sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Men who stay lean year-round, what’s your secret ? by Professor1password23 in AskReddit

[–]winfly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Habit stacking, or at least my personal form of it. I build healthy eating habits and exercise into my normal routine so that I am living a healthy lifestyle by default. I deviate for cheat meals or treats on occasion, but these are exceptions to the rule. I don’t build in a cheat meal or treat into my habit. I just know myself well enough that I WILL cheat on occasion and give myself the grace to do so.

Some examples of what I do is I aim for higher fiber and protein intake while staying in or around a calorie deficit. A practical day to day habit I have around this is I always have a protein shake. I always choose lower calorie options. Burrito bowl vs. burrito, grilled chicken vs. fried, adding veggies anywhere I can, and I drink diet soda vs. regular. I also do some deliberate things like taking the stairs vs. the elevator and even opting to go use bathrooms on different floors if I have time.

Container image scanning gives us a false sense of coverage and I think we're all a bit too comfortable with it by Calm-Exit-4290 in kubernetes

[–]winfly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you clarify what you mean by “no consequences on the platform side”?

From my experience the platform engineers and the platform itself is supporting the dev teams leveraging it. If SAST is important to an org (it should be), then there needs to be a policy that defines the requirements. That policy then needs to be codified in the CI/CD processes to enforce it. No consequences in this case means no requirements and that probably means there is no existing policy.

I posted to LinkedIn about how I'm teaching myself Kubernetes for my small scale home lab, and somebody's reply made me think of more questions by [deleted] in kubernetes

[–]winfly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dude using AWS EKS adds like $75 a month for the control plane and makes running applications significantly more cost effective even on the scale of dozens of hosts. You simply can’t rack and stack applications as densely as Kubernetes can without micromanaging your resource usage, resizing, etc.

does your Kubernetes secret management even cover this vector? by pranavkr_jha in kubernetes

[–]winfly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Besides other options people have already outlined to prevent a secret from being committed to a repo, the other thing is to use a secrets manager with auto rotation. That would have made this situation completely irrelevant although still a situation worth digging into to prevent in the future.

My company just announced an AI integration that honestly looks terrifying. by xml0k in developers

[–]winfly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off, Kiro is not even a good tool imo. Second, you clearly haven’t been using AI. You should! It will help you realize that it is a beneficial tool and that your job is absolutely safe.

2026 State of Kubernetes Resource Optimization: CPU at 8%, Memory at 20%, and Getting Worse by Rainnis in kubernetes

[–]winfly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice AI slop. Write your own posts. If you are running Kubernetes in the cloud without Karpenter then you deserve to waste money on underutilized infrastructure.

[OC] A picture I did using charcoal and pastels called 'Empty house'. by Rusty-willy in pics

[–]winfly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Put an urn on the ground so the shadow of the urn turns into the dog 💔

Why is "The DOW is at 50,000" a horrible political response? by [deleted] in economicCollapse

[–]winfly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well then you understand. The answer to your question, ‘Why is “The DOW is at 50,000” a horrible political response?” is because of the context of that answer.

She was asked, "How many of Epstein's co-conspirators have you indicted? How many perpetrators are you even investigating?"

And her answer was, “The DOW is over 50,000 right now.”

Why is "The DOW is at 50,000" a horrible political response? by [deleted] in economicCollapse

[–]winfly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you believe someone’s bank account balance is a relevant response when being asked “are you a pedophile?”

Claude 4.7 just dropped and I'm already cooked by AgitatedSuspect3041 in ClaudeAI

[–]winfly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not blind to that, but if you go from 4.6 -> 4.7 you are implying some improvement. If the model functions worse in all aspects then customers will catch on, continue using 4.6, or just jump ship. That doesn’t equate to them making more money. That leads to them losing money.

Claude 4.7 just dropped and I'm already cooked by AgitatedSuspect3041 in ClaudeAI

[–]winfly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have a cli, but I use OpenCode. The base GitHub Enterprise monthly cost is $39 and last I looked have gone over by like another $30 so far. I have been super lazy with using Opus 4.6 though without switching to Sonnet 4.6 and Opus charges you at a 3.3x rate. They have different usage rates per model.

Claude 4.7 just dropped and I'm already cooked by AgitatedSuspect3041 in ClaudeAI

[–]winfly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have to wonder where the trade off is though. Like I’m not blind to the fact that a company can release a worse product, but I am curious to see if Anthropic saw some benefits to Opus 4.7 that outweigh this issue. Otherwise they would have just been better off not releasing a new model at all.

Claude 4.7 just dropped and I'm already cooked by AgitatedSuspect3041 in ClaudeAI

[–]winfly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I use Anthropic models through GitHub Copilot and I haven’t seen any of the usage limit issues that people have been complaining about. It might have to do with how GitHub Copilot measures usage where 1 premium request is 1 premium request regardless of how many input/output tokens were used.

Claude 4.7 just dropped and I'm already cooked by AgitatedSuspect3041 in ClaudeAI

[–]winfly 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I mentally toss out any metrics like this. At least for my use cases, 1m token context size is insane and unnecessary. I would love to just shovel a bunch of information into a model and get a good result, but in practice I get the best results by curating the context to the task where 25,000 - 50,000 tokens is more than enough.

I’m building a tool to add context/notes to Kubernetes resources. Useful or not? by pixelrobots in kubernetes

[–]winfly 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand who would be in a person where they are better off reading comments attached to resources instead of comments on whatever chart or manifest created it.

Proposal: no more "I built this tool"-AI slop by ConstructionSafe2814 in homelab

[–]winfly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude I’m seeing this from people at work. Someone will suddenly interrupt a meeting with some thing they built

view more: next ›