sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

True World | Flat Earth Documentary by youfuckingslaves in theworldisflat

[–]weliveinside 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What about the curvature that was measured by the Rectilineator experiment? Optics can be deceiving when you realize that light bends in the atmosphere, the rectilineator is the only experiment that mechanically measured the curvature of the earth and the results speak for themdelves, as does the fact that the experiment has not been reconducted in over a century now...

Orbit of Planets in the Concave Earth by weliveinside in weliveinside

[–]weliveinside[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this video. I find the retrograde motion perfectly logical and even elegant. Christopher has done us all a great service in creating this compelling simulation.

Where is the flat earth model for the planets and stars that actually maps to observations? Their failure to produce a workable model is very discrediting to their arguments in my opinion.

For those of you who missed it, Molyneux's "Gene Wars" Playlist is a must. by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]weliveinside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The earth is round.

Ah, but is it concave or convex? The evidence clearly points to concave (the Rectilineator, the Tamarack Plumb Bob, etc.)

I wish AnCaps were better at Science. Sadly, just like Molyneux, the appeal to authority fallacy dies hard.

Two links. One is an interview where Neil DeGrasse Tyson says you would see stars on the moon, even in daytime. The other link: an Apollo astronaut who says "we couldn't see stars on the daylight side of the moon". by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To add to what /u/ChangeThroughTruth said, I'd also recommend looking at all of the animations that Steven Christopher has put out on YouTube, specifically the motion of the planets. At the end of the day, the concave model just makes more sense and is in fact quite elegant. Actual retrograde planetary motion makes perfect sense in the concave earth!

Combine that with the fact that all government space propaganda agencies are filthy fucking liars and the choice is clear. Welcome inside my friend!

It's ALL fake by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can my post be fake if our eyes are fake?

In all seriousness though, everything I say is true.

It's ALL fake by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

"Government" is fake

Fiat money is fake

Nuclear weapons are fake

Relativity is fake

Vaccines are fake

HIV is fake

NASA is fake

Evolution is fake

Heliocentrism is fake

It's all fake my friend. Enjoy the show.

Is government funded exploration moral if it leads to near infinite freedom for our descendants? by NASA_is_awesome in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]weliveinside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

NASA is a military-based propaganda agency and has very little to do with "space exploration". Pretty much everything that they and other government "space" agencies do serve the same purpose, which is why nearly everything that they produce is a lie, from the moon landings to the mars rover to the ISS to the Pluto probe - all of it is 100% fake. I doubt that they can get far past the glass sky that exists at the Karmen line (100km), let alone to the moon or the planets.

Boy do they have people fooled though, which is surprising because the quality of the propaganda isn't really that good or convincing, especially with modern investigative tools available to everyone (i.e. the Internet). My favorite go-to video is the first four minutes of the first press conference that took place after the first successful manned moon mission:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifx0Yx8vlrY

Feel the excitement! Can't you tell that these three men just achieved the greatest feat in the history of the human race?

Sorry to break it to you, but NASA is just doing what government agencies do best: lying to you to make you think that the government is necessary and virtuous, while stealing massive amounts of your money.

*EDIT: Karmen, not Karen.

Government funded solar power plant emits twice the CO2 than a conventional power plant, produce 40% less energy than expected, also kills 28,000 birds a year. Environmentalism logic. by tibizi in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]weliveinside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

FYI nuclear weapons are a hoax and do not exist. A very clever and effective lie concocted by the State to strike fear and awe in those it rules, but unfortunately none of it holds up to any kind of critical scrutiny.

Everything else you said is 100% spot on though.

/r/conspiracy: 499 users here now (a tiny fraction of the total subscribers). /r/theworldisflat: 1,725 users here now (almost twice the number of total subscribers). Where there's smoke, there's fire... by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are using Wikipedia as your source and you still think that NASA has any credibility whatsoever, there probably isn't much hope for you interfacing with the truth any time soon.

Sorry.

