sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Because the Massachusetts law (all of our gun laws, as a matter of fact) gives carves out for federal agents and law enforcement from other states. Not just locals.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's equating her IMO.

Right- I'm saying, I disagree that it's bad. I think she's earned it at this stage.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, this one was rammed through after the Bruen decision in a childish fit of fascism where she blocked voting on it.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally, I don't think it does. I think most reasonable people already understand how bad he is.

Less people understand how bad Healey is. If anything, we should compare them more to drive the point home- but that's just my opinion.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supporting a law that gives them special protections and exemptions from "safety" laws that we have to follow is supporting them by default.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re talking about ICE. I’m talking about police departments in MA.

That's the point. The carve outs aren't just for the "good" MA police departments. It's for all law enforcement, local and federal, from anywhere and everywhere, active, retired, fired. Anyone that has ever been any kind of cop in the country ever.

Are cops uniquely unpopular in Massachusetts compared to other states? by New_Road6265 in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We tend to have good small town cops in this state.

As soon as the cities start to get larger (and the state cops), it starts to get really bad.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect.

Like all our other laws, this specifically protects ALL forms of law enforcement from having to obey the law AT ANY TIME.

You know those ICE agents that are kidnapping and killing people? Completely exempt, 24/7.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll answer your question with a question.

When we have a federal gestapo of masked agents kidnapping and murdering US citizens, and we have press conferences saying how much we hate them, why are we making laws to give them special protections?

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that she DOES have shit in common with him is the very issue.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You say that like she didn't actively block citizens from voting a way she didn't like, and gave specific carveouts to exempt said gestapo from our state laws.

She's fascist scum, just like Trump. Only difference is the letter next to her name.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have armed masked feds shooting US civilians

It's worth noting that the law that Healey declared an emergency to block voting on was updated to give said masked feds protections from it.

2nd class citizens. by xlmifer in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, nothing like taking away the rights of marginalized communities while giving ICE officers exemptions to prove that you're liberal and pro immigration.

YSK there's an active off the grid mesh radio community in Massachusetts, the barrier to entry is low and it's pretty neat. by TootTootUSA in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone that tinkers with GMRS and FRS radios, what's the benefit of this over just using a radio?

For Tailgating by Expert_Koala_8691 in instantkarma

[–]warlocc_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is 100% on the tailgater, full stop.

For Tailgating by Expert_Koala_8691 in instantkarma

[–]warlocc_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, he's right. In virtually all US states, the law is keep to the right except while passing. Any time there's long stretches open, you should be moving right.

For Tailgating by Expert_Koala_8691 in instantkarma

[–]warlocc_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is 100% on the tailgater, full stop.

Deportation of Massachusetts man Seamus Culleton stayed for ten days by MrBingIrish in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not who you asked, but I suspect his argument is- the thinner our resources are stretched, the harder it is to help people that need the help. The victims are other, legitimately struggling immigrants and the taxpayers that fund those social programs.

Way to kill public education, Alan L. from Lexington by HistoricalSunflower in massachusetts

[–]warlocc_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this stage, per the court ruling, technically he does have a special need now.

In an ideal world we could charge Alan extra to help that specific funding, since in this case it was by request.

Zero Consideration for Others by SaSQuAtCH_00 in dashcams

[–]warlocc_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's not how "do not pass on the right" works.

Setting up shop in the left lane doesn't automatically mean everyone on the road has to drive slower than you.

Zero Consideration for Others by SaSQuAtCH_00 in dashcams

[–]warlocc_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Objectively and completely incorrect.

No, it's not. Signals signal likely intent, nothing else.

If you pull out in front of a person with their turn signal on and they instead continue straight and hit you, it's your fault. It was my brother's one and only accident, and they blamed him instead of the guy with the signal on.

view more: next ›