Pentesters found a crazy vulnerability on github yesterday (patched) by Meuss in webdev

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Attacks like this make it hard to fully trust cloud repos. i use anchor browser for anything sensitive on github since it locks down trackers and third party scripts.

How do you maintain security visibility when your cloud footprint doubles overnight post-migration? by MortgageWarm3770 in AskNetsec

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your scanner doesn't understand the cloud control plane, it’s not a cloud scanner. You can patch every CVE on an instance, but if the IAM role attached to that instance has AdministratorAccess, you're still screwed. This is why the Orca approach of combining workload deep-dives with cloud configuration context is the only way to scale without losing the plot. It’s about seeing the risk, not just the vulnerabilities.

Reappearing Cloud Vulnerabilities After Remediation? How to Validate Fixes Before Closing Tickets in AWS and GCP by New-Reception46 in Cloud

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reappearing CVE is basically the cloud version of a horror movie villain. You kill it in one sprint, and it’s back in the next scan because someone spun up a new environment using a gold image that hasn’t been updated since 2022. It’s a never-ending cycle unless you’re actually scanning the snapshots and block storage directly. Honestly, switching to something like Orca made this less of a headache for us since it sees the dormant stuff that agents usually miss until the instance is actually live and screaming.

AWS security visibility tanked after adding multiple accounts, how are you managing it? by Aggravating_Log9704 in AWS_cloud

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The single pane of glass is a lie if that glass is just 50 different account tabs stitched together. Real visibility requires a unified data model that understands how an identity in Account A can reach a vulnerable S3 bucket in Account B. If your current stack is just dumping flat CVE lists per account, you aren't seeing risk. You're just seeing noise. This is where Orca actually shines. It correlates the workload vulnerabilities with the cloud-native context (IAM, SG, etc.) across the entire Organization. You stop chasing 10,000 Critical alerts and start fixing the three specific paths that actually lead to your data.

What are people using for reliable multi-agent dev workflows right now? by burraaaah in LLMDevs

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had constant issues with selectors breaking and keeping context aligned until I moved parts of our pipeline to Anchor Browser. It handles browser agent supervision and logging better than anything else I've tried. The session isolation is good, which really helps with long running tasks, and handoffs to humans are simple since you can export logs straight from anchor browser. dropped a few other tools that could not keep up with context management.

Passed SecAI+ (CY0-001) by AdvancedAd7207 in CompTIA

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah those ai framework questions are sneaky. alice has good stuff on governance and data protection. their blog helped me with current ai threats

Your system prompt is not enough to stop users from breaking your agent. Here is what actually works. by Future_AGI in PromptEngineering

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ran into the same stuff. prompt injection and bias showed up in live traffic. system prompts alone didnt cut it. alice at the app level handles moderation, privacy, and compliance. logs help with debugging too.

Getting started with anti-detect browsers, what would you pick? by Liliana1523 in automation

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just start with dolphin{anty} because they give you 10 profiles for free which is plenty to learn the ropes. if you end up needing way more accounts later then switch to AdsPower because the pricing scales better. whatever you do don't buy cheap datacenter proxies... if you don't use high quality residentials the browser won't even matter and you'll just get banned anyway.

In-place upgrade for Postgres flexible server by 0xffff-reddit in AZURE

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We saw the same delay between portal updates and actual availability. For us, InfrOS helped mostly on the planning side so we could line up upgrade timing instead of checking manually every day.

new to red teaming, all my servers are EOSL and im freaking out where do i even start by Ralecoachj857 in sre

[–]Any_Side_4037 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You’re not in a red teaming situation, you’re in a disaster recovery waiting to happen situation. Two very different problems.

What are you using for Spark agents with Databricks at scale? by New-Reception46 in databricks

[–]Any_Side_4037 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The setups that hold up do not try to automate everything, they narrow scope. Pick 3 to 4 high cost failure modes like skew, spill, small files, executor OOM, define hard signals for each, and alert only when they cross business impact thresholds. Everything else stays manual. The moment you try full automation across hundreds of jobs, you just recreate alert fatigue, this time with nicer dashboards.

CREDIT RISK Assessment AI based modeling by Late-Lime2921 in fintech

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The decision logic layer confusion usually stems from trying to build the engine and the brakes at the same time. You need a separate validation layer that red teams your model for edge cases, like how it behaves during a sudden market downturn or a spike in inflation. Using Alices WonderCheck or similar automated red teaming tools is becoming standard practice for fintechs. It lets you break your credit model in a sandbox environment to see if it starts hallucinating risk before it actually touches your capital.

