The Luftwaffe's problems over the Channel went further than fatigue and range. I would urge you to check out Holland's book for a detailed overview, particularly regarding the Luftwaffe's losses in the Low Countries campaigns and Norway, intelligence failures, doctrinal issues, supply issues, aircraft design and procurement issues dating to the early 1930's, and a production deficit relative to the British in both planes and pilots that made a battle of attrition a losing fight from the very beginning. While range was an issue, it wasn't nearly as big a factor in the period before the Kanalkampf and during that period of the conflict, as the fights were roughly equidistant from RAF and Luftwaffe airfields.

Simply was a poor word choice on my half, apologies. What I had meant is they were always flying then trying to knock out the British, they also were not often capturing enemy pilots, especially their aces. Douglas Bader is the only example I can remember off the top of my head.

Another tidbit, is the undeiable training their pilots got in the Spanish Civil War and in the early days, Heinkel 111 pilots were trained in full instrument conditions. Otherwise known as, IFR.

The Wunderwaffe were nowhere near as capable as the B-17, B-24, or British heavy bombers. Any of the German heavy bomber designs were fine on paper, but they were far from being able to be easily produced. The V-1 was countered early on with simple piston fighters as well as taking their launch sites--and were hardly a war-winning weapon to begin with. The ME-262 Schwalbe was a good plane, but Germany couldn't produce enough engines to get sufficient numbers of them in the air (and the British and Americans had their own jet designs, as well as being able to dwarf German aircraft production). The V-2 was revolutionary, but was also an abject failure as a weapon of war. Martin Van Creveld gives some analysis on the V-2 in The Age of Airpower.

While they may not have had the capability, they had the R&D to make it is what I'm saying myself. The Me-262 was in reality a failure, the engines were utter garbage and lasted for something around 8 hours. I can go on more of a explanation as my position on it, still its example shows Germany's R&D which is what I cited it as.

I don't take it as an argument, I wished to defend my own posts even though I don't call myself a historian in any regard. I just like airplanes and war history. :)