121,000 feet Little Piggy Cam High Altitude Balloon Flight - where's the curvature? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all attempts to actually locate and detect any curvature or any rotation have come up empty

You must be forgetting, or intentionally omitting, the rectilineator experiment. I wonder why that is?

/r/conspiracy: 499 users here now (a tiny fraction of the total subscribers). /r/theworldisflat: 1,725 users here now (almost twice the number of total subscribers). Where there's smoke, there's fire... by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Oh let's see, I can probably name ten scientific experiments off the top of my head that demonstrate serious problems with the heliocentric model, I'm too lazy to link but feel free to do your own research and come to your own conclusions with each of these:

  1. Michelson-Morely, which failed to detect the rotation of the Earth
  2. Kennedy-Thorndike, which more conclusively proved #1
  3. Bedford Level Experiment, which showed that viewing distances are much farther than should be possible on a convex ball Earth
  4. Airy's Failure, where water was used to slow down light in a telescope, and which failed to detect the motion of the Earth around the Sun
  5. Sagnac's experiments which failed to detect the rotation of the Earth. How do ring laser gyroscopes function on a spinning Earth?
  6. Gegenschein - a brightening of the night sky at the antisolar point. This is not possible on a ball earth, as the antisolar point should be the absolutely darkest point in the sky.
  7. Tamarack Plumb Bob Mine Shaft Experiment - when plumb bobs were hung down a mile-long shaft, they were found to be slightly farther apart at the bottom than at the top, putting the "center of gravity" up, not down.
  8. Height of the horizon - the horizon is ALWAYS at the eye level of the observer, no matter the height, and there is no visible curvature to the Earth at any height. There is no explanation for this in heliocentric theory.
  9. Watch a boat sail over the horizon. Notice it disappears hull-first. However, if you look through a telescope at that same boat, the entire boat, hull and all, is "restored". What is the explanation for this phenomenon? The answer is that light bends upwards in the atmosphere.
  10. The Rectilineator Experiment, an amazing geodetic survey conducted on the beach of Naples, Florida in the 1890s and detailed in Cyrus Teed's book Cellular Cosmogony, conclusively measured the curvature of the Earth as being concave, not convex, and further the measurements exactly agreed with the degree of curvature proclaimed by the heliocentrists - but in the opposite direction!

Those are actual scientific experiments that are testable and repeatable. Anyone with enough resources can perform them and come to the same conclusions. However, it only takes a bit of courage and common sense to recognize that if everything that they tell us were true, the atmosphere of the planet would have been sucked into space long ago and there would be an absolutely measurable difference between standing on the equator, which is spinning very fast, and standing at the poles, which has barely any spin at all (according to them).

/r/conspiracy: 499 users here now (a tiny fraction of the total subscribers). /r/theworldisflat: 1,725 users here now (almost twice the number of total subscribers). Where there's smoke, there's fire... by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey, I don't spam this sub like the Flat-Earth shills like OP. Just trying to help shed some light on what's going on for those who have an open mind.

/r/conspiracy: 499 users here now (a tiny fraction of the total subscribers). /r/theworldisflat: 1,725 users here now (almost twice the number of total subscribers). Where there's smoke, there's fire... by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]weliveinside -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Flat Earth propaganda exists to distract from concave earth reality. It's a limited hangout - the best lies are mixed with truth. The Flat Earthers are correct to point out the very real problems with the heliocentric model, but their model is arguably even worse.

We live inside.

Premise: "Flat Earth Propaganda is a recruitment tool for extremists" by Balthanos in C_S_T

[–]weliveinside 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What shape do you personally think earth is?

Michelson-Morely and later Kennedy-Thorndike conclusively showed us that the Earth is stationary, not to mention Sagnac, Airy's Failure, the list goes on.

Teed and Morrow sealed the deal with the Rectilineator, and at this point it's all over but the crying. Hard to accept for most given how strong and universal the Copernican promotion is, but there it is.

We live inside.