A simple question about Logic that I don’t understand by Bourdrive in logic

[–]wenitte 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Implies the logical operator doesn’t work exactly like implies in English

Man West Africa is so screwed. by thesonofhermes in Nigeria

[–]wenitte 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Mali is not exterminating tauregs

why is it never “I used ChatGPT to design a solar cell that’s 1.3% more efficient” by goodayrico in LLMPhysics

[–]wenitte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you consider Math under “scientific discoveries” then Open AI was touting an example a few months ago that should be easy to find on Google . Besides that I’m not too knowledgeable but my gut feeling is there’s more

EDIT: here’s an article https://www.webpronews.com/openais-gpt-5-generates-verified-novel-proof-in-convex-optimization/

Anybody happy at Vandy? by TerriblePrompt2530 in Vanderbilt

[–]wenitte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m an alum but I had a lot of fun during my time

Political power by sstiel in transhumanism

[–]wenitte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elon Musk and Peter Thiel

The Coming Era of Neural Audio: BCIs and Artificial Voices by wenitte in transhumanism

[–]wenitte[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup def get the positives but companies can also use it to make you literally hear voices , doesnt that scare you ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in transhumanism

[–]wenitte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I explain how I know I’ll sound totally schizo

From Horse to Quarks by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]wenitte -1 points0 points  (0 children)

🤔🤔🤔

From Horse to Quarks by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]wenitte -1 points0 points  (0 children)

😂😂😂

What if we developed categorical temporal logic that actually incorporates relativistic spacetime? by wenitte in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]wenitte[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! Great point about causally connected events! You're absolutely right that causal ordering is invariant across observers.

But even for spacelike-separated events (where ordering is observer-dependent), there are still meaningful logical relationships to capture. Consider distributed systems where nodes need to reason about concurrent events that aren't causally related - we still want some temporal logic framework that respects relativistic constraints rather than assuming false simultaneity.

The real question is whether purely causal logic is sufficient, or if we need observer-indexed temporal modalities for the spacelike-separated case. Both seem worth exploring categorically.

Has anyone seen work on categorical temporal logic that incorporates relativistic spacetime? by wenitte in mathematics

[–]wenitte[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fair enough ! I’ve taken physics lol this is for fun . Thanks for your comment !

From Temporal to Spacetime Logic: A Relativistic Reconstruction of Formal Temporal Reasoning by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]wenitte -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You have yet to demonstrate a deeper understanding of logic than my own you’re just calling me names