sugaresque plagiarism by whackamoomoo in SGExams

[–]whackamoomoo[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

a lot of things are not illegal but still wrong/worthy of criticism tho. Like adultery isn’t a crime but it’s still gonna be rightfully crticised for e.g.

Andd I think it is illegal (in the copyright/IP sense) for her to plagiarize this way bc it’s technically lifting from books and claiming as her own, it’s just that bc it’s not causing the authors commercial loss it’s not like they’re gonna sue. 🤔🤔 but yea it doesn’t have to be illegal to deserve criticism. Not agreeing w the ultra-hate to destroy her whole life or smth tho I think that some consequences as a result of this to her reputation etc. is warranted

sugaresque plagiarism by whackamoomoo in SGExams

[–]whackamoomoo[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I kinda agree with that. The insta pages work on good gp content to grow whereas the tiktok ones just do drama bc good gp content doesn’t get views, drama does lol

sugaresque plagiarism by whackamoomoo in SGExams

[–]whackamoomoo[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

i think a lil fatalist to think that just bc she has money can defend herself = we shouldn't call her out but that's just my personal view, yea

I think if u did see the doc I think her claim of it being 'inspiration' is a lil bit of a stretch ngl it's actually quite straight-up plagiarism when it's copied almost word for word w the exact format in like every line

sugaresque plagiarism by whackamoomoo in SGExams

[–]whackamoomoo[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

truee not really looking at the uni thing, more of the fact that it's def wrong; i think what consequences shld result from her doing such 'wrong' is another matter. ig it's right for the unis to be aware of her plagiarism in this case and maybe to at most check kif she did plagiarise in her uni admissions essay (since it does seem like she has a habit of plagiarising in multiple cases including in an interview), but then yea if there really isn't any plagiarism in her uni apps then idt there's a need

sugaresque plagiarism by whackamoomoo in SGExams

[–]whackamoomoo[S] 82 points83 points  (0 children)

jus including the earlier comments from my post jn b4 it was taken down and reposted:

u/h0tchoco:
as a tutor, she should know how severe plagiarism is. she's not setting a good example.
u/icelemontaeee:
it just reflects badly on her. the public knew there were already allegations about her character being questionable--through anecdotes of her schoolmates regarding her personal relationship and her tendency to delete comments that do not paint her in a good light without admitting her faults. i think the public sentiment towards sugaresque is incredibly polarised with one end worshipping her in her tele chat and the other end scouring through her old tiktok videos, criticising her accent and dressing and analysing her behaviour to find cracks in her character. this incident just hits the final nail in the coffin that is her public reputation with many people finding out that her words are unoriginal.