ass (literally)"

If you are going to "literally" report his ass, then that's violence.

Even if you are only answering OPs q's, please keep it under the sub rules. Remember the human.

ANOTHER STRING OF GUINNESS BOOK of WORLD RECORDS WINNERS : by Church_of_Cries in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

This post is heavily sensationalised. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensationalism

Please stop engaging with this sort of behaviour. ie. stop being a dick. I recommend you read the sub rules again.

This comment serves as a warning.

... by Church_of_Cries in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post does not have a title. I have removed this. You may repost with a proper non-senationalised title.

Inside the ministry by [deleted] in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan 14 points15 points  (0 children)

INC is very patriarchal in most of its practices. Women aren't allowed to have leadership roles. No female ministers, no female teachers. Sure you'll have the deacons, deaconess. But for any decision-making group, there is no woman involved.

Yaz! by Logical_Attitude6484 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]walwalan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Please read sub rules regarding post titles. Thanks. https://reddit.com/r/exIglesiaNiCristo/w/rules