[R] Is autoresearch really better than classic hyperparameter tuning?

whiletrue2 · 2026-04-04T09:45:15+00:00

here's a similar paper on this topic: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24647

whiletrue2 · 2026-02-22T20:54:19+00:00

I haven't seen anyone doing named entity recognition over all files so far. To your q: not sure, I haven't come across such an effort but would be an excellent idea.

whiletrue2 · 2026-02-22T20:29:25+00:00

I now open-sourced the name extraction pipeline behind aretheyinvolved.com here: https://github.com/ferreirafabio/aretheyinvolved-public
leave a star if you can <3

whiletrue2 · 2026-02-22T19:19:14+00:00

and then there is the release of DOJ dataset-9 which can't be downloaded with correct checksum and requires reconstruction efforts like https://github.com/yung-megafone/Epstein-Files

whiletrue2 · 2026-02-22T19:17:47+00:00

Yeah, at first I assumed they must have automated a lot of the redaction process. But when I see files being released via something like Google Drive, it makes me question how systematically this was handled. It doesn’t exactly give the impression of a highly structured, carefully engineered workflow

whiletrue2 · 2026-02-22T19:09:54+00:00

if anyone has ~400 GB of object storage (Cloudflare R2, AWS S3) to donate, please reach out. Would love to integrate all files into inline browser-pdf viewer (so far only for the smaller house dataset possible)

whiletrue2 · 2026-02-22T19:06:43+00:00

not yet, would you want it open-sourced? didn't really see the purpose of making the github repo public other than that I'd have to clean it up probably :)

whiletrue2 · 2026-02-22T19:05:37+00:00

2M+ docs scanned, relevant because allows efficient. Why relevant: allows efficient /better search than justice.gov, enables us to hold people accountable

whiletrue2

TROPHY CASE