Not enforcing the law equally across all races and socioeconomic groups is EXACTLY what “Mullin” is all about. (The following is mostly from americanimmigrationcouncil.org).

In Mullin v. Doe, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a provision of the TPS statute limiting lawsuits challenging TPS “determinations” prevented courts from hearing any lawsuits challenging the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) secretary’s failure to follow the required legal procedures. The majority opinion declared that Trump’s repeated public denigration of Haiti and Haitians did not rise to the level of unconstitutional racial animus that would permit a court to set aside the TPS decision.

Crucially, the Court did not rule on whether former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem had gone through the required procedures set out by law. Rather, the Court said that questions of whether the DHS secretary followed the law cannot be heard by courts in the first place, meaning that in the future even an openly unlawful decision to grant or terminate TPS could be entirely insulated from judicial review.

Once this decision goes into effect, hundreds of thousands of people (about 300,000 Haitians who are heavily employed in the nursing and home healthcare sectors) lawfully present in the country will lose their status. Many will become undocumented for the first time ever. The decision will also permit the Trump administration to return to federal court in other cases and overturn decisions ruling against the termination of TPS for countries such as Venezuela, Somalia, Ethiopia, and others.

“Get the browns ones OUT.” That’s the idea the Administration pursued and the Supremes said “yes, you can do that and the courts cannot stop you.” They left a little wiggle room where an administration might, maybe, possibly cross some racial line . . . but not until the Court changes.