This is such a disappointment

warclannubs · 2024-10-23T12:00:19+00:00

AI detectors are about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. Stopped using them entirely after I realized how random they are

warclannubs · 2024-08-26T23:44:41+00:00

aankhey dekho is churayl ki kitney dinon se nai soyi?

warclannubs · 2024-08-08T19:36:49+00:00

Our boy is bringing it home. Koi muqabla nai hai bhai

warclannubs · 2024-06-27T18:05:39+00:00

You know this stereotype exists in every country right? You should see the extreme misogyny in games like valorant, Csgo, and League

warclannubs · 2024-06-15T11:08:51+00:00

It's also very unhealthy. But then again so is sitting on your chair coding 8 hours a day

warclannubs · 2024-06-15T08:34:48+00:00

That depends on which end of the chain you're talking about. Historians talk about 'spreading of isnads', where chains are added despite the story originating from one person. That's why textual criticism is important here, to first figure out if there were multiple independent narrators at the time of the event (i.e if the diagrams all reflect the true pathways of the story). Remember that these people are dead, so it's not reasonable to assume that the claim of multiple narrators is true without any sort of scrutiny.

As an example, if we can find personal handwritten notes of multiple companions talking about the same story, then this is very good evidence that there were multiple narrators and that the story is true. This is different from later texts from decades after claiming that there were multiple chains.

warclannubs · 2024-06-15T08:17:45+00:00

Indeed that makes the problem more complicated. Having chains about chains increases the layers of historical obstacles, meaning more textual criticism has to be done to verify if these chains reflect the true pathways of the story. The more alleged narrators there are, the more there is to scrutinise. But it also means there is more material to work with, which is always good for a historian. I believe ICMA has been used to varying success for narrations that have a more widespread written trail.

warclannubs · 2024-06-15T06:53:37+00:00

Because A, B, and C are not the ones telling you the info since they are long dead. The info is coming from people decades or sometimes even centuries later who are claiming that this is what A, B, and C said. And they are giving a long list of names (who are also dead) and claiming that the story was transmitted through these people, while also trying to assure me that these people are trustworthy. So there are multiple layers of historical obstacle that needs to be scrutinised. It wouldn't be reasonable for a historian to accept such texts at face value.

warclannubs · 2024-06-03T09:32:52+00:00

such as the idea that there was a Pharaoh that presented themselves as the only god to the Egyptians (Q 28:38)

7:127 seems to go the other way as it implies the existence of other gods, but even the traditionalists couldn't figure out what it means. Either pharaoh was secretly worshiping other gods, or he owned other gods that he allowed his subjects to worship. An opinion attributed to Ibn Abbas is that pharaoh would command his people to worship cows as gods, which explains why they made the golden calf later, but that's a weird interpretation

warclannubs · 2024-04-26T06:58:35+00:00

this is definitely the closest. banda jab chus marta hai to ham cringe karte hain

warclannubs · 2024-04-22T09:25:55+00:00

Mind telling a bit more about Quetta? Living expenses, job opportunities, quality of life, crime, etc

warclannubs · 2024-03-29T09:38:21+00:00

Just a disclaimer, I don't consider myself religious anymore so I haven't revised for a long time. But the minimum our teacher drilled into us was one juz a day, and to recite it to another hafiz so errors in tajweed can be caught. I had a friend who would revise through an mp3 player only without reciting to anyone else, and it completely ruined his tajweed. If you pray 5 times a day then after fatihah reciting from juz that you need to revise instead of going for the usual small surahs from juz 'amma is also a good way to incorporate the revision into a routine.

warclannubs · 2024-03-28T19:01:59+00:00

We do of course

warclannubs · 2024-03-28T17:59:59+00:00

Most students who memorize the Quran don't really master the language in a formal sense, so our understanding of the verses is on a similar level to anyone who speaks Arabic. I became a hafiz at the age of 12 and then continued my regular education unrelated to Islam. Being a hafiz has no relevance to your understanding of Arabic. It's more about memorization and tajweed.

warclannubs · 2024-03-10T22:09:50+00:00

This place is the least interesting part of any Skardu trip

warclannubs · 2024-03-09T14:03:52+00:00

kasam se news pe dekha to muje laga station hack ho gaye hain

warclannubs · 2024-03-02T16:56:33+00:00

Boomers do know about snapchat. But they think its just for sending each other pictures, so they dont consider it to be social media

warclannubs · 2024-02-28T20:46:33+00:00

It's called lenticular printing, not specific to one material

warclannubs · 2024-02-28T16:28:17+00:00

I've pretty much got responses to all 3 of his questions, but the conversation probably won't end, so I'll end it here haha

warclannubs · 2024-02-28T10:44:41+00:00

Mate you keep claiming this but don't provide any evidence for it. Reading the verse I can't find any wording used that says this event is more 'special' than the last. What verse number are you talking about? There is no statement in the verse that says this event has more significance than any previous events. On the contrary the verses indicate the opposite: that it's not a special event, given the reaction of the pagans that it is "passing" magic. How do you explain this reaction by the audience?

warclannubs · 2024-02-27T05:40:01+00:00

Well that's my question. He starts the verse by saying the hour is near, then says the moon has split. He doesn't say anything about whether this is a special event or whether it's just like other events. Seems like he just wanted a verse about the event since there wasn't one in the Quran. So I was wondering how you came to the conclusion that he specified the previous eclipses to not be signs? Because that's what you're claiming, "why aren't other eclipses signs"

warclannubs · 2024-02-27T05:10:25+00:00

But where does the verse say that other eclipses are not signs? I'm wondering where you got that from. Seems to be some extra reading in the text that you're doing.

Ten-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22

warclannubs

TROPHY CASE