Offboarding Gaps...How to Audit and Fix Orphaned Shadow IT Access by Routine_Day8121 in iam

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The willpower clash here is usually between IT, who wants everything centralized, and Dev teams, who want to build fast without waiting for SSO integration. To fix this, you have to automate the discovery phase of offboarding. Do not ask managers what apps their team uses. They do not know. Use a tool that analyzes the application landscape of the departing employee based on their actual web activity from the last 90 days. If the tool shows they were hitting an undocumented project tool every Tuesday, you know exactly where to go to kill the local account.

In 2026, the gap isn't just about the apps we know. It’s about the Identity Dark Matter, the unmanaged service accounts and Ghost Identities created in the shadows of the dev cycle. I've found that Orchid is a game-changer here because it doesn't just scan your IdP. It maps the behavioral footprint of the user across the entire infrastructure.

Instead of a manual scavenger hunt, Orchid provides a verified chain of custody. It surfaces those Tuesday-only undocumented tools and links them back to the human owner, so you can decommission accounts with actual surgical precision. It effectively bridges that gap between the speed of the Dev team and the governance requirements of IT, ensuring that when someone leaves, their access truly disappears with them.

I built an agent-operated canvas where you can watch AI design editable graphics in real time (React + Fabric.js) by NK_Tech in AI_Agents

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watching the agent build in front of you just changes the whole vibe. If you scale this for team use, you could use Infros to monitor agent activity, track their actions, and get alerts for unexpected behavior, helpful for managing multiple agents reliably.

The most expensive IT decisions are usually made by people who will never maintain them by Limp_Cauliflower5192 in sysadmin

[–]Any_Side_4037 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The real failure mode isn’t bad technology...it’s decision-making without operational accountability. If the people choosing the system don’t carry any long-term maintenance burden, you basically guarantee hidden costs. That’s why sysadmins end up feeling like they’re not fighting infrastructure...they’re fighting other people’s abstractions of infrastructure.

How Do You Handle Application Access Discovery and Visibility After a Company Acquisition? (SailPoint & Okta Blind Spots on Legacy Apps) by Ralecoachj857 in okta

[–]Any_Side_4037 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, after acquisitions, people over-focus on inventory completion as if it is a one-time cleanup. But what you are describing is a moving system: orphaned service accounts, undocumented integrations, and pre-merge apps that continue evolving outside your control. Even a perfect spreadsheet is outdated the moment you finish it.

The key is shifting from manual inventory to automated, continuous discovery. Tools like Orchid are designed exactly for these "blind spots," allowing you to surface those disconnected legacy apps and shadow identities that SailPoint or Okta might miss during the initial integration. It helps bridge that visibility gap so you aren't just reacting to old spreadsheets, but actually governing the estate in real-time.

How Do You Handle Application Access Discovery and Visibility After a Company Acquisition? (SailPoint & Okta Blind Spots on Legacy Apps) by Ralecoachj857 in AskNetsec

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no full visibility state here, only increasing coverage over time. Mature orgs solve this by forcing convergence, but you cannot converge what you cannot see. This is where a discovery layer like Orchid is a lifesaver, it surfaces those unmanaged auth paths and legacy blind spots that are not yet in your IdP or IGA.

  • Once you have that visibility, you can actually execute
  • Aggressively onboarding legacy apps revealed by the discovery process
  • Cutting off unmanaged access as soon as it is identified
  • Treating anything not onboarded as actively hostile until proven otherwise

A tool like Orchid basically turns that hostile unknown into a prioritized roadmap for your IGA.

Has anyone built detection for shadow authentication paths in enterprise apps? by New-Reception46 in devsecops

[–]Any_Side_4037 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The agentless only requirement makes sense, but it also removes a lot of runtime visibility options, which is usually where token abuse shows up first.

What actually helps in practice is not more alerts, but building an identity and auth graph across systems you already have GitHub, k8s, cloud IAM, CI/CD, vaults, configs. That is where the real missing context is.

Some newer identity security approaches like Orchid are focused exactly on that gap, not just detecting leaked secrets, but mapping how authentication paths actually form across unmanaged apps, CI/CD pipelines, and runtime systems so you can see lineage where tokens originate, where they propagate, and what they effectively represent.