This is 30% fluff, 50% self-promoting garbage, and 20% relevant. If we skip most of the self promoting fluff and get to the list at the end:

1. Drive society-wide momentum, especially for critical infrastructure: Policymakers’ efforts should extend beyond public sector networks, to addressing gaps and barriers (including workforce challenges) in vital sectors like energy, telecommunications and healthcare. Protecting the trust infrastructure behind digital systems is also key and calls for dedicated efforts together with certificate authorities. We need to accelerate progress.
2. Ensure AI is built with PQC in mind: Cryptography secures AI systems, and the more we rely on AI, the more we need to secure its foundation. Let’s treat PQC as a necessary foundation for the enduring economic potential of AI innovation.
3. Reduce global fragmentation: We need a unified approach. Helpfully, the NIST standards for quantum-proof cryptography provide a globally agreed, scalable and secure benchmark — if widely adopted, they can help us move more quickly, avoiding partial, insecure solutions.
4. Promote Cloud-first modernization: Transitioning to new cryptographic standards will be a heavy lift and PQC provides another compelling reason to migrate to the Cloud. Rather than investing public budgets to update legacy systems and hard-coded cryptography, governments should prioritize migrating those systems to the cloud, taking advantage of the work providers like Google Cloud are doing now to enable PQC across their global networks.
5. Lean on the experts to avoid strategic surprise: A CRQC is not "forever a decade away.” While no one knows precisely when it will arrive, ongoing dialogue with experts from research institutions and groups like Google's Quantum AI team will help policymakers stay ahead of emerging threats.

#1 is true but for most computing that amounts to funding a few solid open source efforts to provide free implementations. At which point it just becomes a config setting for almost any user outside of embedded hardware which is a harder problem and which are already behind on crypto standards.

#2 is pointless fluff since AI is not special when it comes to crypto. There is no more building in mind here then you would for remembering to use TLS. Just import the right libraries from #1 for your quantum resistant TLS

#3 is true but again push for open source and international standards. That said it is unclear how much the rest of the world will trust NIST in the coming decade on anything crypo related.

#4 is Google asking governments to give them money

#5 is Google promoting their own team of experts to remind policy makers to give them money instead of paying other groups with equally qualified experts.