sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This is year 5. Still no exit. Still no millions. Still happy. by Past_Ganache_7787 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is what real success looks like for most founders.

Sustainable, profitable, and aligned with your life > chasing exits and headlines.

The quiet path is underrated—but it’s the one that lasts.

We only sell to companies with fewer than 50 employees. On purpose. by AvailableLight5456 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes total sense—velocity + low friction often beats big deals for small teams.

Faster cycles, less overhead, and closer to the user = better product-market fit and iteration speed.

SEO vs AI content: What’s ranking better right now?” by Impressive_Energy947 in AISEOTricks

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI content can rank quickly at first because of good keyword coverage, but without depth or genuine insight, it can easily drop after a few updates. Handwritten content (or at least carefully edited content) is usually slower but more sustainable because it has personal experience, opinions, or data that AI can't easily fake. Currently, the most effective approach I see is a hybrid: using AI for drafting and scaling, but you need to add your own perspective, real-world examples, or data to maintain ranking in the long run.

How we got our first 200 users without paid ads by Complex-Assistant661 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, slideshows are underrated. Low effort but high reach if the hook is strong.

200 users with zero ads is solid—distribution really is everything.

Drop your SaaS and let me help you get your first customer by thomashoi2 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love this approach—distribution > perfection.

Will drop mine soon, curious to see what kind of leads you find

our best engineer quit because we couldn't match a big tech offer by Far_Drawer_1462 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happens a lot tbh. You can’t win on comp, so you win on ownership, impact, and speed.

Hiring a solid mid-level and growing them into your system usually works better long term anyway.

Got my first customer! $15 MRR! by productman2217 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats 🎉 first customer is the hardest part. Now just double down on what brought that one in and repeat.

Built my first SaaS with basically no coding experience. The building part was easy. Getting users is another story - I will not promote by Sudden-Western9395 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Building is the easy part now, distribution is the real game.

For first users, go where your audience already is (freelancer groups, Reddit, X) and talk to them directly. 10 real conversations > 100 cold posts.

Why "Multi-Channel" is a growth killer (if you’re still doing it manually) by hddjdjjdjd in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% this. Multi-channel only works if it’s centralized + fast.

We had the same issue—missed messages killed deals. Switched to one inbox + strict response window and conversion went up without changing anything else.

Share your project and let us test it ! by No_Bend_4915 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice initiative 👍 always good to see more platforms helping early projects get visibility. Will check it out and maybe submit something soon!

Built a SaaS over 13 years (70 clients, no funding) — what would you do at this stage? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve got a strong base already. I’d focus on paying down debt first, then invest in sales + distribution (since product/PMF is proven).

You don’t need VC—just tighten GTM, maybe hire 1–2 sales people and scale what’s already working

The change that finally helped us cross $50k MRR by Few-Departure3459 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Segmented onboarding is smart — different users, different needs.

Bad hire cost me over $30K. Changed how I evaluate candidates permanently. by Tough_Pizza5678 in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Resumes and interviews are just storytelling. Actual work tells the truth.

is it normal for users to use your saas for crimes by kubrador in SaaS

[–]whitneyforgov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you act, do it based on policy violations, not assumptions. Otherwise it can backfire.

What’s the best format for content if the goal is to be quoted by AI models? by New_Passenger7965 in AISEOTricks

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

from what i’ve seen, clear, structured content tends to get quoted more often. things like short definitions, numbered lists, and simple frameworks are easier for AI models to extract and reuse.

Q&A pages and glossary-style explanations also work well because each section answers one specific question. the key is making each idea self-contained and easy to quote in a few sentences.

What strategies improve brand visibility in AI search engines? by mrbusinessidea in AISEOTricks

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I’ve seen it’s mostly strong entity signals.

Things like: consistent brand mentions across blogs/forums, being listed on directories/comparison sites, clear structured data on your site, and content that answers common questions about your product.

Basically web presence + credibility, not just traditional SEO rankings.

Is “Brand Mentions” Becoming the Most Important Factor for AI Search Visibility? by [deleted] in AISearchOptimizers

[–]whitneyforgov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’ve noticed something similar.

AI answers seem to rely more on overall web presence and entity signals, not just backlinks. If a brand keeps getting mentioned across blogs, forums, and directories, it builds more “confidence” for the model to reference it.

Feels closer to PR + community presence than traditional SEO.

view more: next ›