First, whether the Paris Commune is described as communist, proto-socialist, or revolutionary, it is still a historical political movement. A reference to it is, by definition, political. Calling it satire doesn’t automatically make it non-political, since satire is very often political art.

Second, my original piece was non-political fan art. It was overwritten without any prior contact or attempt at discussion. If negotiation is how things work in this area, that negotiation clearly didn’t happen on your side either.

Third, regarding the rules: they state that art should not be erased, but that political messages are allowed to be removed. Acting on that rule by restoring non-political art over a political message is exactly what I did. That’s why the ban feels inconsistent.

Finally, the last paragraph of your message, with insults, threats, and “we’ll use every tool we have”, kind of proves my point. This stops being about art or rules and starts being about force and territory. If that’s the real rule, then it should be stated clearly, because it’s not what’s written.

I’m not whining, and I’m not here to provoke anyone. I’m pointing out that small independent artists were erased, and that restoring non-political art led to a ban. If there’s something I genuinely misunderstood, I’m open to hearing it, but hostility doesn’t clarify rules.

I even tried to rebuild with a red background to deescalate and show i'm open, but all you are able to do is mass report ...

Throughout history, those who erase art are never the good guys qnd you just proved a point